Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T01:44:09.000Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Intensities of the K, L, and M Spectral Lines for the Elements with Atomic Numbers 16 TO 92*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

William J. Campbell*
Affiliation:
Bureau of Mines, U.S. Department of the Interior College Park, Maryland
Get access

Abstract

Line intensity and background measurements were made on the K lines for the elements with atomic numbers 16 to 60, L lines for the elements above atomic number 42, and M lines for elements above atomic number 80. Three general classes of samples were investigated: (1) infinitely thick, (2) microgram deposits, and (3) thin layers.

These studies show that longer-wavelength L radiation may be preferable to the K series lines from the same element in the range of elements with atomic numbers 42 to 60, In particular the Lα lines are more intense than the K series lines from Class 2 and 3 samples. With Class 1 samples the Lα lines are weaker than the K series but their line-to-background ratio is superior to the K series.

M series lines show little promise for spectrochemical analysis except for elements with atomic numbers 90 to 92; for example, with uranium samples in Class 2 and 3, the very high line-to-background ratio of the UMβ1 line may have limited application.

Elements with atomic numbers from 16 to 22 are more sensitive than expected due to the very high line-to-background ratios and the reduced collimation requirements in this longwavelength region.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1959

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This paper was presented at the Seventh Annual Conference. Approval for publication was received too late for Inclusion in the Proceedings of that conference.

References

1 Richtmyer, F. K. and Kennard, E. H., “Introduction to Modern Physics,” McGraw-Hill Book Company, 4th Edition, 1947, p. 451.Google Scholar
2 Jennings, W. A., “A Theoretical Study of Radiation Outputs and Qualities from a Beryllium Window Tube Operated at Low Kilovoltages (10-50 kvp),” Brit. J. Radiology, Vol. 26, 1953, p. 193.Google Scholar
3 Campbell, W. J., Leon, M., and Thatcher, J. W., “Flat Crystal Xray Optics,” Proceedings 6th Annual X-ray Conference, Denver Research Institute, 1957, p. 193.Google Scholar
4 Compton, A. H. and Allison, S. K., “X-Rays in Theory and Experiment,” D. Van Nostrand Company, 2nd Edition, 1935, pp. 394425, 511-540.Google Scholar
5 Stephenson, R. J., “X-Ray Fluorescence Yields,” Phys, Rev. Vol. 51, 1937, p. 637.Google Scholar
6 Campbell, W. J. and Leon, M., “Preliminary Studies of Selective Oxidation in Molten Metals by Fluorescent X-Ray Spectrography,” Pittsburgh Conference on Analytical Chemistry and Applied Spectroscopy, Paper 70, March 1958.Google Scholar