Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T03:06:48.830Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A New Method for Fourier Analysis of Shapes of X-Ray Peaks and its Application to Line Broadening and Integrated Intensity Measurements

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

R. L. Rothman
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois
J. B. Cohen
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois
Get access

Abstract

A method of Fourier analysis of x-ray line broadening is presented whereby microstrain, incoherent particle size, and fault probability can be calculated using only first-order peaks. This method can thus be used in studies of catalysts, vapor- and electrodeposits or heavily textured specimens for which second-order peaks are too broad or weak, in cases where the effect of particle size is not the same for all orders of a peak, or for multiphase specimens where overlap of peaks sometimes occurs. Examples of deformed FCG and BCC metals and alloys are presented, with comparisons to the method of multiple orders.

One part of the procedure, first demonstrated by Pines and Sirenko, provides for reducing the effects of truncation on the Fourier coefficients. As a result, larger particle sizes can be analyzed and the integrated intensity can be determined more precisely. Application to determinations of volume fraction are given.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Warren, B. E., “X-ray Studies of Deformed Metals,” in Progress in Metal Physics, Vol. 8, Pergamon Press, New York, 1959, p. 147.Google Scholar
2. Hinton, R. W., Schwartz, L. H., and Cohen, J. B., “Effects of Additives on the Structure of Electrodeposited Silver,” J. Electrochem. Soc. 110 :103, 1963.Google Scholar
3. Vook, R. W. and Witt, F., “Substructure and Annealing Behavior of Metal Films Deposited on Glass Substrates near 80°K,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 2:49, 1965.Google Scholar
4. Warren, B. E. and Averbach, B. L., “The Effect of Cold-Work Distortion on X-ray Patterns,” J. Appl. Phys. 21:595, 1950.Google Scholar
5. Stokes, A. R., “A Numerical Fourier Analysis Method for the the Correction of Widths and Shapes of Lines on X-ray Powder Photographs,” Proc. Phys. Soc. London 61: 382, 1948.Google Scholar
6. Warren, B. E. and Averbach, B. L., “The Separation of Cold-Work Distortion and Particle Size Broadening in X-ray Patterns,” J. Appl. Phys. 23:497, 1952.Google Scholar
7. Harrison, J. W., “The Use of Strain Moments in Determining Scrain Distributions in Deformed Crystals,” Acta Cryst. 20:390, 1966.Google Scholar
8. Cohen, J. B. and Rothman, R. L., “The Effects of Faulting on [110] and (321) Planes of a BCC Diffraction Pattern,” Technical Report No. 11, Office of Naval Research, Contract NONR 1228(20), October, 1967.Google Scholar
9. Smith, R. S., “Measurement of Crystallite Size and Strain of Electroplated Films,” IBM J. of Research and Development 4:205, 1960.Google Scholar
10. Pines, B. Ya. and Sirenko, A. F., “Deviation of the Lattice Distortion and Spread in Block Size by Means of Harmonic Analysis Applied to X-ray Reflections,” Soviet Physics-Cryst. 7: 15, 1962.Google Scholar
11. McKeehan, M. and Warren, B. E., “X-ray Study of Cold-Work in Thoriatsd Tungsten,” J. Appl. Phys, 24:52, 1953.Google Scholar
12. Evans, W. P., Ricklefs, R. E. and Millan, J. F., “X-ray and Fatigue Studies of Hardened and Cold-Worked Steels,” in J. B. Cohen and J. E. Hilliard, Editors, Local Atomic Arrangements Studied by X-ray Diffraction, Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, New York, 1966, p. 351.Google Scholar
13. De Angelis, R. J., “Evaluations from X-ray Diffraction Profiles of Fourier Coefficients and the Microstrain Distribution Function,” in J. B. Cohen and J. E. Hilliard, Editors, Local Atomic Arrangements Studied by X-ray Diffraction, Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, New York, 1966, p. 271.Google Scholar
14. Mikkola, D. E. and Cohen, J. B., “The Substructure of Cu3Au After Tensile Deformation and Shock Loading,” Acta Met. 14:105, 1966; D. E. Mikkola, Ph.D. Thesis, Northwestern University, 1964.Google Scholar
15. Young, R. A., Gerdes, R. J. and Wilson, A. J. C., “Propagation of Some Systematic Errors in X-ray Line Profile Analysis,” Acta Cryst, 22:155, 1967.Google Scholar
16. Wert, J. J. and Buchanan, R. A., Personal Communication.Google Scholar
17. Greenough, G. B., “Quantitative X-ray Diffraction Observations on Strained Metal Aggregates,” in Progress in Metal Physics, Vol. 3, Pergamon Press, New York, 1952, p. 176.Google Scholar
18. Cullity, B. D., “Elements of X-ray Diffraction,” Addison-Wesley Publishers, Reading, Massachusetts, 1956, p. 446.Google Scholar
19. Cohen, J. B. and Wagner, C. N. J., “Determination of Twin Fault Probabilities from the Diffraction Patterns of FCC Metals and Alloys,” J. Appl. Phys, 33 :2073, 1962.Google Scholar
20. Aqua, E. N. and Wagner, C. N. J., “X-ray Diffraction Study of Deformation by Filing in BCC Refractory Metals,” Phil. Mag. 9 :565, 1964.Google Scholar
21. Mikkola, D. E. and Cohen, J. B., “Examples of Applications of Line Broadening,” in J. B. Cohen and J. E. Hilliard, Editors, Local Atomic Arrangements Studied by X-ray Diffraction, Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, New York, 1966, p. 319.Google Scholar
22. Siegel, S., “The Variation of thePrinciple Elastic Moduli of Cu3Au with Temperature.” Phys. Rev. 57: 537, 1940.Google Scholar
23. Warren, B. E. and Warekois, E. P., “Stacking Faults in Cold- Worked Alpha-Brass,” Acta Met. 3:473, 1955.Google Scholar
24. Wagner, C. N. J., (a) “Analysis of the Broadening and Changes in Position of Peaks in an X-ray Powder Pattern,” in J. B. Cohen and J. E. Hilliard, Editors, Local Atomic Arrangements Studied by X-ray Diffraction, Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, New York, 1966, p. 256; (b) Ibid., p. 248.Google Scholar
25. Koistinen, D. P. and Marburger, R. E., “A Simplified Procedure . for Calculating Peak Position in X-ray Residual Stress Measurements on Hardened Steel,” Trans. ASM 51:537, 1959.Google Scholar
26.For some sharp peaks linear dependence of lnAL with L2 may be found; this depends on the actual peak, slit function, etc. The main point here is that any simple functional dependence could be used to obtain A0 and hence a correction to the integrated intensity.Google Scholar