No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Depth of Saw and Lap Damage in Germanium
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 March 2019
Abstract
A study utilizing an application of X-ray diffraction analysis has been made to determine the depth of surface damage in s ingle-crystal wafers of germanium. Damage was introduced by mechanical lapping and sawing. A scintillation-counter double-crystal diffractometer system was used with a 3-m evacuated collitnator. This experimental arrangement employed the (220) reflection, from a silicon monochromator, using Cu Kα1 radiation. All wafers were taken from dislocation-free crystals which were subsequently centerless ground, sawed, lapped, and etched. Half-widths were determined for the sawed and lapped conditions. Successive etchings were used to remove the damaged surface layer with the resulting halfwidths being plotted as a function of thickness removed and etching time.
The depths of damage—8.0 ± 0.7 μ for sawing and 3.0 ± 0.7 μ for lapping—were indicated by the depth at which the line breadth measurements reached a limiting value. For crystals used in this study, the median value for this limiting half-width was 28″. The experimental data expressing the rate of etching indicates the presence of two separate rates—one for the damaged material and one for the undamaged substrate. An unexpected finding is a faster etch rate for the undamaged material than that observed for the damaged layer. Quite good correlation is obtained between the depth of damage as determined by X-ray and etching techniques.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1963
References
1.
Buck, T. M., Discussion to “Etching of Abraded Germanium Surfaces with CP-4 Reagant,” by E. N. Pugh and L. E. Samuels and “A Metallographic Investigation of the Damaged Layer in Abraded Germanium Surfaces,” by E. N. Pugh and L. E. Samuels, J. Electrochem. Soc.
109: 1220, 1962.Google Scholar
2.
Pugh, E. N. and Samuels, L. E., “A Metallographic Investigation of the Damaged Layer in Abraded Germanium Surfaces,” J. Electrochem. Soc.
108: 1043, 1961.Google Scholar
3.
Buck, T. M. and McKim, F. S., “Depth of Surface Damage Due to Abrasion on Germanium,” J. Electrochem. Soc.
103: 593, 1956.Google Scholar
4.
Camp, P. R., “Etching Rate of Single-Crystal Germanium,” J . Electrochem. Soc.
102: 586, 1955.Google Scholar
5.
Cole, H., Chambers, F. W., and Wood, C. G., “Some Geometrical Considerations for X-Ray Collimation in Single-Crystal Diffraction Work,” Rev. Sci. Instr.
33: 435, 1962.Google Scholar
6.
Darwin, C. G., “The Theory of X-Ray Reflection. Parts I and II,” Phil. Mag.
27: 315 and 675, 1914.Google Scholar
7.
Prins, J. A., “The Reflection of X-Rays on Absorbing Ideal Crystals,” Z. Physik
63: 477, 1930.Google Scholar
8.
Miller, F. Jr., “A Simplification of Prins’ Formula for Diffraction of X-Rays by a Perfect Crystal,” Phys. Rev.
47: 209, 1935.Google Scholar
9.
Zachariasen, W. H., Theory of X-Ray Diffraction in Crystals,
John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1945.Google Scholar
10.
James, R. W., The Optical Principles of the. Diffraction of X-Rays,
G. Bell and Sons, London, 1950.Google Scholar
11.
Webb, W. W., “X-Ray Diffraction Topography,” Direct Observation of Imperfections in Crystals, Newkirk and Wernick (eds.), Interscience, New York, 1962, p. 29.Google Scholar
12.
Compton, A. H. and Allison, S. K., X-Rays in Theory and Experiment,
D. Van Nostrand Company, Inc., Princeton, New Jersey, 1935.Google Scholar
13.
Batterman, B. W., “X-Ray Integrated Intensity of Germanium Effect of Dislocations and Chemical Impurities,” J. Appl. Phys.
30: 508, 1959.Google Scholar