No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Background Intensities and Their Utilization in Quantitative Analysis by Monochromatically Excited Energy-Dispersive X-Ray Fluorescence
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 March 2019
Abstract
In monochromatically excited energy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence spectrometry, the spectral background has mainly been investigated for a better understanding of its origin and nature, or with the aim to reduce its magnitude for an improvement of detection limits.
The observation that the background intensity can largely be ascribed to a residual polychromatic fraction of the exciting radiation has led to the derivation of an empirical relationship between the scattering characteristics of a sample and the observed background intensity. This dependence constitutes the basis of a matrix correction procedure useful for samples with a considerable fraction of light elements.
Two algorithmic variations are presented: one that relies on the definition of a single matrix element, and a second one that can be used in conjunction with the measurement of the incoherently scattered exciting radiation. These options are useful if direct quantification of either or both scatter peaks is not feasible.
Results are presented for a variety of Standard Reference Materials.
- Type
- III. XRF Fundamental Parameters and Data Analysis
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1986
References
Ellis, A.T., Leyden, D.E., Wegscheider, W., Jablonski, B.B., and Bodnar, W.B., 1982, Preconcentration Methods for the Determination of Trace Elements in Water Using X-Ray Fluorescence Spectrometry I. Response Characteristics, final. Chim. flcta 142:73.Google Scholar
Giauque, R.D., Garrett, R.B., and Goda, L.Y., 1979, Determination of Trace Elements in Light Element Matrices by X-ray Fluorescence Spectrometry with Incoherent Scattered Radiation as an Internal Standard, final. Chem. 51:511.Google Scholar
Giauque, R.D., Goulding, F.S., Jaklevic, J.M., and Pehl, R. L.
1973, Trace Element Determination with Semiconductor Detector X-ray SpBctrouieters, final - Chem. 45:671.Google Scholar
Goulding, F.S. and Jaklevic, J.M., 1977, XRF. Analysis - Some Sensitivity Comparisons Between Charged-Particle and Photon Excitation, Nuel. Instr Meth. 142:323.Google Scholar
McMasters, W.H., Del Grande, N.K., Mallett, J.H., and Hubbell, J.H., 1969, Compilation of X-ray Cross Sections, Univ. of California, Report UCRL-50174, Sec, II. Rev. 1.Google Scholar
Nielson, K.K., 1979, Progress in X-ray Fluorescence Correction Methods Using Scattered Radiation, Adv. X-Ray final. 22:303.Google Scholar
Rachetti, A. and Wegscheider, W., in press, A Fundamental Parameters Approach Incorporating Scattered Radiation for Monoenergetically Excited Samples in Energy-Dispersive X-Ray fluorescence Spectrometry, Anal. Chim. Acta xxx:yyy.Google Scholar
Raptis, S.E., Wegscheider, W., Knapp, G., and Tölg, G., 1980, X-Ray Fluorescence Determination of Trace Selenium in Organic and Biological Matrices, Anal. Chem. 52:1292.Google Scholar
Standzenieks, P. and Selin, E., 1979, Background Reduction of X-ray Fluorescence Spectra in a Secondary Target Energy Dispersive Spectrometer Nucl. Instr. Meth. 165:63.Google Scholar
Van Espen, P. and Adams, F., 1976, Evaluation of a Practical Background Calculation Method in X-ray Energy Analysis, X-Ray Spectrom. 5:123.Google Scholar
Wielopolski, L. and Gardner, R.P., 1979, Development of the Detector Response Function Approach in the Least-Squares Analysis of X-ray Fluorescence Spectra, Nucl. Instr. Meth. 165:297.Google Scholar