Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T16:05:27.884Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Crystallite Orientation Analysis for Rolled Cubic Materials

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

Peter R. Morris  and
Alan J. Heckler
Peter R. Morris
Affiliation:
Research and Technology Armco Steel Corporation Middletown, Ohio
Alan J. Heckler
Affiliation:
Research and Technology Armco Steel Corporation Middletown, Ohio
Get access

Abstract

Roe's method for deriving the crystallite orientation distribution in a series of generalized spherical harmonics is applied to the analysis of texture in rolled cubic materials. The augmented Jacobi polynomials, which are the basis of the generalized spherical harmonics, have been derived for cubic crystallographic symmetry and orthotopic physical symmetry through the sixteenth order. Truncation of the series expansions at the sixteenth order should permit treatment of textures having a maximum of 17 times random and a minimum angular width at half maximum of 34°. A numerical technique has been developed which permits approximate evaluation of the integral equations from a finite array of data points. The method is illustrated for commercial steels and is used to elucidate the primary recrystalization texture of a decarburized Fe-3%Si alloy.

Type
Research Article
Information
Advances in X-Ray Analysis , Volume 11: Sixteenth Annual Conference on Applications of X-ray Analysis, August 9-11, 1967 , 1967 , pp. 454 - 472
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1967

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Dunn, C. G., “On the Determination of Preferred Orientations,” J. Appl. Phys. 30: 850–857, 1959.Google Scholar
2. Roe, Ryong-Joon, “Description of Crystallite Orientation in Polycrystalline Materials. III. General Solution to Pole Figure Inversion,” J”. Appl. Phys. 36: 2024–2031, 1965.Google Scholar
3. Roe, Ryong-Joon, “Inversion of Pole Figures for Materials Having Cubic Crystal Symmetrv,” J. Appl. Phys. 31: 2069–2072, 1966.Google Scholar
4. Lopata, Stanley L. and Kula, Eric B., “A Reflection Method for Pole-Figure Determination,” Tram. A1ME 224: 865–866, 1962.Google Scholar
5. Meieran, Eugene S., “Use of the Reciprocal Lattice for the Development of a New Pole Figure Technique,” flea. Set. Instr. 33: 319–322, 1962.Google Scholar
6. Schulz, L. G., “A Direct Method of Determining Preferred Orientation of a Flat Reflection Sample Using a Geiger Counter X-Ray Spectrometer,” J. Appl. Phys. 20: 1030–1033, 1949.Google Scholar
7. Feng, C., “Determination of Relative Intensity in X-Ray Reflection Study,” J. Appl. Phys. 36: 3432–3435, 1965.Google Scholar
8. Heckler, A. J., Elias, J. A., and Woods, A. P., “Automatic Computer Plotting of Pole Figures and Axis Density Figures,” Trans. AIME 239: 1241–1244, 1967.Google Scholar
9. Decker, B. F., Asp, E. T., and Harker, D., “Preferred Orientation Determination Using a Geiger Counter X-Ray Diffraction Goniometer,” J. Appl. Phys. 19: 388–392, 1948.Google Scholar
10. Field, Michael and Merchant, M. Eugene, “Reflection Method of Determining Preferred Orientation on the Geiger-Counter Spectrometer,” J. Appl. Phys. 20: 741–745, 1949.Google Scholar
11. Dunn, C. G., Cold Working of Metals, ASM, Cleveland, 1949, p. 123.Google Scholar
12. May, John E. and Turnbull, David, “Secondary Recrystallization in Silicon Iron,” Trans. AIME 212: 769–781,1958.Google Scholar
13. Dunn, C. G. and Walter, J. L., Recrystallization, Grain Growth and Textures, ASM, Metals Park, Ohio, 1966, p. 509.Google Scholar