Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T01:45:28.670Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Tunnel Vision

Documenting Excavations in Three Dimensions with Lidar Technology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 January 2017

Thomas G. Garrison
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, Kaprielian Hall, 3620 S Vermont Ave., Ste. 352, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 ([email protected])
Dustin Richmond
Affiliation:
Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Dr., La Jolla, CA 92093 ([email protected])
Perry Naughton
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Dr., La Jolla, CA 92093 ([email protected])
Eric Lo
Affiliation:
Qualcomm Institute, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Dr., La Jolla, CA 92093 ([email protected])
Sabrina Trinh
Affiliation:
Qualcomm Institute, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Dr., La Jolla, CA 92093 ([email protected])
Zachary Barnes
Affiliation:
Qualcomm Institute, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Dr., La Jolla, CA 92093 (zach.a.barnes@ gmail.com)
Albert Lin
Affiliation:
Qualcomm Institute, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Dr., La Jolla, CA 92093 ([email protected])
Curt Schurgers
Affiliation:
Qualcomm Institute, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Dr., La Jolla, CA 92093 ([email protected])
Ryan Kastner
Affiliation:
Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Dr., La Jolla, CA 92093 ([email protected])
Sarah E. Newman
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, Wesleyan University, 281 High St., Middletown, CT 06459 ([email protected])
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Archaeological tunneling is a standard excavation strategy in Mesoamerica. The ancient Maya built new structures atop older ones that were no longer deemed usable, whether for logistical or ideological reasons. This means that as archaeologists excavate horizontal tunnels into ancient Maya structures, they are essentially moving back in time. As earlier constructions are encountered, these tunnels may deviate in many directions in order to document architectural remains. The resultant excavations often become intricate labyrinths, extending dozens of meters. Traditional forms of archaeological documentation, such as photographs, plan views, and profile drawings, are limited in their ability to convey the complexity of tunnel excavations. Terrestrial Lidar (light detection and ranging) instruments are able to generate precise 3D models of tunnel excavations. This article presents the results of a model created with a Faro™ Focus 3D 120 Scanner of tunneling excavations at the site of El Zotz, Guatemala. The lidar data document the excavations inside a large mortuary pyramid, including intricately decorated architecture from an Early Classic (A.D. 300–600) platform buried within the present form of the structure. Increased collaboration between archaeologists and scholars with technical expertise maximizes the effectiveness of 3D models, as does presenting digital results in tandem with traditional forms of documentation.

La excavación de túneles es una metodología común en Mesoamérica. Los antiguos mayas construyeron edificios nuevos encima de los que ya no eran usables, quizás por razones logísticas o ideológicas. Este quiere decir que cuando los arqueólogos excavan túneles horizontales en las estructuras mayas, están pasando atrás en tiempo con su profundidad. Cuando se encuentra subestructuras, estos túneles pueden desviar en direcciones varias en el proceso de registrar la arquitectura enterrada, la cual normalmente es mejor conservada que los edificios más tardes de la superficie. Las excavaciones muchas veces se convierten en laberintos, extendiendo para docenas de metros. La documentación arqueológica tradicional, en la forma de fotografías, plantas, y perfiles tienen límites en lo que se pueden mostrar de la complejidad de los túneles. Los instrumentos de Lidar (detección de luz y rango) terrestres se pueden generar modelos 3D precisos de las excavaciones en túneles, documentando los rasgos arqueológicos con detalle increíble. Este articulo presenta los resultados de un modelo creado con un Faro™ Focus 3D 120 Scanner de las excavaciones en túneles en el sitio arqueológico El Zotz, Guatemala. Los datos de Lidar adquirido registran las excavaciones adentro de una gran pirámide mortuoria, incluyendo arquitectura elaborada con estuco modelado del Clásico Temprano (300–600 d.C.) de una plataforma enterrada. Los datos coleccionados se puede usar para crear caminatas virtuales de las excavaciones y conservan toda la información de los túneles aún están rellenados. La colaboración entre arqueólogos y especialistas en tecnologías digitales aumenta la eficaz de los modelos en 3D, y también la presentación de estos modelos juntos con la documentación tradicional.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 2016

References

References Cited

Agurcia Fasquelle, Ricardo, and Fash, Barbara W. 2005. The Evolution of Structure 10L-16, Heart of the Copán Acropolis. In Copán: The History of an Ancient Maya Kingdom, edited by Wyllys Andrews, E. and Fash, William L., pp. 201238. School of American Research Press, Santa Fe, New Mexico.Google Scholar
Blais, François and Angelo Beraldin, J. 2006. Recent Developments in 3D Multi-modal Laser Imaging Applied to Cultural Heritage. Machine Vision and Applications 17:395409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrasco Vargas, Ramón, Vásquez López, Verónica A., and Martin , Simon 2009. Daily Life of the Ancient Maya Recorded on Murals at Calakmul, Mexico. PNAS 106:1924519249.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coe, William R. 1990. Excavations in the Great Plaza, North Terrace, and North Acropolis of Tikal. Tikal Report 14. University Museum, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Coe, William R., and Haviland , William A. 1982. Introduction to the Archaeology of Tikal, Guatemala. Tikal Report 12. University Museum, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fash, Barbara 2012. Beyond the Naked Eye: Multidimensionality of Sculpture in Archaeological Illustration. In Past Presented: Archaeological Illustration and the Ancient Americas, edited by Pillsbury, Joanne, pp. 449470. Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Fash, William L. 1998. Dynastic Architectural Programs: Intention and Design in Classic Maya Buildings at Copan and Other Sites. In Function and Meaning in Classic Maya Architecture, edited by Houston, Stephen D., pp. 223270. Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Fash, William L., and Fasquelle, Ricardo Agurcia 2005. Contributions and Controversies in the Archaeology and History of Copán. In Copán: The History of an Ancient Maya Kingdom, edited by Wyllys Andrews, E. and Fash, William L., pp. 332. School of American Research Press, Santa Fe, New Mexico.Google Scholar
Fash, William L., and Sharer , Robert J. 1991. Sociopolitical Developments and Methodological Issues at Copan, Honduras: A Conjunctive Perspective. Latin American Antiquity 2:166187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, Kevin, Simon, Katie, Lippiello, Lauren, and Cothren, Jackson 2012. Approaches to 3D Digital Recording of an Early Classic Temple Façade at El Zotz, Guatemala. Paper presented at the 77th Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, Memphis, Tennessee.Google Scholar
Galeazzi, Fabrizio 2016. Towards the Definition of Best 3D Practices in Archaeology: Assessing 3D Documentation Techniques for Intra-site Data Recording. Journal of Cultural Heritage 17:159169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gonzales-Aguilera, Diego, Muñoz-Nieto, Angel, Gómez-Lahoz, Javier, Herrero-Pascual, Jesus, and Gutierrez-Alonso, Gabriel 2009. 3D Digital Surveying and Modelling of Cave Geometry: Application to Paleolithic Rock Art. Sensors 9:11081127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grussenmeyer, Pierre, Burens-Carroza, Albane, Moisen, Emmanuel, Guillemin, Samuel, Carozza, Laurent, Bourrillon, Raphaelle, and Petrognani, Stephane 2012. 3D Multi-Scale Scanning of the Archaeological Cave “Les Fraux” in Dordogne (France). Lectures Notes in Computer Science 7616:388395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamann, Byron E. 2012. Drawing Glyphs Together. In Past Presented: Archaeological Illustration and the Ancient Americas, edited by Pillsbury, Joanne, pp. 231282. Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Houston, Stephen D., Nelson, Zachary, Chiriboga, Carlos, and Spensley, Ellen 2003. The Acropolis of Kaminaljuyú, Guatemala: Recovering a “Lost Excavation.” Mayab 16:4964.Google Scholar
Houston, Stephen, Newman, Sarah, Román, Edwin, and Garrison , Thomas 2015. Temple of the Night Sun: A Royal Tomb at El Diablo, Guatemala. Precolumbia Mesoweb Press, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Laporte, Juan Pedro, and Fialko, Vilma 1985. Reporte Arqueológico (1979–1984): Mundo Perdido y Zonas de Habitación, Tikal, Petén. Instituto de Antropología e Historia y Ministerios de Educación y Comunicaciones, Transporte y Obras Públicas, Guatemala.Google Scholar
Laporte, Juan Pedro, and Valdés , Juan Antonio 1993. Tikal y Uaxactún en el Preclásico. UNAM, Mexico.Google Scholar
Lindgren, Stefan, and Galeazzi, François 2013. 3D Laser Scanning in Cave Environment: The Case of Las Cuevas, Belize. Acquisition of the Cave System and Excavation Area. In 2013 Digital Heritage International Conference, 28 October – 1 November 2013, Marseille, France, Volume 1, edited by Addison, A.C., Guidi, G., De Luca, L., and Pescarin, S., pp. 219222. Proceedings of the Institute of Electronical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE).Google Scholar
Petrovic, Vid, Gidding, Aaron, Wypych, Tom, Kuester, Falko, DeFanti, Thomas, and Levy, Thomas 2011. Dealing with Archaeology’s Data Avalanche. Computer (7):5660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petrovic, Vid, Vanoni, David, Richter, Ashley, Levy, Thomas, and Kuester, Falko 2014. Visualizing High Resolution Three-Dimensional and Two-Dimensional Data of Cultural Heritage Sites. Mediterranean Archaeology and Archaeometry 14(4):93100.Google Scholar
Rick, John W. 2012. Realizing the Illustration Potential of Digital Models and Images: Beyond Visualization. In Past Presented: Archaeological Illustration and the Ancient Americas, edited by Pillsbury, J., pp. 413446. Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Ruppert, Karl 1952. Chichen Itza: Architectural Notes and Plans. Publication 595. Carnegie Institution of Washington, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Saturno, William 2009. High Resolution Documentation of the Murals of San Bartolo, Guatemala. In Maya Archaeology 1, edited by Charles Golden, Stephen Houston, and Skidmore, Joel, pp. 827. Precolumbia Mesoweb Press, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Saturno, William A., Taube, Karl, and Stuart , David 2005. The Murals of San Bartolo, El Petén, Guatemala, Part I: The North Wall. Ancient America 7. Center for Ancient American Studies, Barnardsville, North Carolina.Google Scholar
Schmalstieg, Dieter, and Wagner, Daniel 2007. Experiences with Handheld Augmented Reality. 6th IEEE and ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, 2007, pp. 318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharer, Robert J., Sedat, David W., Traxler, Loa P., Miller, Julia C., and Bell, Ellen E. 2005. Early Classic Royal Power in Copán: The Origins and Development of the Acropolis (ca. A.D. 250–600). In Copán: The History of an Ancient Maya Kingdom, edited by Andrews, E. W. and Fash, W. L., pp. 139200. School of American Research Press, Santa Fe, New Mexico, and Oxford Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Smith, A. Ledyard 1950. Uaxactun, Guatemala: Excavations of 1931–1937. Publication 588. Carnegie Institution of Washington, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Stromsvik, Gustav 1952. The Ball Courts at Copan: With Notes on Courts at La Union, Quirigua, San Pedro Pinula and Asuncion Mita. Publication 596. Carnegie Institution of Washington, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Stuart, David 2012. The Name of Paper: The Mythology of Crowning and Royal Nomenclature on Palenque’s Palace Tablet. In Maya Archaeology 2, edited by Golden, Charles, Houston, Stephen, and Skidmore, Joel, pp. 116142. Precolumbia Mesoweb Press, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Warren, Charles 1876. Underground Jerusalem: An Account of Some of the Principal Difficulties Encountered in Its Exploration and the Results Obtained. Richard Bentley and Son, London.Google Scholar
Wittich, Christine E., Hutchinson, Tara C., Wood, Richard L., and Kuester, Falko 2012. A Methodology for Integrative Documentation and Characterization of Culturally Important Statues to Support Seismic Analysis. In Progress in Cultural Heritage Preservation, edited by Ioannides, M., Fritsch, D., Leissner, J., Davies, R., Remondino, F., and Caffo, R., pp. 825832. Springer, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, Richard L., Hutchinson, Tara C., Wittich, Christine E., and Kuester, Falko 2012. Characterizing Cracks in the Frescoes of Sala degli Elementi within Florence’s Palazzo Vecchio. In Progress in Cultural Heritage Preservation, edited by Ioannides, M., Fritsch, D., Leissner, J., Davies, R., Remondino, F., Caffo, R., pp. 776783. Springer, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar