Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T02:24:00.455Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

X-Ray Spectrometric Determination of Sulfate in Natural Waters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

C. A. Seils
Affiliation:
Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois 60439
G. T. Tisue
Affiliation:
Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois 60439
Get access

Extract

A recent surge of interest in sulfur in the environment has revealed the need for improved methods of analysis for sulfate, SO4=, in rain, freshwater and sediment interstitial fluids. Ion chromatography permits the rapid determination of SO4= in the ppm range (1 ppm = 1 mgL'1 = 10 μmol L-1 sulfate) on relatively small samples with good specificity. If a suitable instrument is available, this technique is a good choice for many environmental analyses. Other approaches to sulfate analysis are based on its precipitation with organic or heavy metal cations, usually barium or lead. The amount of precipitate formed may be determined by inter alia gravimetry, turbidimetry, radiometry (using 133-Ba), atomic absorption spectrophotometry (Ba or Pb detection), potentiometry (using a Pb++ ion selective electrode) , colorimetry, or by x-ray fluorescence spectrometry (Ba, Pb or S detection)(1). Because of our experience with x-ray fluorescence analyses, we chose to develop and test a procedure using that technique.

Type
XRF Applications in Environmental Analysis
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Fishman, M. J. and Erdman, D. E., “Water Analysis,” Anal. Chem. 49, 139R—158R (1977).Google Scholar
2. Larsen, R. P. and Tisue, G. T., “A Secondary-Source Energy- Dispersive X-Ray Spectrometer,” Radiological and Environmental Research Division Annual Report, January—December 1975, ANL- 75-60, Par t III, pp. 51—54.Google Scholar