Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T08:59:43.528Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Aerodynamics — the role of the computer

Part of: RAeS Lanchester Lecture Papers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

G.J. Hancock
G.J. Hancock*
Affiliation:
Department of Aeronautical Engineering, Queen Mary College, University of London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Tonight, once again, we honour the memory of Frederick William Lanchester, one of the great pioneers of modern engineering, born in 1868 died in 1946. We keep his memory alive by exploring how his ideas and concepts have flowered into maturity, and by reminding ourselves that his example, philosophy and strength of purpose are still relevant in today’s world. I suppose each of us reacts individually to the life and work of a great man.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 89 , Issue 887 , September 1985 , pp. 269 - 279
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1985 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Kingsford, P. W. A Life of an Engineer. Edward Arnold Ltd. 1960.Google Scholar
2. Von Karman, T. Lanchester’s Contributions to the Theory of Flight and Operational Research. Jnl RAeS, February 1958,62.Google Scholar
3. Collar, A. R. Aeroelasticity Retrospect and Prospect. Jnl RAeS, January 1959,63.Google Scholar
4. Schlichting, H. Some Developments in Boundary Layer Research in the Past Thirty Years. Jnl RAeS, February 1960,64.Google Scholar
5. Young, A. D. British Universities and Aeronautical Research. Jnl RAeS, March 1961,65.Google Scholar
6. Legendre, R. C. From Ship-accompanying Waves to Shock Waves of Supersonic Aeroplanes. Jnl RAeS, March 1962,66.Google Scholar
7. Jones, W. P. Trends in Unsteady Aerodynamics. Jnl RAeS,March 1963,67.Google Scholar
8. Ferri, A. Review of Problems in Application to Supersonic Combustion. Jnl RAeS, September 1964,68.Google Scholar
9. Richards, E. J. Aeronautical Research at Southampton University. Jnl RAeS, August 1965,69.Google Scholar
10. Mair, W. A. STOL Some Possibilities and Limitations. Jnl RAeS, September 1966,70.Google Scholar
11. Germain, P. Recent Developments in Aerodynamic Problems and Methods. Jnl RAeS, October 1967. 71.Google Scholar
12. Burt, E. G. C. Dynamics of Low Thrust Spacecraft Manoeuvres. The Aeronautical Journal, November 1968,72.Google Scholar
13. Argyris, J. H. The Impact of the Digital Computer in Engineering Science. The Aeronautical Journal, Part 1 January, Part 2 February 1970,74.Google Scholar
14. Jones, J. P. The Helicopter Rotor. The Aeronautical Journal, November 1970. 74.Google Scholar
15. Miller, R. H. Some Air Transportation Concepts for the Future. The Aeronautical Journal, July 1971, 75.Google Scholar
16. Owen, P. R. The Aerodynamics of Aircraft and Other Things. The Aeronautical Journal, August 1973,77.Google Scholar
17. Sears, W. R. Self Correcting Wind Tunnels. The Aeronautical Journal, February/March 1974,78.Google Scholar
18. Hearne, P. A. Automatic Control — The New Dimension in Aircraft Design. Aerospace, 1, July 1974,1.Google Scholar
19. Doetsch, K. H. The Proper Symbiosis of the Human Pilot and Automatic Flight Control. The Aeronautical Journal, June 1975, 79.Google Scholar
20. Crabtree, L. F. Engineering Art and Science. Aerospace, September 1976,3,7.Google Scholar
21. Gerlach, O. H. Developments in Mathematical Models of Human Pilot Behaviour. The Aeronautical Journal, July 1977, 81.Google Scholar
22. Rogers, E. W. E. Aerodynamics Retrospect and Prospect. The Aeronautical Journal, February 1982,86.Google Scholar
23. Poisson—Quinton, Ph. Aerospace Research as seen by a French Engineer. Unpublished.Google Scholar
24. Lilley, G. M. Vortices and Turbulence — Their Influence on Aerodynamic Design. The Aeronautical Journal, December 1983,87.Google Scholar
25. Lanchester, F. W. The Radial Cursor: A New Addition to the Slide Rule. Phil Mag, January 1896.Google Scholar
26. Chapman, D. R. Computational Aerodynamics Development and Outlook, Dryden Lecture. AIAA Journal, 12, December 1979. 17.Google Scholar
27. Kutler, P. A Perspective of Theoretical and Applied Computational Fluid Dynamics, AIAA Journal, March 1985,23, 3 Google Scholar
28. Lighthill, M. J. Mathematics in Aeronautics. J Roy Aero Soc, 1960, 64,375–384.Google Scholar
29. Peterson, V. L. Trends in Computational Trends for Fluid Dynamics: Unsteady Aerodynamics — Fundamentals and Applications to Aircraft Dynamics. AGARD CPP 386,1985.Google Scholar
30. Roache, P. J. Computational Fluid Dynamics, Hermosa Publishers, 1972,113.Google Scholar
31. Jameson, A. and Baker, T. J. Multigrid Solution of the Euler Equations for Aircraft Configurations. AIAA Paper 84-0093, January 1984.Google Scholar
32. Monsour, N. N. Numerical Simulation of the Tip Vortex Off a Low Aspect Ratio Wing at Transonic Speed. AIAA Paper 84-0522, January 1984.Google Scholar
33. Marvin, J. G. Turbulence Modelling for Computational Aerodynamics. AIAA Journal, July 1983,21,7.Google Scholar
34. Bascovich, J. D. A Comparison of Separated Flow Airfoil Analysis Methods. Journal of Aircraft, March 1985,22,3.Google Scholar
35. McCroskey, J. Contribution to Discussion: Wall Interference in Wind Tunnels. AGARD CP No 335,1982.Google Scholar
36. Rubbert, P. E. and Tinoco, E. N. Impact of Computational Methods on Aircraft Design. AIAA Paper 83-2060, August 1983.Google Scholar
37. Kuchemann, D. The Aerodynamic Design of Aircraft. Pergamon Press, 1978.Google Scholar
38. Korkegi, R. H. Impact of Computational Fluid Dynamics on Development Test Facilities. Journal of Aircraft, March 1985, 22,3.Google Scholar
39. Flax, A. H. Aeronautics: A Study in Technological and Economic Growth and Form. Wilbur Wright Lecture. The Aeronautical Journal, December 1974,78.Google Scholar
40. Parker, R. L. Jnr, and Stickles, W. L. Application of the Adaptive Wall Concept in Three Dimensions. Journal of Aircraft, March 1981,18,3.Google Scholar
41. Heddergott, A. and Wedemeyer, E. Deformable Adaptive Wall Test Section for Three Dimensional Wind Tunnel Testing. 14th ICAS Congress 84 —2.1.2,1984.Google Scholar
42. Barton, J. H. Role of Computational Fluid Dynamics in Aeropropulsion Ground Testing. Journal of Aircraft, October 1984,21,10.Google Scholar
43. Iliffe, K. W. Extraction of Aerodynamic Parameters for Aircraft at Extreme Flight Conditions. AGARD Symposium on Unsteady Aerodynamics Fundamentals and Applications to Aircraft Dynamics. Gottingen. May 1985.Google Scholar