Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T18:49:43.421Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Kossel Line Micro-Diffraction Stum on Precipitation of Alpha from Beta in Copper Zinc Alloys

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

Gunji Shiwoda ,
Kenji Isokawa  and
Masataka Umeno
Gunji Shiwoda
Affiliation:
Osaka University, Faculty of Engineering, Higashinoda Miyakojima, Osaka, Japan
Kenji Isokawa
Affiliation:
Osaka University, Faculty of Engineering, Higashinoda Miyakojima, Osaka, Japan
Masataka Umeno
Affiliation:
Osaka University, Faculty of Engineering, Higashinoda Miyakojima, Osaka, Japan
Get access

Abstract

By the electron microprobe Kossel technique, an a-precipitate at a grain boundary of a Cu-45wt% Zn alloy was found to consist of only one crystal and the orientation relationship between the a precipitate and one of the grains beside the grain boundary was (110)β//(111)α and <111>β//<110>α. This is the same relationship as the case α a precipitates in β-phase grains. A little deviation from the exact coincidence of above orientation relationship was observed. The vacancy model for the production of a denuded zone in the same alloy was confirmed by a line scanning analyses using an electron microprobe. An effect or orientation differences was observed on the specimen current of the electron microprobe. This effect was attributed to a channelling phenomenon. The influence of ths channelling effect on quantitative analyses by electron microprobe was considered for the precipitated a-phase and matrix β-phase, and the massive a precipitates were found to consist of many crystallites having different orientations. From the lattice constant of the g-phase determined by the Kossel patterns, the concentration of zinc at the target point was obtained in good agreement with the value obtained by quantitative analyses using an electron microprobe. Thus, in some cases, the Kossel technique can be utilized for the quantitative analysis of a small portion without any corrections which are necessary In the case of electron microprobe.

Type
Research Article
Information
Advances in X-Ray Analysis , Volume 12: Seventeenth Annual Conference on Applications of X-ray Analysis, August 21-23, 1968 , 1968 , pp. 174 - 187
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Straumanis, M. and Weerts, J., “Über die Ausscheidung der α-Phase im β-Messing,” Z. Phys., 78: 1016, 1932.Google Scholar
2. Shinoda, G. and Amano, Y., “Mechanism of Precipitation of α from β in 60:40 Brass,” J. Phys. Soc. Japan, 6, 508–512, 1951.Google Scholar
3. Bowles, F. S. and Barrett, C. S., “Crystallography of Transformations,” in B. Chalmers, Editor, Progress in Metal Physics, Vol. 3, Pergamon Press, London, 1952, p. 1–41.Google Scholar
4. Halbig, H., Kessler, H., and Pitsh, W., “Bestimmung der HaMtusebene des im Martensit rttckumgewandelten Austenits mit Hilfe von Kossel-Diagrammen,” Acta Met., 15: 1894–1896, 1967.Google Scholar
5. Bevis, M. and Swindells, N., “The Determination of the Orientation of Micro-Crystals Using a Back-Reflection Kossel Technique and an Electron Probe Microanalyser,” Phys. Stat. Sol., 20: 197–212, 1967.Google Scholar
6. Castaing, R., “Electron Probe Microanalysis,” in L. Marton, Editor, Advances in Electronics and Electron Physics, Vol. 13, Academic Press, New York, 1960, p. 317–386.Google Scholar
7. Lonsdale, K., “Divergent-Beam X-Ray Photography of Crystals,” Phil. Trans., 240: 219–250, 1947.Google Scholar
8. Owen, E. A. and Pickup, L., “X-Ray Study of Phase Boundaries in Thermal Diagrams of Alloy Systems — Cu-Zn System,” Proc. Roy. Soc. (London), A137: 397–417, 1932.Google Scholar
9. Geisler, A. H. and Hill, J. K., “Analyses and Interpretations of X-Ray Diffraction Effects in Patterns of Aged Alloys,” Acta Cryst., 1: 238–252, 1948.Google Scholar
10. e.g., Rosenbaum, H. S. and Turnbull, D., “Metallographic Investigation of Precipitation of Silicon from Aluminum,” Acta Met., 7: 664–674, 1959.Google Scholar
11. Kelly, A. and Nicholson, R. B., in B. Chalmers, Editor, Progress in Materials Science, Vol. 10, Pergamon Press, London, 1963, p. 149–391.Google Scholar
12. Embury, J. L. and Nicholson, H. B., “The Nucleation of Precipitates : The System Al-Zn-Mg,” Acta Met., 13: 403–417, 1965.Google Scholar
13. Shinoda, G. and Amano, Y., “The Butectoid Transformation of the β'-Phase in Cu-Zn Alloys,” Trans. JIM., 1: 54–57, 1960.Google Scholar
14. Shinoda, G., Kawabe, H., Murata, K., and. Shirai, T., “Improvement of Resolving Power of the Electron Probe Microanalyzer by the Specimen Current Method and Its Application to Metallurgical Problems,” Technol. Hepts. Osaka Univ., 16: 423–429, 1966.Google Scholar