Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T04:48:07.279Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pole Figure Random Intensity Calculation Using Powder Integrated Ratios

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

Carlos Sergio Viana  and
Gustau Ferran
Carlos Sergio Viana
Affiliation:
COPPE-Universidade Federal do Rio de, Janeiro - Brasil - c.p. 1191 ZC 00
Gustau Ferran
Affiliation:
COPPE-Universidade Federal do Rio de, Janeiro - Brasil - c.p. 1191 ZC 00
Get access

Abstract

This paper describes a method for automatic quantitative pole figure plotting up to 70°, using only one sample and Schulz reflection technique. Random intensities are calculated for the usual planes of iron, using the ratios of calculated povder integrated intensities of these planes to the intensity of a high multiplicity factor plane, the random intensity of which had been obtained by integration up to 70° over the pole figure, using Bragg and Packer's method; the latter integration shows a decreasing error when the multiplicity factor increases. With this method it is possible to normalize the pole figures without using a physical standard and to reduce greatly the time to obtain a quantitative pole figure.

Type
Research Article
Information
Advances in X-Ray Analysis , Volume 17: Twenty-Second Annual Conference on Applications of X-ray Analysis, August 22-24, 1973 , 1973 , pp. 416 - 422
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Aoki, K., Hayami, S and Matsuo, M., “Improvement of the Accuracy in Representation of Conventional Pole Figures,” in Newkirk, J. B. and Mallett, G. R., Editors, Advanees in X-Ray Analysis, Vol. 10, p. 342(1967).Google Scholar
2. Hutchinson, W. B., Watson, T. W. and Dillamore, I. L., “Improved Drawability Through Control of Textures,” J. I. S. I., Nov. 1968, p. 1479 (1968).Google Scholar
3. Bragg, R. H. and Packer, C. M., “Quantitative Determination of Preferred Orientation,” J. Appl. Phys., 35, p. 1322 (1964).Google Scholar
4. Viana, C. S., Thesis “Metodo automático para traçado de figuras de polo”, COPPE, Centro Tecnologia, Universidad Federal do Rio de Janeiro, May, 1972.Google Scholar