Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T01:24:28.422Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Errors in Dual X-Ray Beam Differential Absorptiometry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

F. Bolin ,
L. Preuss ,
K. Gilbert  and
C. Bugenis
F. Bolin
Affiliation:
Dept, of Physics and Biophysics, Edsel B. Ford Institute for Medical Research, 2799 W. Grand Blvd. Detroit, MI 48202.
L. Preuss
Affiliation:
Dept, of Physics and Biophysics, Edsel B. Ford Institute for Medical Research, 2799 W. Grand Blvd. Detroit, MI 48202.
K. Gilbert
Affiliation:
Sandia Laboratories, Experiments Division I, Albuquerque, NM 87115
C. Bugenis
Affiliation:
Dept, of Physics and Biophysics, Edsel B. Ford Institute for Medical Research, 2799 W. Grand Blvd. Detroit, MI 48202.
Get access

Abstract

Errors pertinent in dual beam absorptiometry have been studied. Five areas are given in detail: 1. Scattering, in which a computer analysis of multiple scattering shows little error. 2. Geometrical configuration effects, in which the shape of the sample influences accuracy. 3. Poisson variations, in which dosage and statistical error are minimized. 4. Absorption coefficients, in which variations in compilations are examined. 5. Filtering, wherein is shown the need for Kβ filtering. A zero filter system is outlined.

Type
Research Article
Information
Advances in X-Ray Analysis , Volume 21: Twenty-Sixth Annual Conference on Applications of X-ray Analysis, August 3-5, 1977 , 1977 , pp. 155 - 169
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

(1) Mazess, R.B., Cameron, J.R., and Sorenson, J.A., AEC Report No. C00-1422-55, 1969.Google Scholar
(2) Preuss, L.E. and Schmonsees, W., “109Cd for Compositional Analysis of Soft Tissue, “ International Journal of Applied Radiation and Isotopes, 23, pp. 9–12, (1972).Google Scholar
(3) Preuss, L.E. and Bolin, F.P., “In Vivo Tissue Analysis with “109Cd”, Isotope and Radiation Technology, Vol. 9, No. 4, pp. 501–504, (1972).Google Scholar
(4) Preuss, L.E., and Bolin, F.P., “In Vivo Analysis of Lipid-Protein Ratios in Human Muscle by Differential X-Ray Absorption Using 109cd Photons”, Advances in X-Ray Analysis, Vol. 16, pp. 111–123, Plenum, New York, 1972.Google Scholar
(5) Watt, D.E., “Optimum Photon Energies for the Measurement of Bone Mineral and Fat Fractions”, British Journal Radiology, 18: pp. 265–274, 1975.Google Scholar
(6) McMaster, W.H., Kerr Della-Grande, N., Mallett, J.H., and Hubbell, J.H., Compilation of X-Ray Cross Sections, UCR2- 50174 Lawrence Livermore Laboratory, May 1969.Google Scholar
(7) Storm, E. and Israel, H.I., Nuclear Data Tables A7, pp. 565–681, 1970.Google Scholar
(8) Biggs, F. and Lighthill, R., Analytical Approximations for X-Ray Cross Sections II, Sandia Laboratories, Albuquerque, Mew Mexico, 1971.Google Scholar
(9) Bolin, F.P. and Preuss, L.E., “Iterative Method for Elimination of the K Filter in Dual-Beam Differential Tissue Absorptiometry”, Medical Physics: 4, 3 pp. 209–210, 1977.Google Scholar