Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T14:56:54.152Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Measuring Residual and Applied Stress using X-Ray Diffraction on Materials with Preferred Orientation and Large Grain Size

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

James Pineault
Affiliation:
Proto Manufacturing Ltd., Oldcastle, Ontario
Michael Brauss
Affiliation:
Proto Manufacturing Ltd., Oldcastle, Ontario
Get access

Abstract

One of the most difficult tasks in applied and residual stress measurement of polycrystalline materials using x-ray diffraction is dealing with preferred orientation and large grain size.

A common solution to large grain size problems has been to choose a larger aperture, but in certain cases this is undesirable and/or impossible. When preferred orientation has been identified as the problem, the common approach has been to choose another diffraction plane or oscillate the x-ray diffraction head during data collection. Remedies such as these can distort the peak breadth and are often not sufficient to totally negate the grain size and preferred orientation effects.

A technique described as the “step scan with virtual window” has been developed jointly at MTL (formerly Canmet) and Proto Mfg. Ltd. to deal specifically with the aforementioned effects of grain size and preferred orientation.

This paper highlights some of the problems that arise in stress analysis of materials exhibiting preferred orientation and large grain size. Subsequently a comparison of the results obtained using standard diffraction technique, oscillation and the “step scan with virtual window” is made.

Type
IX. Stress and Strain Determination by Diffraction Methods, Peak Broadening Analysis
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. James, M. R., “The Use of Oscillation on PSD-Based Instruments for X-Ray Measurements of Residual Stress”, Experimental Mechanics, Vol. 27, No, 2, 164167, 1987.Google Scholar
2. Noyan, I. C., Cohen, J. B., “Residual Stress Measurement by Diffraction and Interpretation”, Springer-Verlag New York Inc., 1987.Google Scholar
3. Cullity, B. D., “The Elements of X-Ray Diffraction”, 2nd Edition, Addison-Wesley, Reading., 1978.Google Scholar
4. Shin, S. W., “Retained Austenite and Its Measurements by X-Ray Diffraction”, SAE/SP-80/453, Section 4, Warrendale PA, 1980.Google Scholar
5. Mitchell, C. M., “Stress Measurements by X-Ray Diffractometry”, United States Patent Number 4,561,062, 1985.Google Scholar
6. Klug, H. P., Alexander, L. E., “X-Ray Diffraction Procedures”, 2nd Edition, Wiley-Interscience, U.S.A., 1974.Google Scholar