No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Role of Residual Stresses as Determined by X-Ray Diffractometry on Magnetic Properties of 4-79 Molybdenum Permalloys
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 March 2019
Abstract
Residual stresses in several batches of heat-treated 4-79 molybdenum Permalloy finished laminations were measured by X-ray diffraction technique. This involved determination of macrostresses from line shift of (331) reflection by the two-exposure diffractometric technique as well as the determination of microstresses from half breadth of the same line profile. It was observed that the residual stresses In all batches of laminations were small and the variations in residual stresses from one batch of laminations to another were not appreciable, considering the scatter in laminations within each individual batch. Simultaneous magnetic measurements showed considerable variation in magnetic properties from batch to batch; e.g., a five-fold variation in normalized hysteresis loop and a two-fold variation in the magnetic “softness” parameter. On subjecting individual batches of laminations to various thermal and thermomagnetic treatments below 650 C, considerable change in magnetic properties was achieved without significantly changing residual stresses. The variation in magnetic properties in finished laminations was ascribed to the difference in effective crystal anisotropy and uniaxial anisotropy caused by variations in thermal and thermomagnetic annealing treatments. The study showed that the variation was not due to any major variation in stress induced magnetostrietive anisotropy.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1968
References
1.
Darling, H. E., “A Single Core Balanced Output Magnetic Amplifier,” Intermag Conference Proceedings, IEEE, New York, 1965, p. 7.2-1.Google Scholar
2.
Darling, H. E., “New Magnetic Amplifier Improves EMF to Current Converter,” IEEE Trans. Magnetics, Mag-3: 365, 1967.Google Scholar
3.
English, A. T. and Chin, G. Y., “Metallurgy and Magnetic Properties Control in Permalloy,” J. Appl. Phys.
38, 1183, 1967.Google Scholar
4.
Bozorth, R. M., “Ferromagnetlsm,” D. Van Nostrand Company, Inc., Princeton, New Jersey, 1951, p. 563.Google Scholar
5.
Neel, L., “Magnetic Surface Anisotropy and Oriented Superstructures (Directional. Order),” J. Phys. Radium, 15, 225, 1954.Google Scholar
6.
Darling, H. E., “An Instrument for Measuring Magnetic Core Noise,” to be published.Google Scholar
7.
Koves, G., “Determination of Magnetic Properties by Residual Stress Analysis in Soft Ferromagnetic Alloys,” Materials Research and Standardss November 1965, p. 573.Google Scholar
8.
Cullity, B. D., “Elements of X-Ray Diffraction,” Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., 1956, p. 431.Google Scholar
9.
Klug, H. P. and Alexander, L. E., “X-Ray Diffraction Procedures,” John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, 1966, p. 539.Google Scholar
10.
Taylor, A., “X-Ray Metallography,” John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, 1961, p. 724.Google Scholar
11.
Christenson, A. L. (ed.), Koistinen, D. P., Marburger, R. F., Semchyshen, M., and Evans, W. P., “Measurement of Stress by X-Ray,” SAE TR-182, Society of Automotive Engineers, 1960.Google Scholar
12.
Macherauch, E., “X-Ray Stress Analysis,” Experimental Mechanics, March 1966, p. 140.Google Scholar
13.
Bozorth, R. M., “Ferromagnetism,” D. Van Nostrand Company, Inc., Princeton, New Jersey, 1951, p. 139.Google Scholar
14.
Pfeiffer, F., “Zum Verstaendnis der Magnetischen Eigenschaften Technischer Permalloylegierungen,” Z. Metallic.
57, 295, 1966.Google Scholar
15.
Graham, C. D. Jr., “Magnetic Annealing,” Magnetic Properties of Metals and Alloys, ASM, Cleveland, Ohio, 1959, p. 288.Google Scholar