Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T23:24:33.049Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cognitive behavioural therapy (brief versus standard duration) for schizophrenia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Farooq Naeem ,
Saeed Farooq  and
David Kingdon
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Type
Cochrane Corner
Information
Advances in Psychiatric Treatment , Volume 20 , Issue 4 , July 2014 , pp. 226
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal College of Psychiatrists 2014 

Background

Cognitive–behavioural therapy (CBT) is a psychotherapeutic approach that establishes links between thoughts, emotions and behaviours, and identifies and challenges dysfunctional thoughts. There is some evidence to suggest that CBT for people with psychosis (CBT-P) might also be an effective treatment for people with schizophrenia. There are, however, limitations in its provision owing to available resource and training issues. One way to tackle this problem might be to offer a brief version of CBT-P.

Objectives

To review the effects of brief CBT-P (6 to 10 regular sessions given in less than 4 months and using a manual) compared with standard CBT-P (12 to 20 regular sessions given in 4 to 6 months and using a manual) for people with schizophrenia.

Search methods

We searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group’s Trials Register (August 21, 2013), which is based on regular searches of CINAHL, BIOSIS, AMED, Embase, PubMed, Medline, PsycINFO and registries of clinical trials. There are no language, date, document type, or publication status limitations for inclusion of records in the register. We inspected all references of the selected articles for further relevant trials. We also contacted experts in the field regarding brief CBT-P studies.

Selection criteria

Randomised controlled trials involving adults with schizophrenia or related disorders that compared brief CBT-P with standard CBT-P.

Data collection and analysis

Two review authors independently screened and assessed studies for inclusion using predetermined inclusion criteria.

Main results

We found only seven studies which used a brief version of CBT-P, but no study compared brief CBT-P with CBT-P of standard duration. Therefore, no studies could be included.

Authors’ conclusions

There is currently no literature available that compares brief with standard CBT-P for people with schizophrenia. We cannot, therefore, conclude whether brief CBT-P is as effective, less effective or even more effective than standard courses of the same therapy. This lack of evidence for brief CBT-P has serious implications for research and practice. Well-planned, conducted and reported randomised trials are indicated.

References

Assessed as up to date: 7 December, 2012

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.