Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T04:44:54.248Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Methods for Depth Profiling Complete Stress Tensors Using Neutron Diffraction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

R.A. Winholtz
Affiliation:
Research Reactor Center and Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering University of Missouri Columbia, MO 65211
A.D. Krawitz
Affiliation:
Research Reactor Center and Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering University of Missouri Columbia, MO 65211
Get access

Extract

Neutron diffraction has proved to be a useful tool for measuring residual and applied stresses in materials. Aspects of experimental design and methods for the mapping of complete triaxial stress tensors in a large component are discussed in the context of a comprehensive set of stress measurements made within the interior of the circumferential weld on a 0.91 m diameter cylinder. The cylinder is a subscale model of the casings for the Advanced Solid Rocket Motor being designed for the space shuttle. The subscale model was fabricated in order to characterize the residual stresses created in the welding process and to determine the effect of post weld heat treatment on the residual stresses. Control of the residual stresses in this application is necessary to eliminate possible problems with stress corrosion cracking in a salt water environment. Some illustrative results are also presented.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Hutchings, M.T. and Krawitz, A.D., eds., “Measurement of Residual and Applied Stress Using Neutron Diffraction,’ Kluwer, Dordrecht (1992).Google Scholar
2. Noyan, I.C. and Cohen, J.B., “Residual Stress: Measurement by Diffraction and Interpretation,“ Springer-Verlag, New York (1987).Google Scholar
3. Winholtz, R.A. and Cohen, J.B., Generalised least-squares determination of triaxial stress slates by x-ray diffraction and the associated errors, Aust. J. Phys. 41:189199 (1988).Google Scholar
4. Hunt, James, private communication.Google Scholar
5. Krawitz, A.D. and Winholtz, R.A., Use of position-dependent stress-free standards for diffraction stress measurement, Mater. Sci. Engr., in press.Google Scholar
6. Popovici, M., Yelon, W.B., Berliner, R., Stoica, A.D., Ionita, I., and Law, R., Curved crystal optics and the resolution formalism: programs and optimization procedures, to appear in Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A, December (1993).Google Scholar
7. Krawitz, Aaron D., Residual Stress Analysis with Neutrons, Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 166:281292 (1990).Google Scholar
8. Schmank, M.J. and Krawitz, A.D., Measurement of a Stress Gradient through the Bulk of an Aluminum Alloy Using Neutrons, Met. Trans., 13A:10691076 (1982).Google Scholar
9. Tompson, C.W., Mildner, D. F. R., Mehregany, M., Sudol, J., Berliner, R., and Yelon, W.B., A Position Sensitive Detector for Neutron Powder Diffraction, J. Appl, Cryst., 17:385394 (1984).Google Scholar
10. Noyan, I.C., Determination of the Unstressed Lattice Parameter “a0” for (Triaxial) Residual Stress Determination by X-rays, Adv. X-ray Anal., 28:281288 (1985).Google Scholar
11. Witte, D.A., Winholtz, R.A., and Neal, S.P., Counting statistical errors in principal stresses and directions determined by diffraction, this volume.Google Scholar
12. James, M.R. and J.B, Cohen, Study of the Precision of X-ray Stress Analysis, Adv X-ray Anal 20:291307(1977).Google Scholar