Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T14:17:21.490Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

FPXRF, EDXRF and ICP Comparison of Pb Contaminated Soils From Leadville, Colorado

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

C.A. Kuharic
Affiliation:
Lockheeed Environmental Systems and Technologies Company Las Vegas, Nevada, USA
W.H. Cole
Affiliation:
Lockheeed Environmental Systems and Technologies Company Las Vegas, Nevada, USA
Get access

Abstract

Field portable x-ray fluorescence (FPXRF) has been used as a tool in the environmental industry to characterize metals contaminated soils for about 10 years. Initially, due to the level of sophistication of the equipment (ambient temperature detectors and empirical calibration spectral processing), and the complexity of soil matrices, it was generally believed that the instrumentation could only produce semiquantitative data. As the level of instrument sophistication increased (cooled solid-state detectors and Fundamental Parameters), that perception of FPXRF changed. However, not all users have access to the latest, state-of-the-art instrumentation. Work performed at Leadville, Colorado provides an example of how properly used older instrumentation can produce data of good quality (Kuharic, et al., 1993).

Type
IX. XRS Mathematical Methods, Trace Analysis and Other Applications
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Kuharic, C.A., Cole, W.H., Singh, A.K., and Gonzales, D., 1993. An X-Ray Fluorescence Survey of Lead Contaminated Residential Soils in Leadville, Colorado - A Case Study, EPA/600/R-93/073. Washington, D.C. Google Scholar