Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T04:36:56.637Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An analytical model for ACSR approach to vibration reduction in a helicopter rotor-flexible fuselage system

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

T. Chiu  and
P. P. Friedmann
T. Chiu
Affiliation:
Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering DepartmentUniversity of California, Los AngelesCalifornia, USA
P. P. Friedmann
Affiliation:
Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering DepartmentUniversity of California, Los AngelesCalifornia, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper describes the development of a coupled rotor-flexible fuselage model which is suitable for simulating vibration reduction based on the active control of structural response (ACSR) approach. The rotor is an Nb-bladed aeroelastic model, with coupled flap-lag-torsional dynamics for each blade. Moderate blade deflections are included, together with complete coupling between rotor and fuselage dynamics. This aeroelastic response model is combined with a control algorithm based on an internal model principle. The control scheme effectively reduces vibrations to 0·05g levels or lower, using reasonable actuator forces. The baseline vibration levels in the fuselage are relatively high. This is due to the lack of damping modelling in the fuselage. With the actuators engaged, the hub loads remain virtually unchanged and therefore this control approach has no influence on vehicle airworthiness.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 101 , Issue 1009 , November 1997 , pp. 399 - 408
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1997 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Crews, S.T. Rotorcraft vibration criteria: a new perspective, Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Forum of the American Helicopter Society, St Louis, Missouri, May 1987.Google Scholar
2. Aeronautical Design Standard (ADS-27), Requirements for Rotorcraft Vibration Specifications, Modeling and Testing, US Army Aviation System Command, Novermber 1986.Google Scholar
3. Reichert, G. Helicopter vibration control — a survey, Vertica, 1981, 5, (1).Google Scholar
4. Loewy, R.G. Helicopter vibrations: a technological perspective, J Amer Heli Soc, October 1984, 29, (4), pp 4–30.Google Scholar
5. Kvaternik, R.G., Bartlett, F.D. and Cline, J.H. A summary of recent NASA/ARMY contributions to rotorcraft vibrations and structural dynamics technology, NASA/ARMY Rotorcraft Technology, NASA-CP 2495, 1988.Google Scholar
6. Friedmann, P.P. Helicopter vibration reduction using structural optimization with aeroelastic/multidisciplinary constraints — a survey, J Aircr, 1991, 28, (1), pp 8–21.Google Scholar
7. Friedmann, P.P. and Millot, T.A. Vibration reduction in rotorcraft using active control: a comparison of various approaches, J Guid, Cont and Dynam, July-August 1995, 18, (4).Google Scholar
8. King, S.P. and Staple, A.E. Minimization of helicopter vibration through active control of structural response, Rotorcraft Design Operations, AGARD-CP-423, October 1986, pp 14–1–14–13.Google Scholar
9. Niwa, Y. and Katayama, N. Active vibraton reduction system for a helicopter, Proceedings of the 20th European Rotorcraft Forum, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, October 1994, pp 70–01 and 70–14.Google Scholar
10. Kawaguchi, H., Bandoh, S. and Niwa, Y. The test results for AVR (Active vibration reduction) system, Presented at the American Helicopter Society 52nd Annual Forum, Washington DC, 4–6 June 1996, pp 123–136.Google Scholar
11. Staple, A.E. An evaluation of active control of structural response as a means of reducing helicopter vibration, Proceedings of the 15th European Rotorcraft Forum, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, September 1989, pp 3–17.Google Scholar
12. Welsh, W.A., Von Hardenberg, P.C., Von Hardenberg, P.W. and Staple, A.E. Test and evaluation of fuselage vibration utilizing active control of structural response (ACSR) optimized to ADS-27, Proceedings of 46th Annual Forum of the American Helicopter Society, Washington DC May 1990, pp 21–37.Google Scholar
13. Welsh, W. et al Flight Test on an active vibration control system on the UH-60 Black Hawk Helicopter, Proceedings of the 51th Annual Forum of the American Helicopter Society, Fort Worth, TX, 9–11 May 1995, pp 393–402.Google Scholar
14. Chiu, T. and Friedmann, P.P. A coupled helicopter rotor-fuselage aeroelastic response model for ACSR, AIAA-95-1226-CP, Proceedings of the 36th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dy namics and Materials Conference, New Orleans, LA, 10–13 April 1995, pp 574–600.Google Scholar
15. Chiu, T. and Friedmann, P.P. ACSR system for vibration suppression in coupled helicopter rotor-flexible fuselage model, AIAA-96-1547-CP, Proceedings of 37th AIAA/ASME/ ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, Salt Lake City, UT, 14–17 April 1996, pp 1972–1991.Google Scholar
16. Chiu, T. and Friedmann, P.P. Vibration suppression in helicopter rotor-flexible fuselage system using the active control of structural response (ACSR) approach with disturbance rejection, Presented at the American Helicopter Society 52nd Annual Forum, Washington, DC, 4–6 June 1996, pp 736–757.Google Scholar
17. Venkatesan, C. and Friedmann, P.P. Aeroelastic effects in multi-rotor vehicles with applications to a heavy-lift system, Part 1: formulation of equations of motion, NASA-CR 3822, August 1984.Google Scholar
18. Venkatesan, C. and Friedmann, P.P. Aeroelastic effects in multi-rotor vehicles, Part 2: method of solution and results illustrating coupled rotor-fuselage aeromechanical stability, NASA-CR 4009, 1986.Google Scholar
19. Papavassiliou, I., Friedmann, P.P. and Venkatesan, C. Coupled rotor-fuselage vibration reduction using open-loop blade pitch control, Math Comp Model, 1993, 18, (3/4), pp 131–156.Google Scholar
20. Vellaichamy, S. and Chopra, I. Aeroelastic response of helicopters with flexible fuselage modeling, AIAA Paper 92-2567-CP, Proceedings of the 33rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, Dallas, TX, 13–15 April 1992, pp 2015–2026.Google Scholar
21. Vellaichamy, S. and Chopra, I. Effect of modeling techniques in the coupled rotor-body vibraton analysis, AIAA 93-1360-CP, Proceedings of 34th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, La Jolla, CA, 19–22 April 1993, pp 53–575.Google Scholar
22. Rosen, A. and Friedmann, P.P. Nonlinear equations of equilibrium for elastic helicopter or wind turbine blades undergoing moderate deformation, NASA CR-159478, December 1978.Google Scholar
23. MACSYMA: Reference Manual, Symbolics, June 1986.Google Scholar
24. Greenberg, J.M. Airfoil in sinusoidal motion in a pulsating stream, NACA-TN 1326, 1947.Google Scholar
25. Shamie, J. and Friedmann, P.P. Effect of moderate deflections on the aeroelastic stability of a rotor blade in forward flight, Paper No 24, Proceedings of the 3rd European Rotorcraft and Powered Lift Aircraft Forum, Aix-en-Provence, France, September 1977.Google Scholar
26. Surana, K. Consistent mass matrices for three dimensional beam element due to distributed and lumped non-structural mass systems acting on its span, Comps and Struct, 1981, 13, pp 515–524.Google Scholar
27. Stoppel, J. and DEGENER Investigations of helicopter structural dynamics and a comparison with ground vibration tests, AHS J, April 1982, 27, pp 34–42.Google Scholar
28. Stephens, W.B. and Peters, D.A. Rotor-body coupling revisited, AHS J, January 1987, 32, (1), pp 68–72.Google Scholar
29. IMSL Library: Reference Manual, IMSL, Houston, Texas, 1980.Google Scholar
30. Petry, J. Servo-actuator control for sampled-data feedback disturbance rejection, European Space Agency, Translation of DFVLR-FB-86-08, November 1987.Google Scholar
31. Chen, C.T. Linear System Theory and Design , CBS College Publishing, 1984.Google Scholar
32. Rosenbrock, H.H. State-Space and Multivariable Theory, London: Nelson and Sons, 1979.Google Scholar