Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T09:16:58.124Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Measurement of Residual Stresses by X-ray Diffraction Near Simulated Heat Affected Zones in Austenitic Stainless Steels*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

V. S. Iyer ,
R. W. Hendricks  and
S. A. David
V. S. Iyer
Affiliation:
Materials Engineering Department Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Blacksburg, Virginia, 24061
R. W. Hendricks
Affiliation:
Materials Engineering Department Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Blacksburg, Virginia, 24061
S. A. David
Affiliation:
Metals and Ceramics Division Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge, Tennessc 37830
Get access

Abstract

Simulated heat-affected zones (HAZs) were made in austenitic sta.inless steel specimens using a Gleeble. The samples were heated to temperatures as high as 1100°C by computer controlled resistance heating. By controlling the heating rate, maximum temperature, and cooling rate, a wide range of residual stresses were introduced in the specimens. Stress measurements were made using X-ray diffraction. It was found that significant stress gradients were produced in the simulated HAZs, and that all stresses were compressive in nature, both in the longitudinal and transverse directions. These results are not representative of the residual stresses determined in the HAZs of real welds, thus calling into question some aspects of the role of the Gleeble in such simulations.

Type
XII. Analysis of Stress and Fracture by Diffraction Methods
Information
Advances in X-Ray Analysis , Volume 34: Thirty-Ninth Annual Conference on Applications of X-ray Analysis, July 30 - August 3, 1990 , 1990 , pp. 623 - 631
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This work was supported by the 1989 and 1990 ORNL/OKAU/SURA Summer Research Institutes and by the Institute of Materials Science and Engineering of Virginia's Center for Innovative Technology.

References

[1] Dynamic Thermal / Mechanical Metallurgy with the Gleeble. 1500., Operators Manual, Duffers Scientific Incorporated, New York.Google Scholar
[2] Cullity, B. D., Elements of X-Ray Diffraction, 2nd ed., Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company Inc., (1978).Google Scholar
[3] Noyan, I. C., and Cohen, J. B., Residual Stress: Measurement by Diffraction and Interpretation, Springer-Verlag New York Inc., (1987).Google Scholar
[4] We are indebted to Mr. N. B. Schmidt of Carpenter Technology Corp. for providing the materials used in this study.Google Scholar
[5] VSI and RWH would like to express their gratitude to the staff of the Welding Group of the Metals and Ceramics Division of ORNL for their generous support and especially for access to the Gleeble 1500 which was so crucial to the success of this project.Google Scholar
[6] Iyer, V. S., Effect of Residual Stress Gradients in Austenitic Stainless Steel on Stress Corrosion Cracking, MSc thesis, VPI&SU, (October 1990).Google Scholar
[7] EPRI Nondestructive Evaluation Center, BWR Recirculating Piping System Placement, Volume 2: Supporting Documentation for Final Report, EPRI Report NP- 6723-D, Volume 2, Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, California, (June, 1990).Google Scholar
[8] Alvarado, C. and Hendricks, R. W., personal communication of unpublished research, (May, 1990).Google Scholar
[9] ASTM G36-73, Standard Practice for Performing Stress Corrosion Cracking Tests in a Boiling Magnesium Chloride Solution, 1987 Annual Book of Standards, American Society for Testing Materials, (1987), Vol. 302, pp. 209-217.Google Scholar