Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-31T19:07:16.292Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

AASK — aircraft accident statistics and knowledge: a database of human experience in evacuation, derived from aviation accident reports

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

M. Owen ,
E. R. Galea ,
P. J. Lawrence  and
L. Filippidis
M. Owen
Affiliation:
Fire Safety Engineering GroupUniversity of GreenwichLondon, UK
E. R. Galea
Affiliation:
Fire Safety Engineering GroupUniversity of GreenwichLondon, UK
P. J. Lawrence
Affiliation:
Fire Safety Engineering GroupUniversity of GreenwichLondon, UK
L. Filippidis
Affiliation:
Fire Safety Engineering GroupUniversity of GreenwichLondon, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Computer based mathematical models describing the aircraft evacuation process have a vital role to play in aviation safety. However, such models have a heavy dependency on real evacuation data in order to (a) identify the key processes and factors associated with evacuation, (b) quantify variables and parameters associated with the identified factors/processes and finally (c) validate the models. The Fire Safety Engineering Group of the University of Greenwich is undertaking a large data extraction exercise from three major data sources in order to address these issues. This paper describes the extraction and application of data from one of these sources — aviation accident reports. To aid in the storage and analysis of the raw data, a computer database known as AASK (aircraft accident statistics and knowledge) is under development. AASK is being developed to store human observational and anecdotal data contained in accident reports and interview transcripts. AASK comprises four component sub-databases. These consist of the ACCIDENT (crash details), FLIGHT ATTENDANT (observations and actions of the flight attendants), FATALS (details concerning passenger fatalities) and PAX (observations and accounts from individual passengers) databases. AASK currently contains information from 25 survivable aviation accidents covering the period 4 April 1977 to 6 August 1995, involving some 2415 passengers, 2210 survivors, 205 fatalities and accounts from 669 people. In addition to aiding the development of aircraft evacuation models, AASK is also being used to challenge some of the myths which proliferate in the aviation safety industry such as, passenger exit selection during evacuation, nature and frequency of seat jumping, speed of passenger response and group dynamics. AASK can also be used to aid in the development of a more comprehensive approach to conducting post accident interviews, and will eventually be used to store the data directly.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 102 , Issue 1017 , September 1998 , pp. 353 - 364
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1998 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Owen, M., Galea, E.R., Lawrence, P.J. and Filippidis, L. OTA, 1993, The numerical simulation of aircraft evacuation, to appear in the RAE J, 1998.Google Scholar
2. OTA, 1993, Aircraft evacuation testing: research and technology issues. Background Paper, Technical Report OTA-BP-SET-121, Office of Technology Assessment Congress of the United States.Google Scholar
3. Galea, E.R. and Galparsoro, J.M.P. EXODUS: An evacuation model for mass transport vehicles, Technical Report, UK CAA Paper 93006 ISBN 086039 543X, 1993.Google Scholar
4. Galea, E.R. and Galparsoro, J.M.P. A computer based simulation model for the prediction of evacuation from mass transport vehicles, Fire Safety J, 1994, 22, pp 341–366.Google Scholar
5. Galea, E.R., Owen, M. and Lawrence, P. Computer modelling of human behaviour in aircraft fire accidents, Toxicology, 1996, 115, (1-3), pp 63–78.Google Scholar
6. Galea, E.R., Owen, M. and Lawrence, P.J. The role of evacuation modelling in the development of safer air travel, Proceedings of NATO AGARD PEP 88th Meeting on Aircraft Fire Safety, Dresden, 14-17 October. 1996, pp 36.1-36.13, Published by AGARD, ISBN: 92-836-0046-0.Google Scholar
7. Galea, E.R., Owen, M., Lawrence, P.J. and Filippidis, L. The airEXODUS evacuation model and its application to evacuation certification, crew training and accident investigation, Proceedings of the Aircraft Cabin Safety Conference, 20-21 March 1997, pp 15.1–15.14, Published by The Royal Aeronautical Society, ISBN 1 85768 038 3.Google Scholar
8. Gouray, B.S. PC-Based simulation of the evacuation of passengers from a transport plane, In: Eleventh Annual International Aircraft Cabin Safety Symposium and Technical Conference, Sarozek, P.L. (Ed), 31 January- 5 February 1994. SCSI, Torrance, CA, pp 302–318.Google Scholar
9. Macey, P., Cordey-Hayes, M., Taylor, A.F. and Phillips, W.G.B. A Computer based simulation and risk assessment model for investigation of airliner fire safety, Proceedings of NATO AGARD PEP 88th Meeting on Aircraft Fire Safety, Dresden, 14-17 October 1996, ISBN: 92-836-0046-0.Google Scholar
10. Singh, K.R. and Zemen, F. Evacuation modelling: a graphical simulation approach, Presentation Slides from Royal Aeronautical Society Cabin Safety Conference, 20-21 March, 1997.Google Scholar
11. Folk, E.D., Garner, J.D., Cook, E.A. and Broadhurst, J.L. GPSS/360 computer models to simulate aircraft passenger emergency evacuation, FA A Report No. FAA-AM-72, September 1972.Google Scholar
12. Marcus, J.H. A review of computer evacuation models and their data needs, In Eleventh Annual International Aircraft Cabin Safety Symposium and Technical Conference, Sarozek, P.L. (Ed), 31 January-5 February 1994. Southern California Safety Institute, Torrance, CA, pp 282–300.Google Scholar
13. King, D. Report on the accident to Boeing 737-236 series 1, G-BGJL at Manchester International Airport on 22 August 1985. Aircraft Accident Report 8/88. HMSO London, 1988.Google Scholar
14. Burnett, J. NTSB Report: NTSB/AAR-84/09, Aircraft Accident Report (Air Canada, McDonnell Douglas DC-9, Flight 797, 2 June 1983, Greater Cincinnati International Airport, Covington, Kentucky), 8 August 1984.Google Scholar
15. Burnett, J. NTSB Report: NTSB/AAR-89/04, Aircraft Accident Report (Delta Airline Inc, Boeing 727, Flight 1141, 31 August 1988, Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport, Texas), 26 September 1989.Google Scholar
16. Diegel, R.P. NTSB Report: DCA-90-002, Survival Factors Group Chairman's Factual Report of Investigation (Delta Air Lines, Boeing 727, Flight 1558, 14 October 1989, Salt Lake City International Airport).Google Scholar
17. Hammack, G. NTSB Report: DCA-88-MA-072, Survival Factors Group Chairman's Factual Report of Investigation (Delta Air Line Inc, Boeing 727, flight 1141, 31 August 1988, Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport, Texas).Google Scholar
18. Hughes, H.F. NTSB Report: DC NTSB/AAR-91/08, Aircraft Accident Report (USAir and Skywest, Boeing 737 and Fairchild Metroliner, 1 February 1991, Los Angeles International Airport, Los Angeles, California), 22 October 1991.Google Scholar
19. Hughes, H.F. NTSB Report: DCA-94-MA-038, Survival Factors Group Factual Report of Investigation (Continental Airlines, McDonnell Douglas MD-82, flight 795, 2 March 1994, La Guardia Airport, Hushing, New York), 26 April 1994.Google Scholar
20. Hughes, H.F. NTSB Report: DCA-91-MA-018, Survival Factors Investigator's Report of Investigation (USAir and Skywest, B737 and Fairchild Metroliner, 1 February 1991, Los Angeles International Airport, Los Angeles, California), 10 June 1991.Google Scholar
21. King, J.B. NTSB Report: NTSB-SIR-81-4, Special Investigation Report (United Airlines, McDonnell Douglas DC-8, Flight 5820, 29 December 1980, Sky Harbour International Airport, Phoenix, Arizona), 9 September 1981.Google Scholar
22. Leroy, C.H. NTSB Report: (World Airways, McDonnell Douglas DC-10, Flight 30, 23 January 1982, Logan International Airport, Boston, Massachussetts), 9 April 1982.Google Scholar
23. Marshall, N.C. NTSB Report: Survival Factors Group Chairman's Report of Investigation (Continental Airlines, McDonnell Douglas DC-9, Flight 1713, 15 November 1987, Stapleton International Airport, Denver, Colorado).Google Scholar
24. Marshall, N.C. NTSB Report: DCA-88-MA-052, Survival Factors Specialist's Factual Report (Horizon Air, DHC-8-102, Flight 1199, 15 April 1988, Seattle-Tacoma International Airport, Washington).Google Scholar
25. Marshall, N.C. NTSB Report: DCA-88-RA-108, Survival Specialist's Factual Report of Interviews (Eastern Airlines, Boeing 757, Flight 918, 29 September 1988, San Jose, Costa Rica), 16 May 1989.Google Scholar
26. Marshall, N.C. NTSB Report: DCA-91-MA-019, Survival Factors Group Chairman's Factual Report of Investigation (USAir Express, BAe Jetstream 31, Flight 4743, 30 January 1991, Raleigh County Memorial Airport, West Virginia), 23 August 1991.Google Scholar
27. Marshall, N.C. NTSB Report: LAX-90-FA-061, Survival Factors Specialist's Report (America West Airlines, Boeing 737, Flight 450, 30 December 1989, Tuscon International Airport, Tuscon, Arizona), 16 October 1990.Google Scholar
28. Marshall, N.C. NTSB Report: NYC-86-FA-076, Survival Factors Specialist Factual Report (Eastern Airlines, Lockheed L1011, Flight 27, 15 February 1986, JFK International Airport, New York).Google Scholar
29. Marshall, N.C. and Weaver-Berry, , T NTSB Report: MKC88FA154, Survival Factors Specialist's Factual Report (United Airlines, Boeing 737, Flight 926, 10 August 1988, Little Rock, Arkansas), 19 December 1988.Google Scholar
30. McCormick, M.M. NTSB Report: DCA-77-AA-015, Human Factors Group Chairman's Factual Report (Southern Airways, McDonnell Douglas DC-9, Flight 242, 4 April 1977, New Hope, Georgia).Google Scholar
31. McCormick, M.M. NTSB Report: DCA-83-AA-011, Human Factors Group Chairman's Factual Report (Republic Airline, Convair CV-580, Flight 927, 9 January 1983, Brainerd, Minnesota) 2 March 1983.Google Scholar
32. McCormick, M.M. NTSB Report: DCA-85-AA-027, Human Factors Group Chairman's Factual Report (American Airlines, McDonnell Douglas DC-10, Flight 633, 27 June 1985, Luis Munoz Marin International Airport, Isla Verde, Carolina, PR) 20 November 1985.Google Scholar
33. Mudrowsky, E.F. NTSB Report: DCA-87-AA-O06, Survival Factors Group Chairman's Factual Report (Piedmont Airlines, Boeing 737, Flight 467, October 25, 1986, Charlotte/Douglass International Airport, Charlotte, North Carolina), 22 January 1987.Google Scholar
34. Vogt, C.W. NTSB Report: NTSB/AAR-94/01, Aircraft Accident Report (American Airlines, McDonnell Douglas DC-10, Flight 102, 14 April 1993, Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport, Texas), 14 February 1994.Google Scholar
35. Weaver-Berry, T.D. NTSB Report: DCA-89-MA-074, Survival Factors Group Chairman's Factual Report of Investigation (USAir, Boeing 737, Flight 5050, 20 September 1989, La Guardia Airport, Flushing, New York), 3 November 1989.Google Scholar
36. Wilson, R.L. NTSB Report: DCA-91-MA-010, Survival Factors Group Chairman's Factual Report (Northwest Airlines, Boeing 727 and McDonnell Douglas DC-9, Flight 299 and 1482, 3 December 1990, Detroit, Michigan), June 1991.Google Scholar
37. Wilson, R.L. NTSB Report: DCA-92-MA-044, Survival Factors Group Chairman's Factual Report (Trans World Airlines, Lockheed L1011, Flight 843, 30 July 1992, JFK International Airport), 1 October 1992.Google Scholar
38. Cherry, R.G.W. Analysis of factors influencing the survivability of passengers in aircraft accidents, Report presented to the commission of the European communities — Directorate General for Transport, R.G.W. Cherry & Associates, January 1995.Google Scholar
39. Ranter, H. The Aviation Safety Web Pages, http://www.pongnet.nl/avnsafety Google Scholar
40. Macey, P. The use of a holistic approach in the analysis and computer simulation of aircraft accident scenarios, Proceedings of Cabin Safety Conference, The Royal Aeronautical Society, March 1997, pp 12.1-12.8.Google Scholar
41. Schaefers, F. Passenger emergency exit usage in actual emergencies of jet airliners, 1960-1989, Paper presented at the European Cabin Safety Conference, Gatwick, London, September 1990.Google Scholar
42. Microsoft Access 97, Microsoft Corporation, 1997.Google Scholar
43. Muir, H. and Cobbett, A. Influence of cabin crew during emergency evacuations at floor level exits, Technical Report, CAA Paper 95006, Part A, 1996, ISBN 0 86039 649 5.Google Scholar
44. Muir, H. and Cobbett, A. Influence of cabin crew during emergency evacuations at floor level exits, Technical Report, CAA Paper 95006, Part B, 1996, ISBN 0 86039 649 5.Google Scholar
45. Muir, H., Marrison, C. and Evans, A. Aircraft evacuations: the effect of passenger motivation and cabin configuration adjacent to the exit, Technical Report, CAA Paper 89019, 1989, ISBN 0 86039 406 9.Google Scholar
46. Owen, M., Dixon, A. and Galea, E.R. 90 second trial data archive report. In preparation, 1997.Google Scholar
47. McLean, G.A. and George, M.H. Individual difference in efficiency of emergency egress from Type III overwing exits, Aviation, Space and Environmental Medicine, 1994, 64, (5), p 468.Google Scholar
48. Jin, T. and Yamada, T. Experimental study of human behaviour in smoke filled corridors, In: Proceedings of The Second International Symposium on Fire Safety Science, 1988, pp 511–519.Google Scholar
49. Purser, D.A. Toxicity assessment of combustion products, In: SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering, Beyler, C.L. (Ed), National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA, USA, 1988, 1-200-1-245.Google Scholar
50. Speitel, L. Fractional effective dose model for post-crash aircraft survivability, Toxicology, 1996, 115, (1-3), pp 167–177.Google Scholar