Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T15:35:57.274Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Evaluation and Improvement of X-Ray Emission Analysis of Raw-Mix and Finished Cements

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

George Andermann  and
J. D. Allen
George Andermann
Affiliation:
Applied Research Laboratories, Inc., Glendale, California
J. D. Allen
Affiliation:
Applied Research Laboratories, Inc., Glendale, California
Get access

Abstract

With modern X-ray instruments, precision is generally satisfactory for the analysis of MgO, Al2O3, SiO2, CaO, and Fe2O3 in finished and raw-mix cements and other similar materials. Accuracy, that is, agreement between cheraicaland X-ray values, quite frequently is much worse than precision. Some typical examples illustrating this point are reviewed.

In the soft region, generally, it has not been possible to assign the cause of iuaccuracy to interelement effects. The hypothesis is formulated that in the soft region this problem could be due to mineralogical differences and inhomogeneity on a micro scale. Theoretical calculations support the plausibility of this argument.

To improve accuracy, present techniques have been based on type standardization, acid digestion fusion using a high flux-to-sample ratio, etc. In general, these methods have certain basic limitations. In order to retain useful intensities and lineto- background ratios for the soft region, 8 new fusion technique has been developed. The experimental data based on this method of reducing micro-inhomogeneity and eliminating minaralogical differences indicate improvements in accuracy. In the case of finished cements the improvements in accuracy have been quite modest. With rawmix cements, startling improvements have been obtained for the analysis of SiO2 and CaO.

Type
Research Article
Information
Advances in X-Ray Analysis , Volume 4: Ninth Annual Conference on Applications of X-ray Analysis, August 10-12, 1960 , 1960 , pp. 414 - 432
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1960

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Anderniann, G., Jones, J. L., and Davidson, E., “The Evaluation of the PXQ for the Analysis of Cements and Related Materials,” Advances In X-Ray Analysis, Vol, 2, University of Denver, Plenum Press, New York, 1960, p. 215.Google Scholar
2. Kiley, W. R., “A Universal Detector for the X-ray Spectograph,” Advances in X-Ray Analysis, Vol. 2, University of Denver, Plenum Press, New York, 1960, p. 293.Google Scholar
3. Crooke, J. F. and Kiley, W. R., “Determination of Iron, Calcium, Silicon, Aluminum, and Magnesium in Raw-Mix Cement,” Norelco Reporter, Vol. 6, No. 1, 1959, p. 29,Google Scholar
4. Curley, E. A., “Quantitative Light Element Analysis FetoMg for Portland Cement hy X-ray Spectrography,” presented at the Third Pacific Area National Meeting of the American Society for Testing Materials, October 1959, San Francisco.Google Scholar
5. Rester, B. E., “Developments in X-ray Spectrography in the Cement Manufacturing Process During 1959 and 1960,” presented to the À1EE Cement Industry Conference, May 1960, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.Google Scholar
6. Loranger, W. G.. “Developments in X-ray Spectrography in the Cement Manufacturing Process during 1959 and 1960,” presented to the AIEE Cement Industry Conference, May 1960, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.Google Scholar
7. Andermann, G. and Murphy, G. R., “The PXQ Analysis of Steel-Making Slags, “ presented before the 1959 Pittsburgh Conference on Analytical Chemistry and Applied Spectroscopy, available as Applied Research Laboratories Report No. 1608.Google Scholar
8.Data gathered in the author's laboratory.Google Scholar
9.“The X-ray Analysis of Metallic Elements in Nonmetallic Material,” ARL Spectrographer's News Letter, Vol. 7, No. 3, 1954.Google Scholar
10. Claisse, F., “Accurate X-ray Fluorescence Analysis Without Internal Standard,” Department of Mines, Province of Quebec, P.R. No. 327, 1956.Google Scholar
11.“The PXQ, A Direct-Reading X-ray Polychromator,” ARL Spectrographer'sNews Letter, Vol. 11, No. 3, 1958.Google Scholar
12.“The XIP, X-ray Industrial Polychromator,” ARL Spectrographer's News Letter, Vol. 12, No. 1, 1960.Google Scholar
13. Davidson, E., Gilkerson, A. W., and Neuhaus, H., “Direct-Reading X-ray Polychromators for Research and Production Control,” presented at the 1960 Pittsburgh Conference on Analytical Chemistry and Applied Spectroscopy.Google Scholar
14. Hasler, M. F. and Kemp, J. W., “Suggested Practices for Spectrochemical Computations, “ Methods for Emission Spectrochemical Analysis, ASTM Committee E-2, p. 81, ASTM, 1957, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
15. Kemp, J. W. and Andermann, George, “Refinements In X-ray Emission Techniques, “ presented before the 1956 Pittsburgh Conference on Analytical Chemistry and Applied Spectroscopy.Google Scholar
16.“A Cooperative Investigation of Precision and Accuracy in Chemical, Spectrochemical, and Modal Analysis of Silicate Recks,” U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 980, Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar