Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T09:21:33.721Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Proposal for the Standardized Reporting of Error and Paradata Regarding Structure from Motion (SfM) 3D Models Used in Recording and Consolidating Archaeological Architecture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2020

Mario Borrero*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, #0532, La Jolla, CA92093-0532, USA
Luke R. Stroth
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, #0532, La Jolla, CA92093-0532, USA
*
([email protected], corresponding author)

Abstract

In the past decade, archaeologists have increasingly made use of photogrammetry, the process of creating 3D models from photographs, in a variety of field and lab settings. We argue that we must, as a discipline, develop a consistent methodology to ensure that 3D models are held to a consistent standard, including not only photographic protocol but also the documentation of model accuracy using an agreed-upon measure. To help develop this discussion, we present our system for incorporating photogrammetry into the documentation of architecture. This technique was developed at the site of Nim Li Punit, Belize, in 2018. Excavating architecture involves documenting the pre-excavated building, liberating overburden, documenting all in situ construction (including wall fall, fill stones, and standing architecture), drawing consolidated architecture, and documenting the final state of the post-excavated buildings. The generation of 3D models greatly assisted in all facets of the excavation, documentation, analysis, and consolidation processes. To ensure that our models were accurate, we documented the reprojection error and final model horizontal distortion to assess the quality of the model. We suggest that documenting both forms of error should become standard practice in any discussion of archaeological applications of photogrammetry.

En la última década, los arqueólogos han recurrido cada vez más al uso de la fotogrametría, el proceso en el cual crean modelos tridimensionales (3D) con fotografías. Este proceso se da una variedad de lugares como en el campo y/o laboratorio. Discutimos que, como disciplina, debemos desarrollar una metodología consistente para garantizar que los modelos 3D se mantengan en un estándar consistente, que incluya no solo el protocolo fotográfico y que la documentación sea precisa y utilice las medidas acrodadas en la metodología aprobada. Para ayudar a desarrollar esta discusión, presentamos nuestro sistema para incorporar fotogrametría en la documentación de la arquitectura. Esta técnica se desarrolló en el sitio arqueológico de Nim Li Punit, Belice, en 2018. La excavación de arquitectura consiste en documentar el edificio preexcavado, liberar la sobrecarga, documentar toda la construcción in situ (incluida la caída de muros, piedras de relleno y arquitectura en pie), dibujos de la arquitectura consolidada, y documentación del estado final de los edificios post-excavación. La generación de modelos 3D ha ayudado mucho en todas las facetas de los procesos de excavación, documentación, análisis y consolidación. Para garantizar que nuestros modelos fueran precisos, documentamos el error de reproyección para evaluar la calidad de la alineación y los cambios en las distancias entre los puntos de control ya conocidos medidos en el mundo real, y las medidas realizadas en el mismo punto en el espacio digital. Nuestra meta será la de evaluar el grado de distorsión en el proyecto final. Sugerimos que documentar ambas formas de error se convierta en una práctica estándar en futuras discusiones sobre aplicaciones arqueológicas utilizando la fotogrametría.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright 2020 © Society for American Archaeology

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES CITED

Agisoft 2019 User Manual. Agisoft, LLC, St. Petersburg, Russia. https://www.agisoft.com/downloads/user-manuals, accessed March 19, 2020.Google Scholar
Antón, Daniel, Medjdoub, Benachir, Shrahily, Raid, and Moyano, Juan 2018 Accuracy Evaluation of the Semi-Automatic 3D Modeling for Historical Building Information Models. International Journal of Architectural Heritage 12:790805. DOI:10.1080/15583058.2017.1415391.Google Scholar
Ashmore, Wendy, and Sabloff, Jeremy A. 2002 Spatial Orders in Maya Civic Plans. Latin American Antiquity 13:201215.Google Scholar
Barbasiewicz, Adrianna, Widerski, Tadeusz, and Daliga, Karol 2018 The Analysis of the Accuracy of Spatial Models Using Photogrammetric Software: Agisoft Photoscan and Pix4D. E3S Web of Conferences 26:000012. DOI:10.1051/e3sconf/20182600012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentkowska-Kafel, Anna, Denard, Hugh, and Baker, Drew (editors) 2012 Paradata and Transparency in Virtual Heritage. Ashgate, Farnham, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
Borrero, Mario, Azarova, Maya, and Braswell, Geoffrey E. 2016 In the Palace of the Wind God: The Discovery of the Nim Li Punit Wind Jewel. Research Reports in Belizean Archaeology 13:193206.Google Scholar
Borrero, Mario, Stroth, Luke, and Braswell, Geoffrey 2019 Discoveries and Advances in the Archaeology of Nim Li Punit: Results and Methods of the 2019 Field Season. Research Reports in Belizean Archaeology 16:303310.Google Scholar
Braswell, Geoffrey E. 2017 Recent Discoveries in the Classic Maya Palace Complex of Nim li Punit, Belize. Journal of Field Archaeology 42:6981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braswell, Geoffrey E., Borrero, Mario, and Stroth, Luke 2019 Toledo Regional Interaction Project 2018 Annual Report. UCSD Mesoamerican Archaeology Laboratory, Occasional Paper No. 10. UC Regents, Sacramento, California.Google Scholar
Braswell, Geoffrey E., and Daniels, James T. Jr. 2013 Toledo Regional Interaction Project 2013 Annual Report. UCSD Mesoamerican Archaeology Laboratory, Occasional Paper No. 7. UC Regents, Sacramento, California.Google Scholar
Braswell, Geoffrey E., and Prufer, Keith M. 2009 Political Organization and Interaction in Southern Belize. Research Reports in Belizean Archaeology 9:4354.Google Scholar
Brown, David O., Willis, Mark D., and Walker, Chester P. 2019 More Than Pretty Pictures: A Decade of Aerial Imagery and Photogrammetry in Northern Ecuador. Paper presented at the 84th Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, Albuquerque, New Mexico.Google Scholar
Burns, J. H. R., and Delparte, D. 2017 Comparison of Commercial Structure-from-Motion Photogrammetry Software Used for Underwater Three-Dimensional Modeling of Coral Reef Environments. International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences 42:127131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chrisman, Nicholas R. 1983 The Role of Quality Information in the Long-Term Functioning of a Geographic Information System.” In Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Automated Cartography (Auto-Carto VI), pp. 303–321. Ottawa-Hull, Canada.Google Scholar
Douglass, Matthew, Lin, Sam, and Chodoronek, Michael 2015 Photogrammetry for In-Field Documentation of Archaeological Features. Advances in Archaeological Practice 3:136152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fauvelle, Mikael, Fisher, Chelsea R., and Braswell, Geoffrey E. 2013 Return to the Kingdom of the Eagle: Archaeological Investigations at Nim Li Punit, Belize. Research Reports in Belizean Archaeology 10:241251.Google Scholar
Fei Peng, Sam C. Lin, Guo, Jialonog, Wang, Huimin, and Gao, Xing 2017 The Application of SfM Photogrammetry Software for Extracting Artifact Provenience from Palaeolithic Excavation Surfaces. Journal of Field Archaeology 42:326336.Google Scholar
Fernandez, Rachel 2019 Digital Curation of Photogrammetric Data. Paper presented at the 84th Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, Albuquerque, New Mexico.Google Scholar
Forte, Maurizio, Dell'Unto, Nicolo, Issavi, Justine, Onsurez, Lionel, and Lercari, Nicola 2012 3D Archaeology at Çatalhöyük. International Journal of Heritage in the Digital Era 1:351378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fritz, Carole, Willis, Mark D., and Tosello, Gilles 2016 Reconstructing Paleolithic Cave Art: The Example of Marsoulas Cave (France). Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 10:910916.Google Scholar
Garagnani, Simone 2017 Archaeological Building Information Modeling: Beyond Scalable Representation of Architecture and Archaeology. Archeologia e Calcolatori 28:141149.Google Scholar
Grauer, Kacey C., Nissen, Zachary A., Dziki, Gabreila, Menz, Martin, Kosakowsky, Laura J., and Robin, Cynthia 2019 Household Excavations at Aventura, a Northern Belize Civic Center. Paper presented at the 16th Annual Meeting of the Belize Archaeology Symposium, San Ignacio, Belize.Google Scholar
Halperin, Christina T., and Garrido, Jose Luis 2020 Architectural Aesthetic, Orientations, and Reuse at the Terminal Classic Maya Site of Ucanal, Petén, Guatemala. Journal of Field Archaeology 45:4666. DOI:10.1080/00934690.2019.1676033.Google Scholar
Halperin, Christina T., Le Moine, Jean-Baptiste, and Zambrano, Enrique Pérez 2019 Infrastructures of Moving Water at the Maya Site of Ucanal, Petén, Guatemala. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 56. DOI:10.1016/j.jaa.2019.101102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammond, Norman, Howarth, Sheena, and Wilk, Richard R. 1999 The Discovery, Exploration, and Monuments of Nim Li Punit, Belize. Research Reports on Ancient Maya Writing 40:116.Google Scholar
Harrison-Buck, Eleanor 2012 Architecture as Animate Landscape: Circular Shrines in the Ancient Maya Lowlands. American Anthropologist 114:6480.Google ScholarPubMed
Havemann, Sven 2016 Intricacies and Potentials of Gathering Paradata in the 3D Modelling Workflow. In Paradata and Transparency in Virtual Heritage, edited by Bentkowska-Kafel, Anna and Denard, Hugh, pp. 220235. Routledge, New York.Google Scholar
Helmke, Christophe, Guenter, Stanley P, and Wanyerka, Phillip J. 2018 Kings of the East: Altun Ha and the Water Scroll Emblem Glyph. Ancient Mesoamerica 29:113135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hohmann-Vogrin, Annegrete 2006 Spatial Alignments in Maya Architecture. In Space and Spatial Analysis in Archaeology, edited by Robertson, Elizabeth C., Seibert, Jeffrey D., Fernandez, Deepika C., and Zender, Marc U., pp. 199204. University of Calgary Press, Alberta, Canada.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houston, Stephen D. (editor) 1998 Function and Meaning in Classic Maya Architecture: A Symposium at Dumbarton Oaks, 7th and 8th October 1994. Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Howland, Matthew D., Kuester, Falko, and Levy, Thomas E. 2014 Structure from Motion: Twenty-First Century Field Recording with 3D Technology. Near Eastern Archaeology 77:187191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irish, Mark David, 2015 The Ceramics of Lubaantun: Stasis and Change in the Southern Belize Region during the Late and Terminal Classic. Master's thesis, Department of Anthropology, University of California, San Diego.Google Scholar
Ishida, Kosei 2017 Investigating the Accuracy of 3D Models Created Using SfM. Paper presented at the 34th International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction. Taipei, Taiwan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khalaf, Abbas, Ataiwe, Tariq, Mohammed, Israa, and Kareem, Ali 2018 3D Digital Modeling for Archeology Using Close Range Photogrammetry. In MATEC Web of Conferences 162:03027. DOI:10.1051/matecconf/201816203027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koeva, Mila N. 2004 3D Realistic Modelling and Visualization of Buildings in Urban Areas. Paper presented at the International Symposium on Modern Technologies, Education, and Professional Practice in Geodesy and Related Fields, Sofia, Bulgaria.Google Scholar
Koutsoudis, Anestis, Vidmar, Blaž, Ioannakis, George, Arnaoutoglou, Fotis, Pavlidis, George, and Chamzas, Christodoulos 2014 Multi-Image 3D Reconstruction Data Evaluation. Journal of Cultural Heritage 15:7379.Google Scholar
Lerma, José Luis, and Muir, Colin 2014 Evaluating the 3D Documentation of an Early Christian Upright Stone with Carvings from Scotland with Multiples Images. Journal of Archaeological Science 46:311318.Google Scholar
Lerma, José Luis, Navarro, Santiago, Cabrelles, Miriam, and Villaverde, Valentín 2010 Terrestrial Laser Scanning and Close Range Photogrammetry for 3D Archaeological Documentation: The Upper Paleolithic Cave of Parpalló as a Case Study. Journal of Archaeological Science 37:499507.Google Scholar
Leventhal, Richard M. 1990 Southern Belize: An Ancient Maya Region. In Vision and Revision in Maya Studies, edited by Clancy, Flora S. and Harrison, Peter D., pp. 125141. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Leventhal, Richard M. 1992 The Development of a Regional Tradition in Southern Belize. In New Theories on the Ancient Maya, edited by Danien, Elin C. and Sharer, Robert J., pp. 145153. University Museum Monograph 77, University Museum Symposium Series Vol. 3. University Museum, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Lominy, Martin 2006 Architectural Variability in the Maya Lowlands of the Late Classic Period: A Recent Perspective on Ancient Maya Cultural Diversity. In Space and Spatial Analysis in Archaeology, edited by Robertson, Elizabeth C., Seibert, Jeffrey D., Fernandez, Deepika C., and Zender, Marc U., pp. 177188. University of Calgary Press, Alberta, Canada.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McWilliams, N., Teeuw, R., Whiteside, M., and Zukowskyj, P. 2005 Field Techniques: GIS, GPS and Remote Sensing. Royal Geographic Society, London.Google Scholar
Myers, Joshua A., and Badillo, Alex E. 2019 Bethel Cemetery: Photogrammetric Field Methods in Burial Excavation. Paper presented at the 84th Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, Albuquerque, New Mexico.Google Scholar
Niederheiser, Robert, Mokros, Martin, Lange, Julia, Petschko, Helene, Prasicek, Günther, and Elberink, Sander Oude 2016 Deriving 3D Point Clouds from Terrestrial Photographs: Comparison of Different Sensors and Software. In XXIII ISPRS Congress, pp. 685692. Prague, Czech Republic.Google Scholar
Olson, Brandon R., Placchetti, Ryan A., Quartermaine, Jamie, and Killebrew, Ann E. 2013 The Tel Akko Total Archaeology Project (Akko, Israel): Assessing the Suitability of Multi-Scale 3D Field Recording in Archaeology. Journal of Field Archaeology 38:244262.Google Scholar
Pavlidis, George, Koutsoudis, Anestis, Arnaoutoglou, Fotis, Tsioukas, Vassilos, and Chamzas, Christodoulos 2006 Methods for 3D Digitization of Cultural Heritage. Journal of Cultural Heritage 8:9398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plets, Gertjan, Verhoeven, Geert, Cheremisin, Dimitry, Plets, Ruth, Bourgeois, Jean, Stichelbaut, Birger, Gheyle, Wouter, and de Reu, Jeroen 2012 The Deteriorating Preservation of the Altai Rock Art: Assessing Three-Dimensional Image-Based Modelling in Rock Art Research and Management. Rock Art Research 29:139156.Google Scholar
Porter, Samantha Thi, Roussel, Megan, and Soressi, Marie 2016 A Simple Photogrammetry Rig for the Reliable Creation of 3D Artifact Models in the Field: Lithic Examples from the Early Upper Paleolithic Sequence of Les Cottés (France). Advances in Archaeological Practice 4:7186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powis, Terry G., Micheletti, George J., Crow, Kaitlin, Skaggs, Sheldon, Stanchly, Norbert, Cartagenan, Nicaela, and Powis, Jeffrey A. 2019 Early Maya Ceremonial Architecture at Pacbitun, Belize. Latin American Antiquity 30:17. DOI:10.1017/laq.2019.63.Google Scholar
Prager, Christian M., and Braswell, Geoffrey E. 2016 Maya Politics and Ritual: An Important New Hieroglyphic Text on a Carved Jade Artifact from Belize. Ancient Mesoamerica 27:267278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Randles, Bryan, Jones, Brian, Welcher, Judson, Szabo, Thomas, Elliott, David, and MacAdams, Cameron 2010 The Accuracy of Photogrammetry vs. Hands-On Measurement Techniques Used in Accident Reconstruction. No. 2010-01-0065. SAE Technical Paper. SAE 2010 World Congress & Exhibition. DOI:10.4271/2010-01-0065.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reilly, Paul 1991 Towards a Virtual Archaeology. In Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology 1990, edited by S. Rahtz and K. Lockyear, CAA90, pp. 132139 (BAR International Series 565). Tempus Reparatum, Oxford.Google Scholar
Richards-Rissetto, Heather, and von Schwerin, Jennifer 2017 A Catch 22 of 3D Data Sustainability: Lessons in 3D Archaeological Data Management & Accessibility. Digital Applications in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage 6:3848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sapirstein, Philip 2016 Accurate Measurement with Photogrammetry at Large Sites. Journal of Archaeological Science 66:137145. DOI:10.1016/j.jas.2016.01.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sapirstein, Philip, and Murray, Sarah 2017 Establishing Best Practices for Photogrammetric Recording during Archaeological Fieldwork. Journal of Field Archaeology 42:337350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shurik, Katherine 2019 Digitization of Small Artifacts. Paper presented at the 84th Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, Albuquerque, New Mexico.Google Scholar
Skaggs, Sheldon, Pierce, Karen, Lawrence, Mike, and Powis, Terry 2018 Full Court Press: Ongoing Investigations in Courtyards at Pacbitun, Belize. Paper presented at the 16th Annual Meeting of the Belize Archaeology Symposium, San Ignacio, Belize.Google Scholar
Stuart, Jeffrey 2015 Challenging Heritage Visualisation: Beauty, Aura and Democratisation. Open Archaeology 1. DOI:10.1515/opar-2015-0008.Google Scholar
Turco, M. Lo, Calvano, M., and Giovannini, E. C. 2019 Data Modeling for Museum Collections. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences 42(2). DOI:10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W9-433-2019.Google Scholar
von Schwerin, Jennifer 2011 The Sacred Mountain in Social Context: Symbolism and History in Maya Architecture: Temple 22 at Copan, Honduras. Ancient Mesoamerica 22:271300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, David 1998 Classic Maya Architecture: Implications and Comparisons. In Function and Meaning in Classic Maya Architecture: A Symposium at Dumbarton Oaks, 7th and 8th October 1994, edited by Houston, Stephen D., pp. 548. Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Yilmaz, H. M., Yakar, M., Gulec, S. A., and Dulgerler, O. N. 2007 Importance of Digital Close-Range Photogrammetry in Documentation of Cultural Heritage. Journal of Cultural Heritage 8:428433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Borrero and Stroth supplementary material

Borrero and Stroth supplementary material 1

Download Borrero and Stroth supplementary material(File)
File 14.4 KB
Supplementary material: Image

Borrero and Stroth supplementary material

Borrero and Stroth supplementary material 2

Download Borrero and Stroth supplementary material(Image)
Image 44.8 KB