Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T03:04:27.783Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Internal Strain (Stress) in an Sic/Al Particle-Reinforced Composite

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

H. M. Ledbetter
Affiliation:
Fracture and Deformation Division Institute for Materials Science and Engineering national Bureau of Standards, BoulderColorado 80303
M. W. Austin
Affiliation:
Fracture and Deformation Division Institute for Materials Science and Engineering national Bureau of Standards, BoulderColorado 80303
Get access

Abstract

Silicon carbide and 6061 aluminum alloy possess very different thermalexpansion coefficients; 3-3 and 22.5.10-6K-1, respectively. Thus, one expects large internal strains and stresses in these composites because the two constituents form interfacial bonds at high temperatures and are cooled to ambient temperatures. From a simple elastic model, one expects a hydrostatic tensile stress in the aluminum matrix and a-hydrostatic compressive stress in the silicon-carbide particles. Using conventional diffraction geometry, using Cu Kα radiation, we studied three surfaces of a plate specimen. For both phases, we determined the unit-cell dimensions for two situations: unmixed and mixed in the final composite. The silicon-carbide particles showed a compressive stress and the aluminum matrix a tensile stress, seventy-five percent of the yield strength. Measurements show that both stress tensors are approximately hydrostatic.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Barrett, C.S. and Predecki, P., Adv. X-Ray Anal. 23, 331332 (1980). See references therein.Google Scholar
2. Tsai, S.-D., Mahulikar, D., Marcus, H.L., Noyan, I.C., and Cohen, J.B., Mater. Sci. Eng. 47, 145149 (1981).Google Scholar
3. Arsenault, R.J. and Taya, M., Proceedings ICCM-V. San Diego, July 1985), forthcoming.Google Scholar
4. Evenehor, P.D. and Hauk, V., Z. Metallk. 66, 164 — 168 (1975).Google Scholar
5. Dölle, H., J. Appl. Cryst. 12, 489501 (1979).Google Scholar
6. Barrett, C.S. and Massalski, T.B., Structure of Metals (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1966), pp. 466-485.Google Scholar