Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T22:15:53.320Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evaluation of a Combined Transmission and Scattering Approach to Composition Imaging of Industrial Samples

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

T. H. Prettyraan ,
R. P. Gardner ,
J. C. Russ  and
K. Verghese
T. H. Prettyraan
Affiliation:
Center for Engineering Applications of Radioisotopes Box 7909, North Carolina State University Raleigh, North Carolina 27695-7909
R. P. Gardner
Affiliation:
Center for Engineering Applications of Radioisotopes Box 7909, North Carolina State University Raleigh, North Carolina 27695-7909
J. C. Russ
Affiliation:
Center for Engineering Applications of Radioisotopes Box 7909, North Carolina State University Raleigh, North Carolina 27695-7909
K. Verghese
Affiliation:
Center for Engineering Applications of Radioisotopes Box 7909, North Carolina State University Raleigh, North Carolina 27695-7909
Get access

Extract

Composition imaging of industrial samples has been reported using dual energy and multiple energy transmission computed tomography [1,2]. The simplest approach utilizes monoenergetic sources to obtain tomographs of a sample at two different energies. Each tomograph represents the linear attenuation coefficient distribution of the sample at the given source energy.

Type
XV. X-Ray Imaging and Tomography
Information
Advances in X-Ray Analysis , Volume 35 , Issue B: First Pacific-International Congress on X-ray Analytical Methods (PICXAM). Fortieth Annual Conference on Applications of X-ray Analysis, August 7-16, 1991 , 1991 , pp. 1235 - 1241
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Engler, P., Friedman, W. D., and Armstrong, E. E. (1989), “Determination of Material Composition using Dual Energy Computed Tomography on a Medical Scanner”, Proceedings of Industrial Computerized Tomography Topical, ASNT, July 1989, 142-145.Google Scholar
2. Schneberk, D. J., Martz, H., and Azevedo, S. (1991), “Multiple-Energy Techniques in Industrial Corauterized Tomography”, Review af Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation, Vol. 9.Google Scholar
3. Hubbel, J. H. (1969), “Photon Cross Sections, Attenuation Coefficients, and Energy Absorption Coefficients from 10 KeV to 100 GeV”, NSRDS-NBS 29.Google Scholar
4. Harding, G., “On the Sensitivity and Application Possibilities of a Novel Compton Scatter Imaging System”, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, NS-29, no. 3, (1982) 1260–1265.Google Scholar
5. Gardner, R. P., Ely, R. L. Jr. (1967), Radioisotope Measurement Applications in Engineering, Reinhold Publishing Corporation, New York, pp. 262–264.Google Scholar
6. Prettyman, T. H., Gardner, R. P., and Verghese, K. (1990), “MCPT: A Monte Carlo Code for Simulation of Photon Transport in Tomographic Scanners”, Nuct. Insir. and Meth. in Phys. Res., A299, 516–523.Google Scholar
7. Kondic, N. (1983), “Three-Dimensional Density Field Determination by External Stationary Detectors and Gamma Sources using Selective Scattering”, Proc. of the 2nd International Topical Meeting on Nuclear Reactor Thermal-Hydraulics, American Nuclear Society, Vol. II, pp. 1443-1455.Google Scholar