Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T05:40:37.617Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Comparison of X-Ray Diffraction Residual Stress Measurement Methods on Machined Surfaces

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

Paul. S. Prevey
Paul. S. Prevey*
Affiliation:
Metcut Research Associates Inc. Cincinnati, OH 45209
Get access

Abstract

The two-angle and Sin2ψ methods of x-ray diffraction, residual stress measurement have been shown to yield anomalous results When applied to samples which have been plastically deformed uniaxially in tension or by rolling. These anomalous stresses, which are not true mechanical macrostresses, have been shown to arise from a nonlinear dependence,of d, the interplanar spacing employed for stress measurement, upon Sin2 ψ. A new method of x-ray diffraction stress measurement has been developed by Marion and Cohen which aLlows the separation of the Linear and nonlinear components of the dependence of d upon Sin2 ψ.

The two-angle and the Marion-Cohen x-ray diffraction methods are applied to the measurement of residual stresses in the machined and shot peened surfaces of steel and aluminum samples. The results indicate that machining deformation results in a nearly linear dependence of d upon Sin2ψ , and onLy a slight deformation texture. The two x-ray methods yield stress values in ground, turned, and shot peened steel and aluminum samples which agree within the estimated experimental error. Previous results are sighted showing agreement between the two-angle method and a mechanical stress measurement technique. The results indicate that, at least in steels, the multiaxial plastic deformation produced by machining does not significantly effect the accuracy of the two-angle x-ray diffraction stress mea surement method.

Type
X-Ray Diffraction Applications
Information
Advances in X-Ray Analysis , Volume 19: Twenty-Fourth Annual Conference on Applications of X-ray Analysis, August 6-8, 1975 , 1975 , pp. 709 - 724
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Ricklefs, R. E. and Evans, W. P., “Anomalous Residual Stresses”, Advances in X-Ray Analysis, Vol. 10, 1967, pp. 273–283.Google Scholar
2. Marion, R. H. and Cohen, J. B., “Anomalies in the Measurement of Residual Stress by X-Ray Diffraction”, Advances in X -Ray Analysis, Vol. 18, 1975, pp. 466–501.Google Scholar
3. Shiraiwo, T. and Sakamoto, Y., “X-Ray Stress Measurement of Deformed Steels”, Proceedings of the Seminar on X-Ray Study of Strength and Deformation of Metals, Tokyo: Society of Materials Science, Japan, 1971, pp. 15-22.Google Scholar
4. Taira, S., “X-Ray Approach for the Study on Mechanical Behavior of Metals,” Mechanical Behavior of Metals , The Society of Materials Science, Japan, 1972, pp. 111-128.Google Scholar
5. Cullity, B. D., “Residual Stress After Plastic Elongation and Magnetic Losses in Silicon Steel”, Transactions of the Metallurgical Society of AIME, Vol. 227, 1963, pp. 356–358.Google Scholar
6. Cullity, B. D., “Sources of Errors in X-Ray Measurements of Residual Stress”, Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 35, 1964, pp. 1915–1917.Google Scholar
7. X-Ray Division of the SAE Fatigue Design and Evaluation Committee, Residual Stress Measurement by X-Ray Diffraction, SAE J784a, Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc., NY, 1971.Google Scholar
8. Residual Stress Measurement by X-Ray Diffraction, p. 61.Google Scholar
9. Residual Stress Measurement by X-Ray Diffraction, pp. 63-64.Google Scholar
10. Field, M. and Merchant, M. E., “Reflection Method of Determining Preferred Orientation on the Geiger -Counter Spectrometer”, Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 20, 1949, pp, 741–745.Google Scholar
11. Marion, R. H., “X-Ray Stress Analysis of Plastically Deformed Metals”, Doctoral Dissertation, Northwestern University, 1973.Google Scholar
12. Prevey, P. S., “Anomalous Residual Stresses in Surface Ground 4340 Steel, “ Minutes of the Meeting of the X-Ray Fatigue Division of the SAE Fatigue Design and Evaluation Committee, September 26, 1973.Google Scholar
13. Koistinen, D. P. and Marburger, R. E., “A Simplified Procedure for Calculating Peak Position in X-Ray Residual Stress Measurements on. Hardened Steel,” ASM Transactions, Vol. 51, 1959, pp. 546.Google Scholar