Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T02:25:39.691Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Experimental Evaluation of Computational Methods For Determining Lattice Parameters Using Bragg-Brentano Powder Diffractometry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

E.A. Payzant  and
H.W. King
E.A. Payzant
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Engineering, University of Western Ontario London, On, N6A 5B9, Canada
H.W. King
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Engineering, University of Western Ontario London, On, N6A 5B9, Canada
Get access

Abstract

Computational methods for determining precision lattice parameters based on extrapolation, lattice refinement, least squares and trial and error indexing, with intermediate corrections for peak positions using external and internal standards, have been evaluated with respect to the ICDD published values for zincite. Lattice parameters can be routinely determined to an accuracy of one part in ten thousand without the use of external or internal standards, by using computational extrapolation on data with a well aligned and maintained diffractometer. Lattice refinement determination of lattice parameters was only effective, with respect to the ICDD values, when used in conjunction with external and internal Standards. Least squares yielded results with low standard deviations, but the use of standards did not reduce the refined sample displacement or zero angle errors, and gave an increased error in lattice parameters with respect to the ICDD values. The trial and error indexing, which can only be used with peak positions corrected with respect to both external and internal standards, gave relatively low de Wolff and Smith-Snyder figures of merit, but nevertheless yielded lattice parameters of the highest accuracy of one part in twelve thousand, with respect to the ICDD values.

Type
Research Article
Information
Advances in X-Ray Analysis , Volume 37: Forty-Second Annual Conference on Applications of X-ray Analysis, August 2-6, 1993 , 1993 , pp. 87 - 93
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. King, H.W. and Payzant, E.A., “An Experimental Evaluation of Error Functions for Bragg-Brentano Diffractometry”, Adv. X-Ray Analysis, 36 663–670 (1993).Google Scholar
2. Smith, D.K., “Computer Analysis of Diffraction Data”, in Modern Powder Diffraction, Reviews in Mineralogy Vol. 20, Mineralogical Soc. of America, Washington, DC (1989).Google Scholar
3. Abrahams, S.C. and Bernstein, J. L., “Remeasurement of the Structure of Hexagonal ZnO”, Acta Cryst., B25 1233–1236 (1969).Google Scholar
4. Rachinger, W. A., “A Correction for the α1α2 Doublet in the Measurement of Widths of X-ray Diffraction Lines”, J. Sci. Instrum., 25 254–255 (1948).Google Scholar
5. Vogel, R.E. and Kempter, C.P., “A Mathematical Technique for the Precision Determination of Lattice Parameters”, Acta Cryst., 14, 1130–1134 (1961).Google Scholar
6. Burnham, C.W., “Lattice Constant Refinement”, Carnegie Inst, of Washington Yearbook, 61 132–135(1962).Google Scholar
7. Burnham, C.W., “Refinement of Lattice Parameters Using Systematic Correction Terms”, Carnegie Inst, of Washington Yearbook, 64 200–202 (1965).Google Scholar
8. Smith, G.S. and R.L, Snyder, “FN: A Criterion for Racing Powder Diffraction Patterns and Evaluating the Reliability of Powder-Pattern Indexing”, J.Appl. Cryst., 12, 60–65 (1979).Google Scholar
9. P.-E., Werner, L., Eriksson and M., Westdahl “TREOR, a Semi-Exhau stive Trial-and- F.rrnr Powder Indexing Program for”, J. Appl. Cryst., 18, 367–370 (1985).Google Scholar
10. P.M. de, Wolff, “A Simplified Criterion for the Reliability of a Powder Pattern Indexing”, J. Appl. Cryst., 1, 108–113 (1968).Google Scholar