Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T11:51:40.787Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Stress Evaluation on Materials Having Non-Linear Lattice Strain Distributions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

Viktor M. Hauk
Viktor M. Hauk*
Affiliation:
Institut für Werkstoffkunde, Rhein. Westf., Technische Hochschule, D-5100 Aachen, Bundesrepublik Deutschland
Get access

Abstract

The state of the art of stress evaluation on materials having non-linear lattice strain distributions is presented.

New results on heterogeneous materials with measurements conducted on both phases of the material show compensation of the shear stress components σ13 in ground surface layers of (α+β) brass. There is only the compensation of normal components σ11 of (α+γ) steel after plastic straining.

The fundamental aspects and the evaluation of macro- and microresidual stresses on materials having preferred orientation are broadened. The use of Mo-Ka-radiation shows linear lattice strain distributions, as a result of minimizing the influence of micro residual stresses causing oscillations. The interplanar distance- or strain-polefigure shows similarities with the intensity polefigure.

The knowledge of the theoretical influence of stress distribution with depth from the surface of the material is extended. The experimental procedure should use either different radiations having different penetration depths or a low-penetrating radiation in combination with removal of surface layers.

Type
II. X-Ray Strain and Stress Determination
Information
Advances in X-Ray Analysis , Volume 27: Thirty-Second Annual Conference on Applications of X-ray Analysis, August 1-5, 1983 , 1983 , pp. 101 - 120
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Dolle, H. and Hauk, V., System of possible lattice strain distributions on mechanically loaded metallic materials (in German), I. Metallkde. 68:725 (1977).Google Scholar
2. Hauk, V. and Vaessen, G., Evaluation of non-linear lattice strain distribution (in German), in:“Eigenspannungen und Lastspannungen, Moderne Ermittlung-Ergebnisse-Bewertung”, Edited by Hauk, V. and Macherauch, E., HTM-Beiheft Carl Hanser Verlag Munchen Wien:38 (1982).Google Scholar
3. Evenschor, P. D. and Hauk, V., On non-1inear distributions of lattice interplanar spacing at X-ray strain measurements (in German), Z. Metallkde. 66:167 (1975),Google Scholar
4. Dolle, H. and Hauk, V., Evaluation of residual stress systems arbitrarily oriented by X-rays (in German), HIM 31:165(1976).Google Scholar
5. Hauk, V., Krug, W. K., G. Vaessen and Weisshaupt, H., The residual strain-/stress-condition after grinding (in German), HTM 35:144 (1980).Google Scholar
6. Hauk, V. and Kockelmann, H., X-ray elastic constants of ferritic, austenitic and hardened steels (in German), Arch. Eisenhuttenwes. 50:347 (1979).Google Scholar
7. Hauk, V., X-ray elastic constants (XEC) (in German), same as 2:49 (1982).Google Scholar
8. Hauk, V., Stuitje, P. J. T. and Vaessen, G., Presentation and compensation of residual stresses in machined surface layers of heterogeneous materials (in German), same as 2:129 (1982).Google Scholar
9. Broszeit, E., Hauk, V. Kloos, K. H. and Stuitje, P. J. T., to be Published.Google Scholar
10. Dolle, H. and Cohen, J. B., Residual stresses in ground steels, Metallurgical Transaction 11 A:159 (1980).Google Scholar
11. Krause, H. and Juhe, H., Contribution to X-ray evaluation and assessment of systems of residual stresses of friction loaded surfaces (in German), in:“Eigenspannungen, Entstehung-Berechnung-Messung-Bewertung”, Deutsche Ges. Fur Metallkunde, Oberursel:121 (1980).Google Scholar
12. Hauk, V. and Stuitje, P. J. T., Residual stresses in the phases of heterogeneous materials after machining (in German), Symposium Karlsruhe (1983), in press.Google Scholar
13. Hauk, V., Oudelhoven, R. and Vaessen, G., On the state of residual stresses after grinding (in German), HTM 36:258 (1981).Google Scholar
14. Hanabusa, T. and Fujiwara, H., On the relation betweentp-spiitting and microscopic residual shear stresses in unidirectionally deformed surfaces, same as 2:209 (1982).Google Scholar
15. Krause, H. and Mathias, M., Strain measurement on the cementite and ferrite-phase after different machining of surfaces (in German), to be published.Google Scholar
16. Hauk, V., Schneider, E. Stuitje, P. and Theiner, W., Comparison of different methods to determine residual stresses nondestructively, in “New Procedures in Nondestructive Testing”, Edited by Holler, P., Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York:561 (1983).Google Scholar
17. Hauk, V., Residual stresses by deformation (in German), same as 2:92 (1982).Google Scholar
18. Hauk, V. and Krug, W. K., Superposition of load-and residual stresses, fundamental tests (in German) same as 2:133 (1982)Google Scholar
19. Hauk, V., Residual stresses, their importance for science and technique (in German), Symposium Karlsruhe (1983), in the press.Google Scholar
20. Hauk, V., Krug, W. K. and Pintschovius, L., to be published.Google Scholar
21. Hauk, V. and Sesemann, H., Deviations from linear distributions of lattice interplanar spacings in cubic metals and their relation to stress measurement by X-rays (in German), Z. Metallkde. 67:646 (1976).Google Scholar
22. Dcjlle, H. and Hauk, V., Influence of mechanical anisotropy of polycrystalls (texture) upon the X-ray stress determination (in German), Z. Metallkde. 69:410 (1978).Google Scholar
23. Dcjlle, H., tf. Hauk and Zegers, H., Calculated and measured XEC and lattice strain distributions in textured steels (in German), Z. Metallkde. 69:766 (1978).Google Scholar
24. Dcjlle, H. and Hauk, V., Evaluation of residual stresses in textured materials by X-rays (in German), Z. Metallkde. 70:682 (1979).Google Scholar
25. Hauk, V. and Kockelmann, H., Calculation of the distribution of the intensity and the lattice strain out of inverse polefigures, Z. Metallkde. 69:16 (1978). Hauk, V. and Kockelmann, H., Lattice strain distribution of plastically deformed specimens of pure and silver alloyed copper (in German), Z. Metallkde. 71:303 (1980).Google Scholar
26. Brakman, C. M., Residual stresses in cubic materials with orthorhombic or monoclinic specimen symmetry; Influence of texture on ij)-spl itting and non-linear behaviour, J. Appl. Cryst. 16:325 (1983).Google Scholar
27. Bollenrath, F., Hauk, V. and Weidemann, U., To the interpretation of lattice residual stresses in plastically deformed ferrite (in German), Arch. Eisenhlittenwes. 38:793 (1967).Google Scholar
28. Shiraiwa, T. and Sakamoto, Y., The X-ray stress measurement of the deformed steel having preferred orientation, The 13th Oap. Congr. on Mater. Res.-Metal. Mater.:25 (1970).Google Scholar
29. Hauk, V., D. Herlach and Sesemann, H., Non linear distributions of lattice interplanar spacings in steels, their origin, calculation and their relation to stress measurement (in German), Z. Metallkde. 66:734 (1975).Google Scholar
30. Marion, R. H. and Cohen, O. B., Anomalies in measurement of residual stress by X-ray diffractions, Adv. X-Ray Anal. 18:466 (1975).Google Scholar
31. Willemse, P. F., Naughton, B. P. and Verbraak, C. A., X-ray residual stress measurements on cold-drawn steel wire, Mat. Science Engg. 56:25 (1982).Google Scholar
32. Evenschor, P. D. and Hauk, V., X-ray elastic constants and distributions of interplanar spacings of materials with preferred orientation (in German), Z. Metallkde. 66:164 (1975).Google Scholar
33. Hauk, V. and Vaessen, G., to be published.Google Scholar
34. Hauk, V. and Vaessen, G., X-ray stress evaluation on steels having preferred orientation (in German), Symposium Karlsruhe (1983), in press.Google Scholar
35. Hauk, V., X-ray methods for measuring residual stress, in “Residual stress and stress relaxation”, Edited by Kula, E. and Weiss, V., Plenum Press New York and London:117 (1982).Google Scholar
36. Dolle, H. and Hauk, V., The theoretical influence of multiaxial depth-dependent residual stresses upon the stress measurement by X-rays (in German), HTM 34:272 (1979).Google Scholar
37. Noyan, I. C., Effect of gradients in multiaxial stress states on residual stress measurements with X-rays, Metallurgical Transactions 14 A:249 (1983),Google Scholar
38. Sprauel, J. M., M. Barral and Torbaty, S., Measurement of stress gradients by X-ray diffraction, Adv. X-Ray Anal., in press.Google Scholar
39. Hauk, V. and Krug, W. K., to be published.Google Scholar
40. Shiraiwa, T. and Sakamoto, Y., X-ray stress measurement and its application to steel, Sumitomo Search 7:109 (1972).Google Scholar
41. Melker, A. I. and Pavlova, V. G., Determination of residual stresses with a gradient by means of X-ray diffraction (Translation from Russian), Ind. Lab. 42:376 (1976).Google Scholar
42. Hauk, V., Oudelhoven, R. and Vaessen, G., The state of residual stress in the near surface region of homogeneous and heterogeneous materials after grinding, Metallurgical Transactions 13 A:1239 (1982).Google Scholar
43. In meantime the paper, Equilibrium conditions for the average stresses measured by X-rays by I. C. Noyan was published in Metallurgical Transactions 14 A September:1907 (1983).Google Scholar