Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T05:36:47.997Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Lunar X-Ray Diffraction Experiment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

Robert C. Speed
Affiliation:
California Institute of Technology Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, California
Douglas B. Nash
Affiliation:
California Institute of Technology Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, California
Neil L. Nickle
Affiliation:
California Institute of Technology Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, California
Get access

Abstract

An X-ray diffraction system is under development for remote analysis of lunar rocks from an unmanned, soft-landed spacecraft. The objective of this experiment is the identification of rock-forming phases and estimation of their abundances, compositions, and other data which are indicative of the nature of genetic processes on the moon. A 2:1 scanning parafocusing geometry was successfully miniaturized for this purpose by W. Pavrish, and a complete diffraction system, based on the design is in preparation. The diffract ometer including high-voltage power supply weighs 18 lb, occupies 0.9 ft3, and requires 56 W of continuous power. A sample acquisition and preparation system will be an integral part of the diffractometer. Diffraction analyses of a rhyolite, basalt, and chondritic meteorite are given as examples of the capabilities and limitations of rock analysis by this method.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1964

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Parrish, W., Lunar Diffractometer Geometry (in press), 1964.Google Scholar
2. Kopal, Z. (ed.), Physics and Astronomy of the Moon, Academic Press, New York, 1962.Google Scholar
3. Orrok, G. T., Meteoric Infall and Lunar Surface Roughness, Bellcomm report, NASA, 1963.Google Scholar
4. Gibson, J. E., “Lunar Surface Characteristics Indicated by the March 19Û0 Eclipse and Other Observations,” Astron. J. 1961.Google Scholar
5. Nash, D. B., “New Technique for Quantitative SiO2 Determinations of Silicate Materials by X-Ray Diffraction Analysis of Glass,” Advances in X-Ray Analysis, Vol. 7, Plenum Press, 1963.Google Scholar
6. Tatlock, D. B., “Rapid Quantitative Estimates of Quart? and Total Iron in Silicate Rocks by X-Ray Diffraction,” U.S. Geol. Survey Prof. Paper 424, 1961.Google Scholar
7. Klug, H. P. and Alexander, L., X-Ray Diffraction Procedures, Wiley & Sons, New York, 1954.Google Scholar
8. Tuttle, O. F. and Bowen, N. L., “Origin of Granite in Light of Experimental Studies in System NaAlSi3O8-KAlSi3O8-H2O,” Geol. Soc. Amer. Memoir 74, 1958.Google Scholar
9. Kuno, H. and Hess, H. H., “Unit Cell Dimensions of Oinoenstatite and Pigeonite in Relation to Common Pyroxenes,” Amer, Jour. Set., 251, 1953.Google Scholar
10. Brown, G. M., “The Effect of Iron Substitution on the Unit Cell Dimensions of Common Clinopyroxenes,” Amer. Min, 45, 1960.Google Scholar
11. Urey, H. C., The Planets, Yale Univ. Press, 1952.Google Scholar
12. Yoder, H. S. and Sahama, T., “Olivine X-Ray Determination Curve,” Amer. Min., 42, 1957.Google Scholar
13. Pollack, S. S. and Ruble, W. D., “X-Ray Identification of Ordered and Disordered Orthoenstatite,” Amer. Min., 49, 1964.Google Scholar
14. Keil, K. and Fredrickson, K., “The Iron, Magnesium, and Calcium Distribution in Coexisting Olivines and Rhombic Pyroxenes of Chondrites,” J. Geophys. Res. 1963.Google Scholar