Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T21:40:48.828Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Effect of Valence and Coordination on K Series Diagram and Nondiagram Lines of Magnesium, Aluminum, and Silicon*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

William L. Baun
Affiliation:
Air Force Systems Command Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio
David W. Fischer
Affiliation:
Air Force Systems Command Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio
Get access

Abstract

Wavelengths and intensities are reported for the K series of magnesium, aluminum, and silicon, using primary excitation. Included in the tabulation for magnesium and aluminum are the diagram lines α1α2 and β and the nondiagram lines α', α3, α4, α5, and α6. Data are given for the Si K spectral lines α1α2, β, α3, and α4, Spectra are shown and line positions and intensities are detailed using both metal and oxide as the X-ray source. Significant differences are seen between metal and oxide spectra especially in wavelength and shape of Kβ, and large changes are noted in the intensities of some satellite lines. Spectra from a number of aluminum intermetallic compounds are discussed, including line positions, satellite line ratios, and line shape. It is shown that the spectra fall into three predictable groups; good conductors; poorer conductors; and semiconductors and insulators. Structurally similar compounds give similar spectra. For instance, line positions, shapes, and intensities are nearly identical for NbAl3 and TaAl3. It is not possible to correlate spectra with aluminum coordination number, and previous work using Kα, where secondary excitation was used, could not be reproduced using primary excitation. Possible reasons for this disagreement are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1964

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

All rights reserved by the U.S. Air Force, Air Force Materials Laboratory.

References

1. Furnas, T. C. and White, E. W., A Program of Basic Research to Study X-Ray Spectra in the Region 15-50 Å, WADD TR 61-168, May 1961.Google Scholar
2. Candlin, D. J., “On the Identification of X-Ray Satellites,” Proc. Phys. Soc. A68: 322, 1955.Google Scholar
3. Nordfors, B., “On the K Spectrum of Aluminum and Its Oxide,” Arkiv Fysik 10-.279-289, 1956.Google Scholar
4. O'Bryan, H. M. and Skinner, H. W. B., “The Soft X-Ray Spectroscopy of Solids. II. Emission Spectra from Simple Chemical Compounds,” Proc. Roy Soc. (London), Ser. A. 176: 229262, 1940.Google Scholar
5. Sandström, A.E., Encyclopedia of Physics, Vol.XXX, X-Rays, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1957, p. 197.Google Scholar
6. Wettcrblad, T., “The Spark Lines of the K Spectrum of Sodium, Magnesium and Aluminum,” Z. Physik 42:611–513, 1927.Google Scholar
7. Deodahr, G. B., “Some Investigations in Rontgen Spectra. I. X-Ray Spark Lines,” Proc Roy Soc. (London), Ser. A 131:633647, 1931.Google Scholar
8. Blokhin, M. A., The Physics of X-Rays, State Publishing House of Technical-Theoretical Literature, Moscow, 1957, Chapter 8.Google Scholar
9. Day, D. E., “Determining the Coordination Number of Aluminum Ions by X-Ray Emission Spectroscopy,” Nature 200:649651, 1963.Google Scholar
10. Brindley, G. W. and McKinstry, H. A., “The Kaolinite-Mullite Reaction Series. IV. Coordination of Aluminum,” J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 44:506507, 1961.Google Scholar
11. White, E. W., The Pennsylvania State University, private communication.Google Scholar