Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T17:13:09.008Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Dual Detector Diffractometer for Measurement of Residual Stress

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

C. M. Mitchell
C. M. Mitchell*
Affiliation:
Physical Metallurgy Research Laboratories CAHMET, Department of Energy, Mines and Resources, Ottawa
Get access

Abstract

The diffractometer employs dual fixed detectors and a moving, vertically mounted X-ray tube. Lattice strain is measured in two specimen directions simultaneously. The drive has three concentric shafts; the outer driven by a cone drive worm and gear; a middle fixed shaft supporting the detectors and an inner shaft geared in a 1:2 ratio carrying the specimen mount. Scanning angles are measured to an accuracy of ±0.001°. A large range of specimen sizes can be accommodated.

Type
X-Ray Diffraction Stress Analysis
Information
Advances in X-Ray Analysis , Volume 20: Twenty-Fifth Annual Conference on Applications of X-ray Analysis, August 4-6, 1976 , 1976 , pp. 379 - 391
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Gisen, F., Glocker, R. and Osswald, E., “Original Mitteilungen Einzelbestimmung von Elastischen Stannungen mit Röentgenstrahlen”, Z. Tech. Physik 17, 145 (1936).Google Scholar
2. Barrett, C. S., and Massalski, T. B., “Structure of Metals”, 3 ed., Ch. 17, McGraw Hill, N.Y. (1966).Google Scholar
3. Mitchell, C. M., “Direct Determination of the Reciprocal Lattice and Radial Interference Distribution by the Fourier Method”, Advances in X-ray Analysis, Vol. 12, p.352–354, Pergamon Press (1968).Google Scholar
4. Stokes, A. R., “Fourier Analysis for the Correction of Width and Shapes of Diffraction Lines”, Phys. Soc., London, 61, 328 (1948).Google Scholar
5. Mitchell, C. M. and deWolff, P. M., “Elimination of the Dispersion Effect in the Analysis of Diffraction Line Profiles”, Acta Cryst. 22, 325 (1967).Google Scholar
6. Singh, A. K. and Balasingh, C., “The Effect of X-ray Diffractometer Geometrical Factors on the Centroid Shift of a Diffraction line for Stress Measurement”, J. Appl. Phys. 42, 5254 (1971).Google Scholar