Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T01:42:04.406Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Electrolytic Isolation and the X-Ray Study of Micro-constituents in Steels

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

Kenneth W. Andrews
Affiliation:
United Steel Companies, Limited, Rotherham, England
Hugh Hughes
Affiliation:
United Steel Companies, Limited, Rotherham, England
Get access

Abstract

The identification of phases in solid steel specimens is subject to well known limitations. With suitable techniques, however, phases present in exceedingly small amounts can be isolated and identified. The work to be described is represented by three main stages.

  • 1. The techniques of isolation. The aim has been simplicity with the maximum efficiency of separation. Simple open and closed type cells are used and a few selected electrolytes for different conditions.

  • 2. The second stage is the identification of the separated particles. The X-ray photographs do, however, provide a considerable amount of other data which are often as important as the identity of the constituents. Thus, information can be obtained about the shape and size of particles and lattice spacing changes in solid solution phases. A supplementary determination of the solid solution content of the matrix is often useful.

  • 3. The third stage involves the interpretation of the results in relation to the strength and other properties of the steel or alloy. Here such questions arise as the effects of particular carbides or intermetallic phases, solid solution hardening and the times involved in various reactions and their relation to creep, etc.

A number of examples are given and some limitations noted.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1957

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Houdremont, E., Klinger, P. and Blaschczyz, G., Archive, für das Eisenhüttenwesen, 1941, vol. 15, p. 257.Google Scholar
2. Klmger, P. aud Koch, W., Stahlü, Eisen 1948, vol. 68, p. 1.Google Scholar
3. Blickwede, D. J. and Cohen, M., Trans. A.I.M.E., 1948, vol. 185, p. 578.Google Scholar
4. Gulyaev, A. P., Zavodskaya Laboratoriya, 1946, vol. 12, p. 9.Google Scholar
5. Popova, N. M. and Rybina. M. F., Zavodskaya Laboratoriya, 1948, vol. 14, p. 555.Google Scholar
6. Pemberton, R., Analyst, 1952, vol. 77, p. 287.Google Scholar
7. Heiskanen, S., Jernkontorets Annaler, 1955, vol. 139, p. 78.Google Scholar
8. Fisher, R. M., A.S.T.M. Spec. Tech. Pubn. 1953, No. 155, p. 49.Google Scholar
9. Booker, G. R. and Norbury, J., British Jnl. App. Phys. 1957, vol. 8, p. 154.Google Scholar
10. Booker, G. R., Norbury, J. and Sutton, A. L., Brit. Jnl. App. Phys., 1957, vol. 8, p. 154.Google Scholar
11. Rose, A., and Peter, W., Stahl ü Eisen, 1952, vol. 72, p. 1063.Google Scholar
12. Kuo, K., Jnl. Iron and Steel Inst., 1953, vol. 173, p. 363.Google Scholar
13. Kuo, K. and Holtgren, A., Jernkontorets Annalar, 1951, vol. 135, p. 449.Google Scholar
14. Wever, F., and Koch, W., Archiv für das Eisenhüttenwesen 1950, vol, 21, p. 143.Google Scholar
15. Crafts, W. and Lament, J. L., Trans. A.I.M.E., 1949, vol. 188. p. 957.Google Scholar
16. Kramer, H., Archiv für das Eisenhüttenwesen 1951, vol. 22, p. 53.Google Scholar
17. Balluffi, R. W., Cohen, M. and Averbach, B. L., Trans, A.S.M., 1951, vol. 43, p. 497.Google Scholar
18. Krainer, H., Archiv für das Eisenhüttenwesen, 1950, vol. 21, p. 33.Google Scholar
19. Jack, K. H., Jnl. Iron and Steel Inst., 1951, vol. 169, p. 26.Google Scholar
20. Gimmill, M. G., Hughes, H., Murray, J. D., Picketing, F. B. and Andrews, K. W., Jnl. Iron and Steel Inst., 1956, vol. 184 p. 122.Google Scholar
21. Liamer, R. E., Pryce, L. and Andrews, K. W., Jnl, Iron and Steel Inst., 1952, vol. 171, p. 49.Google Scholar
22. Pryce, L., Hughes, H., and Andrews, K. W., Jnl. Iron and Steel Inst., 1956, vol. 184, p. 289.Google Scholar