Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T15:38:02.321Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Correction Method for Elemental Interactions and Physical Effects in the X-Ray Fluorescent Analysis of Silicate Powders

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

A. B. Poole
Affiliation:
Queen Mary College, University of London London, E.I., England
S. M. Holloway
Affiliation:
Queen Mary College, University of London London, E.I., England
Get access

Abstract

Brieketted rock powder discs provide a convenient type of specimen for use in x-ray fluorescent analysis for both major and trace elements. The method is limited because variation of matrix makes calibration difficult over more than a limited range of specimen compositions.

Standard grinding and preparation procedures together with a ratio technique of measurement eliminate variation except that arising from chemical, mineralogical and particle size differences. Several series of standard rock samples have been prepared and the variation of measured intensity per unit concentration have been investigated for the analytical Lines of silicon, aluminium, iron, selenium and cadmium. Computer methods of multivatiate regression analysis have been used to calculate empirical correction factors based on this data and the mineralogical and chemical composition of the specimens. These correction factors have been used to correct the measured intensities of other specimens measured in separate experiments.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Jenkins, R. and De Vries, J. L., “Practical X-Ray Spectrometry”, Philips Technical Library, Netherlands, 1967.Google Scholar
2. Claisse, F. and Samson, C., “Heterogeneity Effects in ll-Ray Analysis”, in W. M. Mueller, Editor, Advances in X-Ray Analysis, Vol. 5, Plenum Press, New York, 1962, pp. 335354.Google Scholar
3. Johnson, W., “Quantitative Analysis of Steelmaking olags”, in Proceedings of the Fourth Conference on X-Ray Analytical Methods, N. V. Philips, Eindhoven, 1964, pp. 73-31.Google Scholar
4. Lucas-Tooth, J., “The Accurate Determination of Major Constituents by X-Ray Fluorescent Analysis in the Presence of large Inter-element Effects” in W. M. Mueller, Editor, Advances in X-Ray Analysis, Vol. 7, Plenum Press, New York, 1963, pp. 523541.Google Scholar
5. Lachance, G. P. and Traill, R. J., “A Practical Solution to the Matrix Problem in X-Ray Analysis”, Can. Spectrosc. 11: 4348, 1966.Google Scholar
6. Welday, E. E., Baird, A. K., Baird, D. B. and Kadlem, K. W., “Silicate Sample Preparation for light Element Analyses by X-Ray Spectrography”, Am. Miner. 49: 889903, 1964.Google Scholar
7. Hooper, P. R., “A Comparison of Sample Preparation Lfethods in use for the XRF Analysis of Rocks”, in J. Buwalda, Editor, Proceedings of the Fifth Conference on X-Ray Analytical Ifethods, N. V. Philips, Eindhoven, 1966, pp. 76-87.Google Scholar
8. Sweatman, T. R., Wong, Y. C. and Toong, K. S., “Application of X-Ray Fluorescence Analysis to the Determination of Tin Ores and Concentrates”, Trans. Inst. Mining and Metallurgy, Sect. B. 76: 149154, 1967.Google Scholar