Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T09:26:43.689Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Residual Stresses in Unidirectional Al2O3 Fiber/Silicate Glass Composites by X-ray Diffraction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

Lucien Hehn  and
Paul Predecki
Lucien Hehn
Affiliation:
Engineering Department, University of Denver, Denver CO
Paul Predecki
Affiliation:
Engineering Department, University of Denver, Denver CO
Get access

Abstract

Unidirectional continuous fiber composites fabricated from 20 μm diameter α-AI2O3 fibers (duPont FP) and 5 different silicate glass matrices (Corning 9013 and 7740, Owns Illinois N51A and Schott 8229 and 8228) were examined for residual strain and stress in the fibers using x-ray diffraction and the results compared with the predictions of two simple residual stress models. The glasses were chosen to have thermal expansion coefficients ranging from 1.3 to 10.2 x 10-6 /°C, compared with 7.2 x 10-6 /°C for the fiber, so as to produce a range of residual stresses. The magnitudes of the measured normal strains and stresses increased with increasing fiber/matrix thermal expansion mismatch in the order expected except for the sample containing Corning glass 7740 which showed extensive microcracking. Small shear strains were also detected in most of the samples due to the fibers not lying precisely along the presumed uniaxial direction. Agreement with the models was qualitative only but revealed that the residual stresses in the samples containing Corning 7740 and Schott 8229 glasses were substantially less than expected, possibly due to microcracking and/or fiber degradation.

Type
XII. Analysis of Stress and Fracture by Diffraction Methods
Information
Advances in X-Ray Analysis , Volume 34: Thirty-Ninth Annual Conference on Applications of X-ray Analysis, July 30 - August 3, 1990 , 1990 , pp. 669 - 677
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Michalske, T. A. and Hellmann, J. R.. “Strength and Toughness of Continuous- Alumina-Fiber-Reinforced Glass-Matrix Composites.” J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 71(9): 725–731 (1988).Google Scholar
[2] Romine, J. C. “New High-Temperature Ceramic Fiber,” Ceram. Eng. Sci. Proc. 8: 755–765 (1987).Google Scholar
[3] Cohen, J. B., H. Dolle and James, M. R.. “Stress Analysis from Powder Diffraction Patterns.” National Bureau of Standards Special Publication 567: 453–477 (1980).Google Scholar
[4] Dolle, H. “The Influence of Multiaxial Stress States, Stress Gradients and Elastic Anisotropy on the Evaluation of (Residual) Stresses by X-Rays.” J. Appl. Cryst. 12: 489–501 (1979).Google Scholar
[5] Rudnick, P. and Cohen, J. B., (1985). Errors Due to Counting Statistics in the Triaxial Strain (Stress) Tensor Determined by Diffraction. Adv. in X-Ray Analysis. 29: 79–88.Google Scholar
[6] Kurita, M., Ihara, I. and Saito, A.. Diffraction Plane Dependence of X-Ray Elastic Constants of Alumina. Adv. in X-Ray Analysis. 33: 363–372 (1990).Google Scholar
[7] Taya, M. and Arsenault, R. J.. Basic Mechanical Behavior, Metal Matrix Composites. Pergamon Press: 103–105 (1989).Google Scholar
[8] Hsueh, C. H., Becher, P. F. and P. Angelini. “Effects of Interfacial Films on Thermal Stresses in Whisker-Reinforced Ceramics.” J. Am. Ceramic Soc. 71: 929–933 (1988).Google Scholar