Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T09:18:21.341Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Spectrochemistry in the Iron Foundry: X-Ray Fluorescence vs. Optical Emission

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

Richard Gast
Richard Gast*
Affiliation:
Deere & Company Technical Center, Moline, Illinois 61265
Get access

Extract

The casting of iron is largely a chemical process: that is, the chemistry of molten iron greatly influences the properties of finished castings. Other parameters - casting design, mold integrity, inoculation practice, pouring temperature, and shakeout procedure - are also vital to consistent production. But if the chemistry is wrong, the probability of defective castings is high. For this reason, control of chemical composition has long been a major objective of foundrymen.

To be useful for either process control or quality assurance checking, analytical work must be reliable and accurate. Data should also be available in a minimal period of time to make possible the on-line adjustments necessary to achieve proper chemistry, and thus the desired properties, in the final castings.

Type
Research Article
Information
Advances in X-Ray Analysis , Volume 21: Twenty-Sixth Annual Conference on Applications of X-ray Analysis, August 3-5, 1977 , 1977 , pp. 35 - 42
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Dickens, P., Konig, P. and Jaensch, P., “The Spectrometric Analysis of Pig Irons and Low Carbon, Low Manganese Steels,” Archiv für das Eisenhüttenwesen, 37, 127–131 (1966), Brutcher Translation 6847.Google Scholar
2. Hughes, H., “The X-Ray Analysis of Blast Furnace Irons,” British Steel Corporation, Open Report CAC/17/73 (June 1973).Google Scholar
3. Kawamura, K. and Molita, N., “Emission Spectrochemical Analysis of Iron and Steel,” Tetsu to Hagané, 60 , 1795–1798 (1974), Brutcher Translation 9535.Google Scholar
4. Matsumura, T., Kotani, N., Goto, T. and Narita, K., “A Comparison of X-Ray Fluorescence and Emission Spectrometric Analysis of Pig Iron,” Tetsu to Hagane, 60, 1799–1804 (1974), Brutcher Translation 9462.Google Scholar
5. Determination of the Spectrochemical Working Curve (Philadelphia: American Society for Testing and Materials, 1974).Google Scholar
6. Jenkins, R., “A Survey of Mathematical Correction Procedures in X-Ray Spectrometry,” Advances in X-Ray Analysis, 19, 1–17 (1976).Google Scholar
7. Marr, H.E., “Six Models for Interelement Correction in X-Ray Analysis,” Advances in X-Ray Analysis, 19, 167–180 (1976).Google Scholar
8. Butterworth, A. and Hunt, M., “Determination of Correction Factors by Regression Analysis for the Analysis of Sulfur Using Optical Emission Spectrometry,” British Steel Corporation, Open Report GS/TECH/MISC/117/75/C (June 1976).Google Scholar
9. Plesch, R., “Empirical Matrix Corrections in Practical X-Ray Spectroscopy,” X-Ray Spectrometry, 5, 142–148 (1976).Google Scholar