Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T06:41:56.936Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

X-ray Measurements of Surface Residual Stresses in Cold Rolled α-Brass

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

W. Wallace  and
T. Terada
W. Wallace
Affiliation:
National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, Canada
T. Terada
Affiliation:
National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, Canada
Get access

Abstract

Residual elastic stresses have been measured in cold rolled α-brass (30% zinc) using the available x-ray diffractometer methods. Residual stress values obtained by the two exposure and sin2ψ methods of stress analysis are compared with data obtained using Wagner's extrapolation method.

For deformations up to 50% reduction in thickness, tensile surface stresses prevailed, and in most cases could be detected by these methods. Uncertainty of the value of a0, the lattice parameter of the deformed' material, presents a serious limitation to the extrapolation technique. Using the approximation a0 = a0ann, residual stresses appear lower than, and frequently of opposite sign to those given by the two exposure method. In addition, lattice parameter variations in the near surface regions of the rolled sheet were opposite to those expected from the true macrostress distributions shown to exist by the two exposure method and by strain gauge techniques. The distributions of ahkl points in the extrapolation plots were in agreement with theory for a combination of anisotropic elastic stresses and low stacking fault density.

Type
Research Article
Information
Advances in X-Ray Analysis , Volume 14: Nineteenth Annual Conference on Applications of X-ray Analysis, August 5-7, 1970 , 1970 , pp. 389 - 407
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cullity, B.D., “Sources of Error in X-Ray Measurements of Residual Stress”, J. Appl. Phys. 35, 1915–1917 (1964).Google Scholar
Donachie, M.J. and Northon, J.T., “Lattice Strain and X-Ray Stress Measurement”, Trans. AIME 221, 962–967 (1961).Google Scholar
Ricklefs, R.E. and Evans, W.P., “Anomalous Residual Stress”, in Newkirk, J.B. and Mallett, G.R., Editors, Advances in X-Ray Analysis, Vol. 10, p. 273–283, Plenum Press, New York (1967).Google Scholar
Bollenrath, P.V., Hauk, V. and Wiedemann, W., “Explanation of Internal Lattice Deformation in Plastically Deformed α-Iron”, Arch. Eisenhuttenwesen 38, 793–800 (1957).Google Scholar
Wagner, C.N.J., Boisseau, J.P. and Aqua, E.N., “X-Ray Diffraction Study of Plastically Deformed Copper”, Trans. AIME 233, 1280–1286 (1965).Google Scholar
Paterson, M.S., “X-Ray Diffraction by Pace-Centered Cubic Crystals with Deformation Faults”, J. Appl. Phys. 23, 805–811 (1952).Google Scholar
Greenough, G.B., “Quantitative X-Ray Diffraction Observations on Strained Metal Aggregates”, Prog. Metal Phys. 3, 176–219 (1952).Google Scholar
Rayne, J.A., “Elastic Constants of α-Brasses: Room Temperature Variation with Solute Concentration”, Phys. Revs. 112, 1125–1129 (1958).Google Scholar
Otte, H.M., “Lattice Parameter Studies of Annealed, of Aged, and of Cold Worked Alpha Brass”, J. Appl. Phys. 33., 1436–1441 (1962).Google Scholar
Goodman, S.R. and Hu, Hsun, “Texture Development in Copper and 70-30 Brass”, Trans. AIME 242, 88–93 (1968).Google Scholar