Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T05:32:52.297Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

X-Ray Fluorescence in Cotton Modification Research

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

Donald Mitcham ,
Biagio Piccolo ,
Verne W. Tripp  and
Robert T. O’Connor
Donald Mitcham
Affiliation:
Southern Regional Research Laboratory New Orleans, Louisiana
Biagio Piccolo
Affiliation:
Southern Regional Research Laboratory New Orleans, Louisiana
Verne W. Tripp
Affiliation:
Southern Regional Research Laboratory New Orleans, Louisiana
Robert T. O’Connor
Affiliation:
Southern Regional Research Laboratory New Orleans, Louisiana
Get access

Abstract

The application of X-ray fluorescence to the qualitative and quantitative analysis of chemically modified cotton textile materials is described. The scope and flexibility of the technique have permitted the determination of more than 20 elements with, greatly reduced elapsed time compared with the corresponding spectroscopic or wet methods. Precautions to be observed in preparing standards are discussed. Results of the analysis of typical modifications and their significance in the development of cottons for specific uses are described.

Type
Research Article
Information
Advances in X-Ray Analysis , Volume 8: Thirteenth Annual Conference on Applications of X-ray Analysis, August 12-14, 1964 , 1964 , pp. 456 - 461
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1964

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Allan, J. E., “The Determination of Zinc in Agricultural Materials by Atomic-Absorption Spectroptiotometry,” Analyst 86:530–531, 1961.Google Scholar
2. Brysson, R. J., Reeves, W. A., and Piccolo, B., “The Cadmium Selenid.es—New Outdoor Fabric Fungicides,” Am. Dyestuff Reptr. 52:642–646, 1963.Google Scholar
3. Cheng, F. W., “Rapid Method for Microdetermination of Halogen in Organic Compounds,” Microchem. J. 3:537–542, 1959.Google Scholar
4. Gunn, E. L., “The Effect of Particles and Surface Irregularities on the X-Ray Fluorescent Intensity of Selected Substances,” Advances in X-Ray Analysis, Vol. 4, William M. Mueller (éd.), University of Denver, Plenum Press, New York, 1961, p. 382.Google Scholar
5. Liebhafsky, H. A., Pfeiffer, H. G., Winslow, G. H., and Zemany, P. D., X-Ray Absorption and Emission in Analytical Chemistry, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1960.Google Scholar
6. Lysyj, I. and Zarembo, J. E., “Spectrophotometric Method for the Determination of Small Amounts of Sulfur in Organic Compounds. A Semimicro- and Micromethod,” Microchem. J. 3:173–180, 1959.Google Scholar
7. Zinzadze, C., “Colorimetric Methods for the Determination of Phosphorus in the Presence of Silica, Arsenic, Iron and Nitrates,” Ind. Eng. Chem. Anal. Ed. 7:227–230, 1935.Google Scholar