Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T14:06:54.555Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Investigation of Elemental Analysis of Water Samples by Radioalpha Induced X-Ray Emission Spectroscopy*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

R. Hight
Affiliation:
University of Missouri - St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri 63121
C. C. Foster*
Affiliation:
University of Missouri - St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri 63121
*
Present address Physics Department - Cyclotron Laboratory, University of Indiana, Bloomington, Indiana 47401.
Get access

Abstract

Alpha particles and protons from charged particle accelerators and photons from both x-ray tubes and radioactive sources have been shown to be useful for the excitation of characteristic x-rays for multi-element energy dispersive trace analysis of environmental samples to the few ppm range. We have investigated the use of 4.5 MeV alpha particles from a thin window Po-210 source of 5 mCi effective strength to directly excite x-rays from trace elements in 1 cc water samples evaporated on 1.75 mg/cm2 thick mylar backings in a helium atmosphere in a lucite enclosure. Minimum detectable amounts (MDA's) were established for 19 elements (22 ≤ Z ≤ 82) using K-, L- and M- radiation and 50 minute counting times. The smallest MDA determined was 0.11 μg for vanadium. Other representative MDA's, in μg, are Fe-0.54, Mo-0.31 and Pb-0.43. MDA's lower by an average factor of about 10 over an eight month source life would result from the use of 1 Ci of Po-210 for 50 minutes per sample. Thinner sample backings and improved source encapsulation will reduce background radiation and further improve sensitivity. Comparison of our MDA's (5 mCi-Po-210) with those of Blasius et al., who used radiophoton sources and 40,000 sec. counting times to determine trace metal pollutants in water samples, shows radioalpha excitation to have comparable sensitivity in the worst case, arsenic and better, by more than two orders of magnitude, sensitivity in the best case, vanadium.

Radioalpha induced x-ray trace element analysis offers the same advantages of portability, ease of operation, low maintenance and cost, and "in house" availability as radiophoton induced analysis. Because of the availability of more intense sources (up to 10 Ci), the fact that the detected radiation (x-rays) differs from the excitation radiation (a-particles) and that K, L, and M x-ray emission cross-sections depend essentially only on the emitted x-ray energy, lower MDA's are obtainable for many elements in thin samples for comparable counting times, as well.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Work supported by the Department of Interior through the Office of Water Resources Research Center, University of Missouri - Columbia.

References

1. Blasius, M. B., Kerkhoff, S, J., Wright, R. W., and Cothem, C. R., “Use of X-Ray Fluorescence to Determine Trace Elements in Water Resources”, Water Resources Bulletin 8, 704714 (1972).Google Scholar
2. Goulding, F. S. and Jaklevic, J. M., “Photon-Excited Energy Dispersive X-Ray Fluorescence Analysis for Trace Elements”, in E. Segre, Editor, Annual Review of Nuclear Science, Vol. 23, p. 4574, Annual Reviews, Inc. (1973).Google Scholar
3. Folkman, F., Gaarde, C., Fluus, T., and Kemp, K., “Proton Induced X-Ray Emission as a Tool for Trace Element Analysis”, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. 116, 487499 (1974).Google Scholar
4. Sellers, B., Wilson, H., and Hauser, F. A., “Generation and Practical Use of Monoenergetic X-Rays from Alpha Emitting Isotopes”, Report No. NYO-3491-3 October 1968.Google Scholar
5. Rutledge, C. H. and Watson, R. L., “Cross Sections for K-Shell Ionization by 1H, 2H, 3He, and 4He Ion Impact”, Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables 12, 195-216 (1973).Google Scholar
6. Khandelwal, G. S., Choi, B. H., and Merzbacher, E., “Tables for Born Approximation Calculations of K- and L- Shell Ionization by Protons and Other Charged Particles”, Atomic Data 1, 103-120 (1969).Google Scholar
7. Flocchini, R. G., Feeney, P. J., Sommerville, R. J., and Cahill, T. A., “Sensitivity Versus Target Backings for Elemental Analysis by Alpha Excited X-Ray Emission”, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. 100, 397402 (1972).Google Scholar
8.Nuclear Science Group Technical Report, Research Reactor Facility, University of Missouri - Columbia, James R. Vogt, Editor, p. 27-47 (1971).Google Scholar
9. Bearse, R. C., Close, D. A., Malanify, J. J., and Umbarger, C. J., “Production of Kα and Lα X-Rays by Protons of 1.0 - 3.7 MeV”, Phys. Rev. A7, 12691272 (1973).Google Scholar
10. Lederer, C. M., Hollander, J. M., and Perlman, I., Table of Isotopes, 6th Edition, p. 396, John Wiley (1968).Google Scholar