Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T05:39:57.975Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Calibration of an Energy Dispersive X-Ray Fluorescence Spectrometer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

A. R. Stiles
Affiliation:
Northrop Services, Inc. ERC, Research Triangle Park, N. C. 27711
T. G. Dzubay
Affiliation:
Environmental Protection Agency, ERC, Research Triangle Park, N. C. 27711
R. M. Baum
Affiliation:
Chemistry Duke University, Durham, N. C. 27705
R. L. Walter
Affiliation:
Physics Dept., Duke University, Durham, N. C. 27705
R. D. Willis
Affiliation:
Physics Dept., Duke University, Durham, N. C. 27705
L. J. Moore
Affiliation:
U. S. Dept, of Commerce, National Bureau of Standards, Washington, D. C. 20234
E. L. Garner
Affiliation:
U. S. Dept, of Commerce, National Bureau of Standards, Washington, D. C. 20234
J. W. Gramlich
Affiliation:
U. S. Dept, of Commerce, National Bureau of Standards, Washington, D. C. 20234
L. A. Machlan
Affiliation:
U. S. Dept, of Commerce, National Bureau of Standards, Washington, D. C. 20234
Get access

Abstract

The purpose of this work was to develop accurate calibration standards which were fully characterized in terms of uniformity and concentration using fundamental measuring methods. Three similar sets of vacuum deposits were commercially made, each set containing the single deposits CuS, KCl, CaF2, Cr, Fe, Cu, RbNO3, SrF2, MoO3 , BaF2, and Pb. Thickness variations in each deposit were measured with PIXEA (proton induced x-ray excitation analysis) measurements taken at 6 to 8 positions along the deposit diameters. Relative elemental concentrations on corresponding deposits from each set were measured using multiple XRF intercomparisons. One set of deposits was destructively analyzed at the National Bureau of Standards with isotope dilution thermal ionization mass spectrometry (IDMS) in order to calibrate the remaining sets of vacuum deposits. The calibrated deposits were compared with standards from two commercial sources. For seven elements heavier than chlorine there was an average deviation of 13.5% between the calibrated deposits and the commercial standards. Disagreements as large as 15% were observed between standards from the two commercial suppliers.

Type
X-Ray Spectrometry in Environmental Analysis
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Goulding, F. S. and Jaklevic, J., “X-Ray Fluorescence Spectrometer for Airborne Particulate Monitoring,” EPA Report No. EPA-R2-73-182(1973).Google Scholar
2. Dzubay, T. G. and Stevens, R. K., “Ambient Air Analysis with Dichotomous Sampler and X-Ray Fluorescence Spectrometer,” Envir. Sci. and Tech., 9, 663668 (1975).Google Scholar
3. Giaque, R. D., Goulding, F. S., Jaklevic, J. M. and Pehl, R. H., “Trace Element Determinations with Semiconductor Detector X-Ray Spectrometers ,” Anal. Chem.,45, 671681 (1973).Google Scholar
4. Barnes, I. L., “Determination of Lead, Uranium, Thorium and Thallium in Silicate Glass Standard Materials by Isotope Dilution Mass Spectrometry,” Anal. Chem., 45, 880885 (1973).Google Scholar
5. Moore, L. J., Machlan, L. A., “High Accuracy Determination of Calcium in Blood Serum by Isotope Dilution Mass Spectrometry,” Anal. Chem., 44, 2291-2296 (1972).Google Scholar
6. Moore, L. J., Machlan, L. A., Shields, W. R. and Garner, E. L., “Internal Normalization Techniques for High Accuracy Isotope Dilution Analyses — Application to Molybdenum and Nickel in Standard Reference Materials,” Anal. Chem., 46, 1082-1089 (1974).Google Scholar
7. NBS Technical Note #277, “Analytical Mass Spectrometry Section: Instrumentation and Procedures for Isotopic Analysis,” edited by Shields, W. R. (1966). Available from Supt. of Documents, U. S. Gov't Printing Office, Washington, D. C. 20402.Google Scholar
8. Baum, R. M., Gutknecht, W. F., Willis, R. D., and Walter, R. L. , “Preparation of Standard Targets for X-Ray Analysis,” Anal. Chem. 47, 1727-1728 (1975); see also Anal. Chem., 46, 843-85S (1974).Google Scholar
9. Baum, R. M., Gutknecht, W. F., Walter, R. L. and Stiles, A. R., “Standard Solution Deposits using a Capillary Matrix and Lyophilization,” to be presented at Symposium and Workshop on X-Ray Fluorescence Analysis of Environmental Samples, Environmental Sciences Research Laboratory, EPA, Research Triangle Park, N.C., January 26-28, 1976.Google Scholar
10. Camp, D. C., VanLehn, A. L., Rhodes, J. R., and Pradzynski, A. H., “Intercomparison of Trace Element Determinations in Simulated and Real Air Particulate Samples,” X-Ray Spectrometry, 4, 123137 (1975).Google Scholar