Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T15:15:54.119Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An efficient method for predicting zero-lift or boundary-layer drag including aeroelastic effects for the design environment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2016

J. A. Camberos
Affiliation:
US Air Force Research Laboratory, Dayton, Ohio, USA
R. M. Kolonay
Affiliation:
US Air Force Research Laboratory, Dayton, Ohio, USA
F. E. Eastep
Affiliation:
University of Dayton, Dayton, Ohio, USA
R. F. Taylor
Affiliation:
Wright State University, Dayton, Ohio, USA

Abstract

One of the aerospace design engineer’s goals aims to reduce drag for increased aircraft performance, in terms of range, endurance, or speed in the various flight regimes. To accomplish this, the designer must have rapid and accurate techniques for computing drag. At subsonic Mach numbers drag is primarily a sum of lift-induced drag and zero-lift drag. While lift-induced drag is easily and efficiently determined by a far field method, using the Trefftz plane analysis, the same cannot be said of zero-lift drag. Zero-lift drag (CD,0) usually requires consideration of the Navier-Stokes equations, the solution of which is as yet unknown except by using approximate numerical techniques with computational fluid dynamics (CFD). The approximate calculation of zero-lift drag from CFD is normally computed with so-called near-field techniques, which can be inaccurate and too time consuming for consideration in the design environment. This paper presents a technique to calculate zero-lift and boundary-layer drag in the subsonic regime that includes aeroelastic effects and is suitable for the design environment. The technique loosely couples a two-dimensional aerofoil boundary-layer model with a 3D aeroelastic solver to compute zero-lift drag. We show results for a rectangular wing (baseline), a swept wing, and a tapered wing. Then compare with a rectangular wing with variable thickness and camber, thinning out from the root to tip (spanwise direction), thus demonstrating the practicality of the technique and its utility for rapid conceptual design.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Kolonay, R. and Eastep, E.Optimal scheduling of control surfaces on flexible wings to reduce induced drag, J Aircr, November-Decemter 2006, 43, (06), pp 16551661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Mason, W.H. FRICTION: From the Virginia Tech Aerodynamics and Design Software Collection, Website, 2011, www.aoe.vt.edu/~mason/Mason f/friction.f.Google Scholar
3.Jepson, J.K. and Gopalarathnam, A. Computational study of automated adaption of a wing with multiple trailing- edge flaps, AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting & Exhibition, January 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Neill, D.J. and Herendeen, D.L.ASTROS User’s Manual, Agency: Universal Analytics, WL-TR-963004, Tech rep, Universal Analytics, May 1995.Google Scholar
5.Wauquiez, C. and Rizzi, A.PABLO: Potential Flow Around Aerofoils with Boundary Layer Coupled One-Way, Tech rep, The Royal Institute of Technology, 1999, http://www.nada.kth.se/chris/pablo/pablo.html.Google Scholar
6.Abbot, I.H. and Von Doenhoff, A.E.Theory Of Wing Sections, Dover Publications, New York, NY, 1959.Google Scholar
7.Katz, J. and Plotkin, A.Low-Speed Aerodynamics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Kroo, I. PANDA – A Program for Analysis and Design of Aerofoils. Tech rep, 1988.Google Scholar
9.Moran, J.An Introduction to Theoretical and Computational Aerodynamics, John Wiley & Sons, Inc, New York, US, 1984.Google Scholar