Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T11:36:33.306Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Quantitative Analysis of Dust Samples From Occupational Environments Using Computer-Automated X-Ray Diffraction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

M. T. Abell
Affiliation:
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 4676 Columbia Parkway, Cincinnati, Ohio 45226
D. D. Dollberg
Affiliation:
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 4676 Columbia Parkway, Cincinnati, Ohio 45226
J. V. Crable
Affiliation:
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 4676 Columbia Parkway, Cincinnati, Ohio 45226
Get access

Extract

The goal of the occupational health professions is ”… to assure so far as possible every working man and woman in the Nation safe and healthful working conditions and to preserve our human resources” (Occupational Safety and Health Act, PL91-596). When the health of workers is threatened by chemical agents in the air, occupational health chemistry has a role to play. Analyses of workplace air are performed by the thousands each year by industry and by state and federal agencies. In the federal government, these analyses, as well as occupational health work in general, are performed by three agencies: the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH, DHHS), which does occupational health research; the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA, DOL), which enforces safety and health standards in the general workplace; and the Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA, DOL), which enforces similar standards in mining operations.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods., Taylor, D. G.; Crable, J. V., Ed.; NIOSH Publication Nos. 77-157 (Vols. 1-3), 78-175 (Vol. 4), 79-141 (Vol. 5).Google Scholar
2. Lange, B. A.; Haartz, J. C., Determination of Microgram Quantities of Asbestos by X-Ray Diffraction: Chrysotile in Thin Dust Layers of Matrix Material, Anal. Chem., 51, 520 (1979).Google Scholar
3. Nenadic, C. M.; Crable, J. V., Application of X-Ray Diffraction to Analytical Problems of Occupational Health, Amer, Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J., 32, 529 (1971).Google Scholar
4. Dollberg, O. D.; Abell, M. T.; Lange, B. A., Occupational Health Analytical Chemistry: Quantitation Using X-Ray Powder Diffraction, Analytical Techniques in Occupational Health Chemistry, Dollberg, D. D.; Verstuyft, A. W., Ed., ACS Symposium Series 120, 1980pp 43-66.Google Scholar
5. Williams, P. P., Direct Quantitative Diffractometric Analysis, Anal. Chem., 31, 1842 (1959).Google Scholar
6. Leroux, J.; Davey, A. B. C.; Paillard, A., Proposed Methodology for The Evaluation of Silicosis Hazards, Amer. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J., 34, 409 (1973).Google Scholar
7. Bumsted, H. E., Free Silica Determination with an Automated X-Ray Diffractometer, presented at the Amer. Ind. Hyg. Conf., Houston (Abstract 135).Google Scholar
8. Abell, M. T.; Dollberg, D. D.; Lange, B. A.; Hornung, R. W.; Haartz, J. C., Absorption Corrections in X-Ray Diffraction Dust Analyses: Procedures Employing Silver Filters, Electron Microscopy and X-Ray Applications, Vol, II, Russe'l, P.; Hutchings, A., Ed., Ann Arbor Science Publishers, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan (1980).Google Scholar
9. Abell, M. T.; Dollberg, O. D., A Quantitative Analysis Software Package for Use with the APD 3500, Norelco Reporter, 25, (2), 21 (1978).Google Scholar
10. Slaughter, M. S. Deconvolution of X-Ray Spectra Produced by Mineral Samples, Electron Microscopy and X-Ray Applications, Vol. II, Russel, P.; Hutchings, A., Ed., Ann Arbor Science Publishers, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan (1980).Google Scholar