Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T15:46:14.910Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Controlled-Humidity XRD Analyses: Application to the Study of Smectite Expansion/Contraction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

Steve J. Chipera ,
J. William Carey  and
David. L. Bish
Steve J. Chipera
Affiliation:
Earth and Environmental Sciences Division Los Alamos National Laboratory Mail Stop D469, Los Alamos, NM 87545
J. William Carey
Affiliation:
Earth and Environmental Sciences Division Los Alamos National Laboratory Mail Stop D469, Los Alamos, NM 87545
David. L. Bish
Affiliation:
Earth and Environmental Sciences Division Los Alamos National Laboratory Mail Stop D469, Los Alamos, NM 87545
Get access

Abstract

Smectites are clay minerals that expand and contract dramatically in response to changes in water vapor pressure. The expansion/contraction behavior of smectite has considerable importance in engineering applications (such as the stability of building foundations and the integrity of clay barriers) and affects hydrologic properties. To understand this behavior we have analyzed several purified, homoionic smectite standards over a wide range of relative humidities using X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) and a new computer-automated humidity-control system.

Humidity was controlled by mixing dry N2 with H2O-saturated (“wet”) N2 produced with a gas-washing bubbler held in a constant-temperature bath set at 35°C. Mixing of wet and dry N2 was controlled with automated MKS mass-flow controllers.

Type
Research Article
Information
Advances in X-Ray Analysis , Volume 39: Forty-Fourth Annual Conference on Applications of X-ray Analysis, July 31 - August 4, 1995 , 1995 , pp. 713 - 722
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chipera, S. J., Guthrie, G. D., Jr., and Bish, D. L., (1993) Preparation and purification of mineral dusts. In Health Effects of Mineral Dusts, Guthrie, G. D. and Mossman, B. T., eds., Reviews in Mineralogy 28, Mineralogical Society of America, Washington D.C., 235-249.Google Scholar
Bish, D. L. (1988) Smectite dehydration and stability: Applications to radioactive waste isolation at Yucca Mountain, Nevada. Los Alamos “National Laboratory report, LA-11023-MS, 31 p.Google Scholar
Gillery, F. H. (1959) Adsorption-desorption characteristics of synthetic montmorillonoids in humid atmospheres. Amer. Mineral. 44, 806-818.Google Scholar
Hardy, B. (1992) Two-pressure humidity calibration on the factory floor. Sensors, July, 1992, 15-19.Google Scholar
Keren, R. and Shainberg, I. (1975) Water vapor isotherms and heat of immersion of Na/Ca-montmorillonite systems-I: Homoiomc clay. Clays & Clay Minerals 23, 193-200.Google Scholar
Kühnel, R. A. and van der Gaast, S. J. (1993) Humidity controlled diffractometry and its applications. In Advances in X-Ray Analysis 36, Gilfrich, J. V. et al, eds., Plenum Press, New York, 439–449.Google Scholar
Mooney, R. W., Keenan, A. G., and Wood, L. A. (1952a) Adsorption of water vapor by montmorillonite. I. Heat of desorption and application of BET theory. J. Amer, Chem. Soc. 74, 1367–1371.Google Scholar
Mooney, R. W., Keenan, A. G., and Wood, L. A. (1952b) Adsorption of water vapor by montmorillonite, II. Effect of exchangeable ions and lattice swelling as measured by X-ray diffraction. J. Amer. Chem. Soc. 74, 1371–1374.Google Scholar
Newman, A. C. |D. (1987) The interaction of water with clay mineral surfaces. In Chemistry of Clays and Clay Minerals, Mineralogical Society Monograph No. 6, Newman, A. C. D., Ed., Longman Scientific & Technical, England, 237–274.Google Scholar
Ormerod, E. C. and Newman, D. A. C., (1983) Water sorption on Ca-saturated clays: II: Internal and external surfaces of montmorillonite. Clay Minerals 18, 289-299.Google Scholar