Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T19:11:26.487Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Application of Computers in Electron Probe and X-Ray Fluorescence Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

Stanley D. Rasberry
Stanley D. Rasberry*
Affiliation:
Institute for Materials Research National Bureau of Standards Washington, D. C. 20231
Get access

Abstract

This paper is a review of automation of electron microprobe and x-ray fluorescence instrumentation. Such a review seems timely because of the great increase in the application of computer systems in this field over the past decade. Some of these applications have been conceived to meet true technological needs while in other cases they have “been undertaken to “keep up with the Joneses.” I would like to show not only what automated systems are now feasible but also when and how they should he employed. The “when” and “how” of automation are largely dependent upon the application being considered; in this study, x-ray applications have been divided into the following classes;

  • (1) on-stream process-control,

  • (2) off-line quality assurance,

  • (3) routine service laboratory,

  • (4) general purpose analytical laboratory.

Several phases are present in these classes, including: specimen preparation and loading, measurement, data acquisition and transfer, data processing and display, and finally, archival data storage. Various workers have undertaken the automation of all these operations in one or the other of the classes of applications; from a review of their work and by examining details of each operation within the framework of a given application, we can now draw conclusions on the extent of desirable automation.

Type
Research Article
Information
Advances in X-Ray Analysis , Volume 15: Twentieth Annual Conference on Applications of X-ray Analysis, August 11-13, 1971 , 1971 , pp. 56 - 69
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. MeCune, R. A., Mueller, W. M. and Dunton, P. J., “Feasibility of the X-Ray Spectrograph as a Continuous Analytical Instrument for Process Control,” in Mueller, W. M. (ed.) Advances in X-Ray Analysis, Vol. 1, Plenum Press, New York, 1960, p. 399.Google Scholar
2. Campbell, W. J., “Apparatus for Continuous Fluorescent X-Ray Spectro graphic Analysis of Solutions,” Applied Spectroscopy 14, 26 (1960).Google Scholar
3. Davis, C. M. and Yanak, M. M., “Performance of an Unattended Automated X-Ray Spectrograph,” in: Mueller, W. M., Mallett, G. and Fay, M. (eds.), Advances in X-Ray Analysis, Vol. 7, Plenum Press, New York, 1964, pp. 644–652.Google Scholar
4. Moffat, W. G. and Carson, R., “Some Instrumental Considerations in the Automatic On-Stream Analysis of Pulps for Elemental Content,” in: Mueller, W. M., Mallett, G. and Fay, M. (eds.), Advances in X-Ray Analysis, Vol. 8, Plenum Press, New York, 1965, pp. 204–214.Google Scholar
5. Davidson, E., Gilkerson, A. W. and Shequen, W. G., “X-Ray Fluorescence Analysis with a Hew High Speed Multichannel Instrument,” Pittsburgh Conference on Analytical Chemistry and Applied Spectroscopy, March 1965.Google Scholar
6. J, K. F.. Heinrich, “Electron Probe Microanalysis: A Review,” Applied Spectroscopy 22, 395 (1968).Google Scholar
7. Campbell, W. J. and Brown, J. D., “X-Ray Absorption and Emission,” Anal.Chem. 40, 346R (1968).Google Scholar
8. Campbell, W. J. and Gilfrich, J. V., “X-Ray Absorption and Emission,” Anal. Chem. 42, 248R (1970).Google Scholar
9. Deichert, R. W. and O'Connor, J. P., “A Review of Process Control Instrumentation Development,” Store! co Reporter 10, 43 (1968).Google Scholar
10. Liebhafslty, H. A., Pfeiffer, H. G., Winslow, E. H. and Zemany, P. D., X-Ray Absorption and EmisaionIn Analytical Chemistry, ﹛John Wiley and Sons, inc., 1960﹜, pp. 69–71.Google Scholar
11. Fowler, W. E., Breckheimer, P. J. and Hartwick, A. J., “The Impact of Digital Computers on Spectrochemical Analysis,” Pittsburgh Conference on Analytical Chemistry and Applied Spectroscopy, March 1965.Google Scholar
12. Bayard, M., “Computer Interfacing the Electron Microprobe,” The Microscope 17, 169 (1969).Google Scholar
13. Kunz, F., Eichen, E., Matthews, G. and Piner, S., “Electron Microprobe Automation,” Proceedings Sixth National Conference on Electron Probe Analysis (1971). Copies available from L. Vassamillet, Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pa, 15213.Google Scholar
14. Chodos, A. A. and Albee, A. L., “Quantitative Microprobe Analysis and Data Reduction Using an On-Line Mini Computer,” Proceedings Sixth National Conference on Electron Probe Analysis (1971). See 13Google Scholar
15. Frazer, J. W., “Digital Control Computers In Analytical Chemistry,” Anal. Chem. 40, 26A (1968).Google Scholar
16. Rasberry, S. D., “X-Ray Spectrometry,” in Scribner, B. F. (ed.), Activities of the NBSSpectrochemical Analysis Section, July 1967 to June 1968, U.S. National Bureau of Standards Technical Note 452, U.S. Government Printing Office (Sept, 1968), pp. 38–44.Google Scholar
17. Pedersen, E., “A Modular Approach to Laboratory Instrument Automation American Laboratory, February 1970 Issue.Google Scholar
18. Baun, W. L. and White, E. W., A Vacuum Spectrometer for Studying the chemical Effect of Soft X-ray Spectra,” in: Henke, B. L., Newkirk, J. B. and Mallett, G. R. (eds.), Advances in X-Ray Analysis, Vol. 13, Plenum Press, New York, 1970, pp. 237–247.Google Scholar
19. Steele, W. J., “LRL Computer Program: Microanalysis,” Proceedings Sixth National Conference on Electron Probe Analysis (1971). See 13.Google Scholar
20. Kirkendall, T. D. and Varadi, P. F., “An Automated Microprobe Under PDP-8 Control Using an IBM 360/65 for Program and Data Storage,” Proceedings Sixth National Conference on Electron Probe Analysis (1971). See 13.Google Scholar
21. Heinrich, K. F. J., Myklebust, R. L., Rasberry, S. D. and Michaelis, R. E., “Appendix 4 - Automated Techniques for Homogeneity Analysis,” in: Preparation and Evaluation of SRM's 481 and 482 Gold-Silver and Gold-Copper Alloys for Microanalysis, U.S. National Bureau of Standards Special Publication 260-28, U.S. Government Printing Office (August 1971), PP. 70–89.Google Scholar
22. Yakovits, H., Fiori, C. E. and Michaelis, R. E., “Homogeneity Characterization of Fe-3Si Alloy,” U.S. National Bureau of Standards Special Publication 260-22, U.S Government Printing Office (February 1971).Google Scholar
23. McMillan, R. E., Johnson, G. G. Jr. and White, E. W., “Computer Processing of Binary Maps of SEM Images,” The Proceedings of the Second Annual Scanning Electron Microscope Symposium, IIT Research Institute, Chicago, Ill. 606l6 (1969).Google Scholar
24. Matson, W. L., McKinstry, H. A., Johnson, G. G. Jr., White, E. W. and McMillan, R. E., “Computer Processing of SEM Images by Contour Analyses,” Pattern Recognition 2, 303 (1970).Google Scholar
25. White, E. W., Görz, H., Johnson, G. G. Jr.:and McMillan, R. E., “Particle Size Distributions of Particulate Aluminas from Computer-Processed SEM Images,” The Proceedings of the Third Annual Scanning Electron Microscope Symposium, IIT Research Institute, Chicago, Ill. 60616(1970).Google Scholar
26. Yakowitz, H. and Heinrich, K. F. J., “Inclusion Identification by Means of Electron Probe Microanalysis,” Metallography 1, 55 (1968).Google Scholar
27. Colby, J. W., “Magic IV - A New Improved Version of Magic,” Proceedings Sixth National Conference on Electron Probe Analysis (1971). See 13.Google Scholar
28. Rasberry, S. D., Margoshesa, M. and Scribner, B. F., “Applications of a Time Sharing Computer in a Spectrochemistry Laboratory: Optical Emiaaion and X-ray Fluorescence,” U.S. Natl, Bur. Stds. Tech, Note 407, U.S. Govt, Printing Office (Feb. 1968).Google Scholar
29. Kirkendall, T. D. and Varadi, P. F., Communications Satellite Corporation, private communication.Google Scholar
30. Beaman, D. R. and Isasi, J. A., “Electron Beam Microanalysis - Part I,” Materials Research and Standards 11, No. 11, 8 (1971).Google Scholar
31. Beaman, D. R. and Isasi, J. A., “Electron Beam Microanalysis - Part II,” Materials Research and Standards 11, No. 12, 12 (1971).Google Scholar
32. J, K. F.. Heinrich (ed.), Quantitative Electron Probe Microanalysis, U.S. National Bureau of Standards Special Publication 298, U.S. Government Printing Office (October 1968).Google Scholar
33. Beaman, D. R. and Isasi, J. A., “A Critical Examination of Computer Programs Used in Quantitative Electron Microprobe Analysis,” Anal.Chem. 42, 1540(1970).Google Scholar
34. Criss, J. W. and Birks, L. S., “Calculation Methods for Fluorescent X-Ray Spectrometry - Empirical Coefficients vs. Fundamental Parameters,” Anal. Chem. 40, 1080 (1968).Google Scholar
35. Rhodes, J. R., Hunter, C. B., Kellogg, D. L., Sieberg, R. D. and Furuta, T., “Applications of Computer-coupled Radioisotope X-Ray Spectrometer to Analysis of Steels,” in; Barrett, C. S., Newkirk, J. B. and Ruud, C. O. (eds.), Advances in X-Ray Analysis, Vol. 14, Plenum Press, New York, 1971, pp. 127–138.Google Scholar
36. Short, J. M. and Stephany, J. F., “Storage and Treatment of Energy-Dispersive X-ray Data by Time-Shared Computer,” Proceedings Sixth Natl. Conf. on Electron Probe Analysis (1971). See 13.Google Scholar
37. Lifshin, E., “Computer Processing of Solid State X-ray Detector Data,” Proceedings Fifth National Conference on Electron Probe Analysis (1970). Copies available from D. Beaman, Dow Chemical Co., Midland, Mich, 48640.Google Scholar
38. DeVoe, J. R., Rasberry, S. D., Ruegg, F. C. and Shideler, R. W., “Computer Assisted Measurement in Spectroscopy,” Tenth National SAS Meeting, October 1971.Google Scholar
39. J. Arranson of the Computer Services Division of the National Bureau of Standards is the author of the program DACQ.Google Scholar
40. Kennicott, P. R., Scavullo, V. P., Sicko, J. S. and Lifshin, E., “Laboratory Automation at General Electric Corporate Research and Development,” AFIPS Conf. Proc. 39, 423 (1971).Google Scholar