Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T04:50:27.881Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Standard Reference Material Containing Nominally Four Percent Austenite

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

G.E. Hicho
Affiliation:
Institute for Materials Research, National Bureau of Standards, Washington, D. C. 20234
H. Yakowitz
Affiliation:
Institute for Materials Research, National Bureau of Standards, Washington, D. C. 20234
S.D. Rasberry
Affiliation:
Institute for Materials Research, National Bureau of Standards, Washington, D. C. 20234
R.E. Michaelis
Affiliation:
Institute for Materials Research, National Bureau of Standards, Washington, D. C. 20234
Get access

Abstract

This standard was produced by powder metallurgical techniques using known amounts of austenite. Using these techniques, 134 specimens were prepared. Because these standards are expected to be used primarily for the calibration of X-ray diffraction equipment, only one surface of each standard is certified, and these surfaces range from 3.1 percent to 5.2 percent in austenite content. To make the specimens, 310 stainless steel powder (austenitid) was blended with 430 stainless steel powder (ferritic) to make a mixture of 5 percent austenite in ferrite. The material was compacted, sintered, polished and etched so the austenite appears white and the ferrite, a deep brown. Then quantitative microscopy methods were used to determine the percentage of austenite near the surface. Furthers more, the 310 powder contains 20 percent of nickel while the 430 powder contains virtually no nickel. Therefore, after establishing a meaningful calibration curve, X-ray fluorescence analysis for the nickel content was also used as a direct measurement of the amount of retained austenite on the surface of the compact. Both procedures were carried out on fifteen specimens statistically selected from the total number of compacts produced. Agreement, within experimental error limits, was obtained between the X-ray fluorescence results and quantitative microscopy results. The X-ray fluorescence method was used to characterize all additional compacts. X-ray diffraction determinations of austenite content are in good agreement with the X-ray fluorescence and quantitative microscopy results. The compacts may be used as X-ray diffraction standards for austenite or in special cases as X-ray fluorescence standards for nickel content.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ogilvie, R. E., “Retained Austenite by X- rays”, Norelco Reporter, VI, 3, 60 (1959).Google Scholar
Moore, G. A., “Automatic Scanning and Computer Processes for the Quantitative Analysis of Micrographs and Equivalent Subjectsin Pictorial Pattern Recognition, Thompson Book Co., Washington, D. C. p. 275 (1968).Google Scholar
Claisse, F. and Samson, C., “Heterogeneity Effects in X- ray Analysis”, Advances in X- ray Analysis, 5, 335 (1962).Google Scholar