Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T02:01:18.711Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Analysis of the Broadening of Powder Pattern Peaks from Cold-Worked Face-Centered and Body-Centered Cubic Metals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

C. N. J. Wagner  and
E. N. Aqua
C. N. J. Wagner
Affiliation:
Yale University New Haven, Connecticut
E. N. Aqua
Affiliation:
Yale University New Haven, Connecticut
Get access

Abstract

The broadening of powder pattern peaks of metals is normally caused by small crystallite size and by distortions within the crystallites as a consequence of dislocation configurations. In addition, the experimental diffraction geometry contributes to the line broadening. Using Cu Kα radiation, we recorded the peak profiles of the cold-worked and annealed filings of tungsten, niobium, aluminum, and silver-indium alloys with a standard focusing diffractometer. The Rachinger method was applied to separate the Kα1 and Kα2 peaks, and the Kα1 peaks were subjected to a Fourier analysis. Elimination of the instrumental broadening was carried out by the Stokes method, which does not require any assumptions concerning the mathematical description of the diffraction peak profile.

The Fourier coefficients, AL, were separated into the fraction produced by particle size, ALFF, and by strains, ALe, by the Warren-Averbach method and plotted as a function of the distance L = ndhkl, normal to the reflecting planes (hkl) of spacing dhkl. The negative, reciprocal initial slope of the ALPF vs. L curve is equal to the effective particle size Deff, which contains the effects of the true crystallite size and faulting. The coefficients ALβ = AL/ALPF are used to calculate the root mean square strain <∊L2>1/2. The sum of the ALPF, which is proportional to a reciprocal integral breadth, leads to a different particle size, DWAPF, which is also dependent upon the crystallite size and faulting. The sum of the AL6 values is a measure of the strain ƐWA.

The integral breadths bst, corrected by the Stokes method, i.e.,

are separated into a particle size term bstPF and distortion term bSts using the relations . It is found that only the first relation leads to particle sizes DG,StPF and strains ∊G,st similar to those obtained by the summation of the ALPF and AL6, i.e., DWAPF and ∊wA, respectively. The integral breadths of the cold-worked peaks Bew and of the annealed standards bA. were also calculated, using the Lauc definition of B equal to area per peak maximum. A comparison of the values of bst/Bcw with bA/Bew for bA/Bew < 0.6 shows that all data follow the parabolic relation b/Bew = 1 − bA2/Bew2. The maximum deviation of bst/Bew from the parabola is less than 10%.

Type
Research Article
Information
Advances in X-Ray Analysis , Volume 7: Twelfth Annual Conference on Applications of X-ray Analysis, August 7-9, 1963 , 1963 , pp. 46 - 65
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1963

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Warren, B. E., Progress in Metal Physics, Vol. 8, Pergamon Press, New York, 1958, p. 147.Google Scholar
2. Welch, D. O. and Otte, H. M., “The Effect of Cold-Work on the X-Ray Diffraction Pattern of a Copper-Silicon-Manganese Alloy,” Advances in X-Ray Analysis, Vol. 6, University of Denver, Plenum Press, New York, 1963, p. 96.Google Scholar
3. Kochendorfer, A., Z. Krist. 105: 393, 1944.Google Scholar
4. Klug, H. P. and Alexander, L. E., X-Ray Diffraction Procedures, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1954.Google Scholar
5. Jones, F. W., “Measurement of Particle Size by the X-Ray Method,” Froc. Roy. Soc. A166: 16, 1938.Google Scholar
6. Stokes, A. R., “A Numerical Fourier-Analysis Method for the Correction of Widths and Shapes of Lines on X-Ray Powder Photographs,” Proc. Phys. Soc, (London) B61: 382, 1948.Google Scholar
7. von Laue, M., “The Lorentz Factor and the Intensity Distribution in Debye-Scherrer Rings,” Z. Krist. 64: 115, 1926.Google Scholar
8. Wilson, A. J. C., “On Variance as a Measure of Line Broadening in Diffractometry, General Theory and Small Particle Size,” Proc. Phys. Soc. (London) 80: 286, 1962.Google Scholar
9. Warren, B. E. and Averbach, B. L., “The Effect of Cold-Work Distortion on X-Ray Patterns,” J. Appl. Phys. 21: 595, 1950; “The Separation of Cold-Work Distortion and Particle Size Broadening in X-Ray Patterns,” J. Appl. Phys. 23: 497, 1952.Google Scholar
10. Bertaut, E. F., “Debye-Scherrer Lines and Distribution of Bragg Domain Dimensions in Polycrystalline Powders,” Acta Cryst. 3: 14, 1950.Google Scholar
11. Wagner, C. N. J., Tetelman, A. S., and Otte, H. M., “Diffraction from Layer Faults in B.C.C. and F.C.C. Structures,” J. Appl. Phys. 33: 3080, 1962.Google Scholar
12. Warren, B. E., Lecture notes, MIT, 8-28, 1955.Google Scholar
13. Scherrer, P., Kolloid chemie, third edition, Spamer, Leipzig, 1920, p. 387, “Estimation of the Size and Internal Structure of Colloidal Particles by Measured Rontgen Rays,” Nachr. Ges. Wiss. Go'ttingen 2: 96, 1918.Google Scholar
14. Hall, W. H.,J. Inst. Met. 75: 1127, 1949.Google Scholar
15. McKeehan, M., and Warren, B. E., “X-Ray Study of Cold Work in Thoriated Tungsten,” J. Appl. Phys. 24: 52, 1953.Google Scholar
16. Rachinger, W. A., “A Correction for the ai«s Doublet in the Measurement of Widths of X-Ray Diffraction Lines,“J. Sci. Instr. 25, 254, 1948.Google Scholar
17. Warren, B. E. and Biscoe, J., “The Structure of Silica Glass by X-Ray Diffraction Studies,” J. Am. Cerarn. Soc. 21: 49, 1938.Google Scholar
18. Beevers, C. A., “Fourier Strips at a 3° Interval,” Acta Cryst. 5: 670, 1952.Google Scholar
19. Guinier, A., Théorie et Technique de la Radiocrystallographie, Dunod, Paris, 1956, p. 682.Google Scholar
20. Aqua, E. N., “Computer Programs for the Analysis of Positions and Profiles of X-Ray Power Patterns,” ASM Report System No. 15.3, 1963.Google Scholar
21. Alexander, L. E. arid Klug, H. P., “Determination of Crystallite Size with the X-Ray Spectrometer,“ J. Appl. Phys. 21: 137, 1950.Google Scholar
22. Alexander, L. E., “The Synthesis of X-Ray Spectrometer Line Profiles and Application to Crystalline-Size Measurements,” J. Appl. Phys. 25: 155, 1954.Google Scholar
23. Anantharaman, T. R. and Christian, J. W., “The Measurement of Growth and Deformation Faulting in Hexagonal Cobalt,” Acta Cryst. 9: 479, 1956.Google Scholar
24. Schoening, F. R. L., van Niekerk, J. N., and Haul, R. A. W., “Influence of the Apparatus Function on Crystallite Size Determinations with Geiger Counter Spectrometer,” Proc. Phys. Soc. (London) B65: 528, 1952.Google Scholar
25. Taylor, A., X-Ray Metallography, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1961, p. 692.Google Scholar
26. Hauk, V. and Hummel, C., Z. Metallk. 47: 254, 1956.Google Scholar
27. Adler, R. P. I. and Wagner, C. N. J., “X-Ray Diffraction Study of the Effect of Solutes on the Occurrence of Stacking Faults in Silver-Base Alloys.“ J. Appl. Phys. 33: 3451, 1962.Google Scholar