Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T04:51:58.884Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the Determination of Preferred Orientation in Ferritic Steels

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

John A. Slane  and
Frank Hultgren
John A. Slane
Affiliation:
Republic Steel Corporation, Research Center, Independence, Ohio
Frank Hultgren
Affiliation:
Republic Steel Corporation, Research Center, Independence, Ohio
Get access

Abstract

A new approach to the analysis of preferred orientation in body centered cubic sheet materials is presented. The technique utilizes normalized extended inverse pole figures (2θ = 16 to 150°) taken in the plane normal, rolling, and transverse directions. Possible texture components are defined to be all unique sets of three mutually orthogonal crystallographic planes included in the diffraction pattern up to 150° 2θ for a total of 56 possible components. A computer program has been developed to calculate the contributions of various texture components relative to the three principal directions by two computer implemented algorithms, probability and successive decrementation. The two methods exhibit an apparent high correlation.

The calculated results are compared to monochromated direct pole figures for a highly textured material. The agreement is excellent.

Type
Research Article
Information
Advances in X-Ray Analysis , Volume 14: Nineteenth Annual Conference on Applications of X-ray Analysis, August 5-7, 1970 , 1970 , pp. 231 - 242
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cullity, B. D., Elements of X-Ray Diffraction, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1956.Google Scholar
Harris, G. B., “Quantitative Measurement of Preferred Orientation in Rolled Uranium Bars”, Phil. Mag., 43: 113–125, 1952.Google Scholar
Jetter, L. K., McHargue, C. J., and Williams, R. O., “Method of Representing Preferred Orientation Data”, J. Appl. Phys., 27: 368–374, 1956.Google Scholar
Bunge, H. J., “A Remark on the Representation of Sheet Textures Through Three Inverse Pole Figures”, Z. Metallkunde, 56: 378–379, 1965.Google Scholar
Jetter, L. K. and Borie, B. S. Jr., “A Method for the Quantitative Determination of Preferred Orientation”, J. Appl. Phys., 24: 532–535, 1953.Google Scholar
Williams, R. O., “The Representation of the Textures of Rolled Copper, Brass, and Aluminum by Biaxial Pole Figures”, Trans. AIME, 242: 105–115, 1968 Google Scholar