Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T15:55:47.167Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Fluorine Implantation and Residual Stresses in Polysilicon Films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

Lyan Lowry
Affiliation:
Jet Propulsion Laboratory 4800 Oak Grove Drive Pasadena, CA 91109-8099
Paul Zschack
Affiliation:
ORISE-Brookhaven National Laboratory Upton, NY 11973-5000
Robert De Angelis
Affiliation:
University of Nebraska-Lincoln Center for Materials Research and Analysis Lincoln, NE 68588-0656
Get access

Abstract

X-ray diffraction techniques were utilized to study the film stress effects in silicon wafers subjected to several processing conditions. The wafer processing matrix consisted of three thicknesses of polysilicon deposited on (100) silicon with a 25 nm layer of Si02. The polysilicon was doped with phosphorous and arsenic after which the samples were implanted with fluorine at 30 KeV at a dose of 6 × 1015 cm2. A synchrotron radiation source at Brookhaven National Laboratory on beamline X-14 was employed to determine the residual stresses in the polysilicon film by a powder diffraction technique ordinarily used on poly crystal line material X-ray rocking curve experiments were employed to determine the stress in the film from measurements of the curvature of the substrate. These two stress measurements allow the estimation of the stress gradient in the intermediate amorphous oxide layer. Correlations are made between the stress gradients, the fluorine distribution in the wafer and the electrical characteristics of the structures.

Type
III. Applications of Diffraction to Semiconductors and Films
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Sze, S. M.: “VLSI Technology“; McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York (1988) 481.Google Scholar
2. Nishioka, Y. et al., IEEE Electron Device Letters; 9 (1988) 38.Google Scholar
3. Wright, P. J. et al., IEEE Trans. Electron Devices; 36 (1989) 879.Google Scholar
4. MacWillians, K. P., Lowiy, L. E.: IEEE Electron Devices; 11 (1990) 3.Google Scholar
5. Bai, G. and M-A Nicolet: J.Appl.Phys; 70 (1991) 3551.Google Scholar
6. Bai, G.; Private Communication.Google Scholar
7. Paul A.|Flinn and Chien Chiang: I. Appl. Phys., 67 (1990) 2927.Google Scholar
8. Kuo, H. K., Ganesan, P. and De Angelis, R. J., Microstructural Science, 8 (1980) 311.Google Scholar
9. Ganesan, P., Saavedra, A. and De Angelis, R. J.: J. Catalysis, 52 (1978) 310.Google Scholar
10. Vreeland, T. Jr. and Paine, B. M.; Vac. Sci. Technol. A; 4 (1986) 3153.Google Scholar
11. Vreeland, T. Jr. Dommann, A., Tsai, C.I. and Nicolet, M-A.; Proc. M.R.S.; 130 (1989) 3.Google Scholar
12. Stoney, G. G., Proc. Roy. Soc. A (London), 46 (1969) 172.Google Scholar
13. Noyan, I. C. and Goldsmith, C. C.: Adv. X-Ray Anal; 33 (1990) 137.Google Scholar
14. Grunthaner, F. J., Grunthaner, P.J. and Maserjian, J.: IEEE Trans.Nuc.Soc; 29 (1982) 1462.Google Scholar
15. Wolf, Helmut F.: “Semiconductors“; Publisher Wiley-Interscience, New York; (1971) 128.Google Scholar