Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T02:23:05.609Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Statistical Comparison of Data Obtained from Pressed Disk and Fused Bead Preparation Techniques for Geological Samples

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

Randall H. Dow*
Affiliation:
School of Oceanography Oregon State University Corvallis, OR 97331
Get access

Abstract

The analysis of geological samples by x-ray fluorescence analysis is complicated by matrix effects and sample variability. Diluting the sample in a suitable matrix such as lithium tetraborate and then fusing it helps to reduce problems associated with sample inhomogeneities and reduces matrix effects considerably.

Unfortunately, many of the trace elements in the sample can be diluted below their detection limits by this technique. Pressing the ground powder into a hard disk avoids this problem and is less time consuming. Matrix effects can be very serious however, but can be calculated and compensated for by fundamental parameters programs.

Type
III. XRF Applications: Mineral and Geological
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)