Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T05:51:09.138Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Instrument for Soft X-Ray Selected-Area Microdiffraction*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

H. H. Pattee
H. H. Pattee*
Affiliation:
Stanford University Stanford, California
Get access

Abstract

An instrument for soft X-ray selected-area microd infraction has been constructed fulfilling the principles of optimum intensity for given specimen size and resolution, and permitting direct visual beam focusing and alignment for specimen sizes in the 1-10 μ region. The X-ray source is a modified, two-lens, microfocus tube manufactured by Canal Industrial Corporation supplemented by a camera, specimen stage, and incident-light microscope. Target-to-film distance may be adjusted from 50 μ to several millimeters which allows the use of wavelengths as long as Al K radiation in air. The use of soft radiation for microsamples simplifies the collimation requirements and permits shorter specimen-to-film distance for a given resolution. Collimating apertures are punched in foil with etched tungsten points or with the microfocus electron beam. Results confirm the prediction that microsamples do not require excessive exposure times using optimum geometry for source size and camera dimensions.

Type
Research Article
Information
Advances in X-Ray Analysis , Volume 8: Thirteenth Annual Conference on Applications of X-ray Analysis, August 12-14, 1964 , 1964 , pp. 215 - 222
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1964

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This work was performed under Office of Naval Research Contract Nonr 225(51).

References

1. Hirsch, P. B., “X-Ray Microbeam Techniques,” Chapter 11 in X-Ray Diffraction of Polycrystalline Materials, H, S. Peiser, H. P. Rooksby, and A. J. C. Wilson (eds.), Inst. of Phys., London, 1955, p. 278.Google Scholar
2. Stansneld, J. R., “An X-Ray Generator with a Wide Range of Focal Areas,” in X-Ray Microscopy and X-Ray Microanalysis, A. Bngstrom, V. E. Cosslett, and H. Pattee (eds,), Blsevier, Amsterdam, 1960, p. 483.Google Scholar
3. Nixon, W. C., “The Point Projection X-Ray Microscope as a Point Source for Microbeam X-Ray Diffraction,” in X-Ray Microscopy and Microradiography, V. E. Cosslett, A. Engström, and H. Pattee (eds.), Academic Press, New York, 1957, p. 336.Google Scholar
4. Carlstrom, D., “Micro X-Ray Diffraction on Biological Materials,” in Advances in Biological and Medical Physics, C. Tobias, J. H. Lawrence, and T. L. Hayes (eds.), Academic Press, New York, 1960, p. 77.Google Scholar
5. Cosslett, V. E. and Nixon, W. C., X-Ray Microscopy, Cambridge University Press, 1960, Chapter 14.Google Scholar
6. Huxley, H. E., “Optimum Geometric Conditions in the Design and Use of X-Ray Diffraction Tubes and Cameias,” Acta Cryst. 6: 457, 1953.Google Scholar
7. Kirkpatrkk, P. and Pattee, H. H., Advances in Biological and Medical Physics, Vol. Ill, Academic Press, 1953, New York, p. 247.Google Scholar
8. Franks, A., “Some Developments and Applications of Microfocus X-Ray Diffraction Techniques,” Brit. J. Appl. Phys. 9: 349, 1958.Google Scholar
9. Pattee, H. H., “An Apparatus for Soft X-Ray, Selected Area, Micro-diffract ion,” Paper 31, Symposium on X-Ray Optics and X-Ray Microanalysis, Stanford, 1962 (unpublished).Google Scholar