Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T15:17:51.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Phase Analysis of Portland Cement by Full Profile Standardless Quantitative X-Ray Diffraction - Accuracy and Precision

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

J.C. Taylor  and
L.P. Aldridge
J.C. Taylor
Affiliation:
CSIRO Division of Coal and Energy Technology Lucas Heights Research Laboratories PMB 7, Menai, NSW, 2234, Australia
L.P. Aldridge
Affiliation:
Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation Lucas Heights Research Laboratories PMB 1, Menai, NSW, 2234, Australia
Get access

Abstract

The multiphase Rietveld method has been used in the determination of phase abundance in six standard Portland cements, using the SIROQUANT personal computer software package for XRD quantitative analysis. Because of the extreme amount of line superposition and weakness of the cement patterns care must be taken in the selection of standard XRD profiles and in the refinement of unit cell dimensions and linewidths. Comparison with round-robin microscope assays of the same cements shows r.m.s. deviations of assays between the two methods of 2.1% for alite, 3.1% for belite, 1.7% for aluminate and 1.3% for ferrite. Precision, studied by repeated SIROQUANT analyses of nine XRD patterns from the same Australian cement show esd's of 1.3% for the alite assay, 0.8% for belite, 0.5% for aluminate and 0.5% for ferrite.

Type
VI. Whole Pattern Fitting, Phase Analysis by Diffraction Methods
Information
Advances in X-Ray Analysis , Volume 36: Forty-First Annual Conference on Applications of X-ray Analysis, August 3-7, 1992 , 1992 , pp. 309 - 314
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Aldridge, L.P. (1982a). Cement and Concrete Research, 12, 381–398.Google Scholar
2. Aldridge, L.P. (1982b). Cement and Concrete Research, 12, 437–446.Google Scholar
3. Rietveld, H.M. (1969) J. Appl. Cryst, 2, 65–71.Google Scholar
4. Hill, R.J. and Howard, C.J. (1987). J. Appl. Cryst., 20, 467–474.Google Scholar
5. Bish, D.L. and Howard, S.A. (1988). J. Appl. Cryst, 21, 86–91.Google Scholar
6. O'Connor, B.J. and Raven, M.D. (1988). Powder Diffraction, 3, 2–6.Google Scholar
7. Taylor, J.C. (1991). Powder Diffraction, 6, 2–9.Google Scholar
8. Fayos, J., and Perez-Mendez, M. (1986). Amer. Ceram. Soc. Bull., 65, 1191–1195.Google Scholar
9. Golovastikov, R., Matveeva, R.G. and Belov, N.V. (1975). Sov. Phys. Crystallogr., 20, 441–445. Google Scholar
10. Nishi, F. and Takeuchi, Y. (1985). Zeit.fur Krist., 172, 297–314.Google Scholar
11. Taylor, J.C. and Clapp, R.A. (1992). Advances in X-Ray Analysis, 35, (in press).Google Scholar
12. Taylor, J.C. and Rui, Zhu. (1992). Powder Diffraction (in press).Google Scholar
13. Taylor, J.C. and Aldridge, L.P. (1992). To be submitted to Powder Diffraction.Google Scholar
14. Jost, K.H., Zeimer, B. and Seydel, R. (1977). Acta Cryst., B33, 1696–1700.Google Scholar
15. Mondal, P. and Jeffery, J.W. (1975). Acta Cryst., B37, 689–697.Google Scholar
16. Nishi, F. and Takeuchi, Y. (1975). Acta Cryst., B31, 1169–1173.Google Scholar
17. Takeuchi, Y., Nishi, F. and Maki, I. (1980). Zeit. fur Krist., 152, 259–307.Google Scholar
18. Cervantes Lee, F. and Glasser, F.P. (1979). J. Appl. Cryst, 12, 407–410.Google Scholar
19. Colville, A.A. and Geller, S. (1972). Acta Cryst. B28. 3196–3200.Google Scholar