Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T15:07:41.062Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

X-Ray Diffraction Observation of Fracture Surfaces of Ductile Cast Iron

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

Zenjiro Yajima
Affiliation:
Faculty of Engineering, Kanazawa Institute of Technology, 7-1 Oogigaoka, Nonoichi, Kanazawa 921, Japan
Yukio Hirose
Affiliation:
Faculty of Education* Kanazawa University, 1-1 Marunouchi, Kanazawa 920, Japan
Keisuke Tanaka
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering and Mechanics Lehigh University, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.
Get access

Extract

X-ray diffraction observation of metal fractures provides fracture analysists with useful information on the mechanisms and mechanical conditions of fracturing. This method is called “X-ray fractography” and has been developed especially in Japan as a new engineering tool for fracture analysis.

In the present paper, X-ray fractography is applied to fracture surfaces of ductile cast iron (JIS FCD 60) which are widely used as machine parts. The fracture toughness tests were conducted at ambient and low temperatures by using compact tension (CT) specimens with blunt notches and three-point bending (TPB) specimens with fatigue pre-cracks. The line broadening of X-ray diffraction profiles was measured on and beneath fracture surfaces of fracture toughness specimens.

Type
V. X-Ray Stress Determination, Position Sensitive Detectors, Fatigue and Fracture Characterization
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Committee on X-Ray Study on Mechanical Behavior of Materials, “X-Ray Fractography,” J. Soci. Mat. Sci. Jap., 31:244 (1982).Google Scholar
2. Taira, S., and Tanaka, K., “Fracture Surface Analysis by X-Ray Diffraction Techniques,” J. Iron and Steel Ins. Jap., 65:450 (1979).Google Scholar
3. ASTM Standard, “Standard Test Method for Flane-Strain Fracture Toughness of Metallic Materials,” Part 10,,E 399–81 (1981).Google Scholar
4. ASTM Standard, “Standard Test for JIC, A Measure of Fracture Toughness,” Part 10, E 813–81 (1981).Google Scholar
5. Yajima, Z., Hirose, Y., Tanaka, K., and Ogawa, H., “X-Ray Fractographic Study on Fracture Toughness of Ductile Cast Iron at Low Temperatures,” To be published in J. Jap. Soc. Strength and Fracture of Materials.Google Scholar
6. Yajima, Z., Hirose, Y., Tanaka, K., and Ogawa, H., “Fracture Toughness of Blunt-Notched CT Specimens of Ductile Cast Iron,“ To be published in J. Soci. Mat. Sci. Jap.Google Scholar
7. Tanaka, K., Fujiyama, K., and Nakamura, K., “Fracture Toughness and X-Ray Diffraction Observation of Fracture Surface of Structual Low-Carbon Steel,” J. Soci. Mat. Sci. Jap., :62 (1980).Google Scholar
8. Goto, T., “A Study on the Application of X-Ray Diffraction Technique to Failure Analysis of Metal Components,” Proc. 1973 Symp. Mech. Beh. Mat., Kyoto, 265 (1973).Google Scholar
9. Yajima, Z., Hirose, Y., and Tanaka, K., “X-Ray Diffraction Observation of Fractured Surface of Fracture Toughness Specimen of High Strength Steel,” J. Jap. Soc. Strength and Fracture of Materials, 16:59 (1981).Google Scholar
10. Levy, N., Marcal, P.V., Gstergren, W.J., and Rice, J.R., “Small Seal Yielding Near a Crack in Plane Strain:A Finite Element Analysis,” Int. J. Frac. Mech., 7:l43 (1971).Google Scholar
11. Rice, J. R., “Fracture,” Liebowitz, H., ed., II, 191, Academic Press, New York (1968).Google Scholar