Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T11:46:24.416Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Single Crystal Vs. The Powder Method for Identification of Crystalline Materials

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

Alan D. Mighell
Alan D. Mighell*
Affiliation:
National Bureau of Standards Washington, D.C. 20234
Get access

Abstract

Single crystal X-ray diffraction methods for the study of crystalline materials, although reliable, have been, mainly confined to the academic laboratory because of the rather lengthy and complex procedure necessary to determine the unit cell and the space group. The situation has now changed. Several recent developments give single-crystal methods considerable potential for routine Industrial use. They Include growth of the data base, advances in lattice theory, and automation of the single-crystal X-ray diffractometer. To identify an unknown, one can start with a single crystal, mount it on the diffractometer, determine a refined primitive cell, reduce the cell, and check against a file of known reduced cells. The entire procedure can be automated. As a result, the single-crystal X-ray diffraction method can now complement the powder method for the routine analysis of crystalline materials.

Type
X-Ray Powder Diffraction
Information
Advances in X-Ray Analysis , Volume 20: Twenty-Fifth Annual Conference on Applications of X-ray Analysis, August 4-6, 1976 , 1976 , pp. 53 - 62
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Donnay, J.D.H. and Werner, Nowacki, Crystal Data. Classification of Substances by Space Groups and their Identification from Cell Dimensions, Geological Society of America Memoir 60, New York. (1954).Google Scholar
2. Donnay, J.D.H., Gabrielle, Donnay, Cox, E. G., Olga, Kennard, and King, M. V., Crystal Bata, Determinative Tables, 2nd Ed., American Crystallographic Association Monograph Number 5, (1963).Google Scholar
3. Donnay, J.D.H. and Helen M., Ondik, Crystal Data. Determinative Tables: Third Edition, Vol. 1 and 2, U.S. Department of Commerce, National Bureau of Standards, and the Joint Committee on Powder Diffraction Standards (1972, 1973).Google Scholar
4. Mighell, A. D., Santoro, A., and Donnay, J.D.H., “Reduced Cells”, International Tables for X-ray Crystallography, Vol. 1, 530–535, Birmingham: Kynoch Press (1969).Google Scholar
5. Mighell, A. D., Santoro, A. and Donnay, J.D.H., “Errata in International Tables for X-ray Crystallography,” Acta Cryst.B27, 1837–1838(1971).Google Scholar
6. Parthé, E. and Hornstra, J., “Corrections to the Tables” in Chapter 5.1 given in the 1969 Edition of Vol. 1 of International Tables, Acta Cryst. A29, 309 (1973).Google Scholar